Tests – · none yet Owners 54 · 17 reviews
Yokohama S306 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Yokohama S306 vs Yokohama BluEarth RV02 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 17 + 8 owner reviews. How we score
BluEarth RV02 is ahead, 65–58
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 64 · 2 tests Owners 65 · 8 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
61
Dry
BluEarth RV02 +162Why this score
Source S306 BluEarth RV02 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 58 Reviews found online 57 68 S306: 60% × 63.3 (est.) + 40% × 56.6 = 61
BluEarth RV02: 60% × 58.5 + 40% × 67.7 = 62
No road tests of dry for S306. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
56
Wet
BluEarth RV02 +1369Why this score
Source S306 BluEarth RV02 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 60 (est.) 67 Reviews found online 51 72 S306: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 50.9 = 56
BluEarth RV02: 60% × 67 + 40% × 72.2 = 69
No road tests of wet for S306. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).
-
55
Comfort
BluEarth RV02 +1166Why this score
Source S306 BluEarth RV02 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 61 Reviews found online 48 69 S306: 40% × 65.3 (est.) + 60% × 47.6 = 55
BluEarth RV02: 40% × 61.3 + 60% × 69.4 = 66
No road tests of comfort for S306. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison65Why this score
Source S306 BluEarth RV02 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 64 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) BluEarth RV02: 60% × 64.2 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 65
No owner ratings of noise for BluEarth RV02. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
61
Treadwear
Level61Why this score
Source S306 BluEarth RV02 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 67 Reviews found online 57 52 S306: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 57 = 61
BluEarth RV02: 60% × 66.8 + 40% × 52 = 61
No road tests of treadwear for S306. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
49
Handling (owners)
BluEarth RV02 +2069Why this score
Source S306 BluEarth RV02 Reviews found online 49 69 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison71Why this score
Source S306 BluEarth RV02 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama S306 | Yokohama BluEarth RV02 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 58 | 65 |
| Dry | 61 | 62 |
| Wet | 56 | 69 |
| Comfort | 55 | 66 |
| Noise | – | 65 |
| Treadwear | 61 | 61 |
| Handling (owners) | 49 | 69 |
| Efficiency | – | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
S306
BluEarth RV02
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A S306
Pros
- Excellent dry weather grip and handling
- High tread longevity and durability
- Stiff sidewall provides good steering feedback
Cons
- Consistently poor wet weather traction
- Harsh ride quality and high road noise
- Tendency to tramline on uneven surfaces
Tire B BluEarth RV02
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry surface grip
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Improved vehicle stability for tall-profile vehicles like MPVs and SUVs
Cons
- Noticeable increase in noise and decrease in comfort as tread wears down
- Reports of premature sidewall or tread cracking
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users noting rapid wear due to softer compounds
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama S306 | B · Yokohama BluEarth RV02 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 4 |
| Rim diameters | — | 17″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama S306
Yokohama BluEarth RV02
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth RV02 — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama S306 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 17 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama BluEarth RV02 scores 69 vs 49 on handling.
Yokohama BluEarth RV02 scores 69 vs 56 on wet.
Yokohama BluEarth RV02 scores 66 vs 55 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
S306 or BluEarth RV02?
Which is better in the wet, S306 or BluEarth RV02?
Yokohama BluEarth RV02, 69 vs 56 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, S306 or BluEarth RV02?
Neither, by our numbers: 61 vs 62 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, S306 or BluEarth RV02?
Yokohama BluEarth RV02, 66 vs 55 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, S306 or BluEarth RV02?
Neither, by our numbers: 61 vs 61 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology