Tests – · none yet Owners 54 · 35 reviews
General AltiMAX RT looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental ContiCrossContact LX vs General AltiMAX RT — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 35 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
AltiMAX RT is ahead, 65–59
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 11 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
59
Dry
AltiMAX RT +665Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX AltiMAX RT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 55 64 ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 54.6 = 59
AltiMAX RT: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.7 = 65
No road tests of dry for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
61
Wet
AltiMAX RT +667Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX AltiMAX RT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 59 66 ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.5 = 61
AltiMAX RT: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 66 = 67
No road tests of wet for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
60
Snow
AltiMAX RT +161Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX AltiMAX RT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 54 55 ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 53.9 = 60
AltiMAX RT: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 55 = 61
No road tests of snow for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
62
Comfort
AltiMAX RT +365Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX AltiMAX RT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 54 62 ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.3 = 62
AltiMAX RT: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.5 = 65
No road tests of comfort for ContiCrossContact LX or AltiMAX RT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Noise
Level66Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX AltiMAX RT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 63 65 ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.3 = 66
AltiMAX RT: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 66
No road tests of noise for ContiCrossContact LX or AltiMAX RT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
54
Treadwear
AltiMAX RT +1165Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX AltiMAX RT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 46 64 ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 46.2 = 54
AltiMAX RT: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
51
Handling (owners)
AltiMAX RT +1364Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX AltiMAX RT Reviews found online 51 64
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiCrossContact LX | General AltiMAX RT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 59 | 65 |
| Dry | 59 | 65 |
| Wet | 61 | 67 |
| Snow | 60 | 61 |
| Comfort | 62 | 65 |
| Noise | 66 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 54 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 51 | 64 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiCrossContact LX
AltiMAX RT
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiCrossContact LX
Pros
- Strong dry-road grip and handling performance
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality on pavement
- Competitive price point compared to premium alternatives
Cons
- Poor wet-weather performance, including hydroplaning and sliding
- Inconsistent and often premature tread wear
- Susceptibility to uneven wear patterns
Tire B AltiMAX RT
Pros
- Affordable price point offering high value
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality suitable for large sedans
- Reliable all-around traction in both wet and dry conditions
Cons
- Subpar wet-weather performance reported by some users
- Premature tread wear down to 30,000 miles in isolated experiences
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX | B · General AltiMAX RT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All-Season Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 4 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 18″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 680 A B | 440 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | 70,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiCrossContact LX
General AltiMAX RT
Winner: General AltiMAX RT — better handling, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. General AltiMAX RT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
General AltiMAX RT scores 64 vs 51 on handling.
General AltiMAX RT scores 65 vs 54 on treadwear.
General AltiMAX RT scores 65 vs 59 on dry.
General AltiMAX RT scores 67 vs 61 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiCrossContact LX or AltiMAX RT?
Which is better in the wet, ContiCrossContact LX or AltiMAX RT?
General AltiMAX RT, 67 vs 61 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiCrossContact LX or AltiMAX RT?
General AltiMAX RT, 65 vs 59 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ContiCrossContact LX or AltiMAX RT?
Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 61 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, ContiCrossContact LX or AltiMAX RT?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 66 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, ContiCrossContact LX or AltiMAX RT?
General AltiMAX RT, 65 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiCrossContact LX or AltiMAX RT?
General AltiMAX RT, 65 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology