Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 35 reviews
Continental ContiCrossContact LX vs Continental CrossContact LX Sport — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 35 + 562 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: ContiCrossContact LX and CrossContact LX Sport are level at 57.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 562 reviews
“CRV-Hybrid Touring owners, how do you like your OEM tires? I'm a proud new owner of a '26 ST and I have the Continental Cross Contact LX Sport tires on my car. I'm not crazy about them. I'm wondering if I should upgrade to Michelin Defenders or something. Thoughts? The Touring comes with the Continental Cross Contact LX Sport (not to be confused with LX25) or the Michelin Primacy A/S. I sorta wish I would have pushed them to switch me to the Primacy A/S. Read more”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
57
Dry
CrossContact LX Sport +259Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 51 54 ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 57
CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 62.2 (est.) + 40% × 54 = 59
No road tests of dry for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
59
Wet
CrossContact LX Sport +261Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 55 57 ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 62.1 (est.) + 40% × 54.9 = 59
CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 63.1 (est.) + 40% × 56.7 = 61
No road tests of wet for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
60
Snow
CrossContact LX Sport +363Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 53 57 ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 60
CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 57 = 63
No road tests of snow for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
56
Comfort
CrossContact LX Sport +561Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 51 57 ContiCrossContact LX: 40% × 65 (est.) + 60% × 50.5 = 56
CrossContact LX Sport: 40% × 66.4 (est.) + 60% × 57.3 = 61
No road tests of comfort for ContiCrossContact LX or CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Noise
Level64Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 60 61 ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.8 = 64
CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 64
No road tests of noise for ContiCrossContact LX or CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
52
Treadwear
ContiCrossContact LX +1240Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 51 (est.) Reviews found online 43 23 ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 58 (est.) + 40% × 43.1 = 52
CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 50.7 (est.) + 40% × 22.9 = 40
No road tests of treadwear for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
47
Handling (owners)
ContiCrossContact LX +146Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX CrossContact LX Sport Reviews found online 47 46
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiCrossContact LX | Continental CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 57 | 57 |
| Dry | 57 | 59 |
| Wet | 59 | 61 |
| Snow | 60 | 63 |
| Comfort | 56 | 61 |
| Noise | 64 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 52 | 40 |
| Handling (owners) | 47 | 46 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiCrossContact LX
CrossContact LX Sport
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiCrossContact LX
Pros
- Strong dry-road grip and handling performance
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality on pavement
- Competitive price point compared to premium alternatives
Cons
- Poor wet-weather performance, including hydroplaning and sliding
- Inconsistent and often premature tread wear
- Susceptibility to uneven wear patterns
Tire B CrossContact LX Sport
Pros
- Low road noise and exceptional cabin comfort
- Strong handling and reliable grip in wet and dry conditions
- Confident performance in light snow and winter weather
Cons
- Disappointing tread life and faster-than-expected wear
- Occasional reports of reduced traction in heavy mud or specific slick conditions
- Higher price point relative to the longevity experienced by some drivers
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental ContiCrossContact LX
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Continental CrossContact LX Sport
Community sentiment regarding the Continental Cross Contact LX Sport is mixed, with drivers frequently noting it as a standard factory OEM equipment on various SUVs and EVs. While some owners praise its low road noise, comfort, and solid dry handling, others criticize it for poor wet traction, quick tread wear, and issues like flaking or chunking. Many drivers consider replacing them with alternatives from Michelin, Pirelli, or EV-specific options once worn.
“I'm a fan of the Pirelli Scorpion WeatherActives, picked those over the Cross Climate 2s for my XC90 . Not a fan of the Continental CrossContact LX Sports on the wife's 2025 XC60 . Handling in wet feels like absolute garbage, but can't justify swapping them out just yet, but plan to put the WeatherActives or Cross Climate 3s, that's if they come to the States, on her ride when tread is down. Both vehicles ride on 20" rims. I'm also a fan of Vredsteins Quartrac Pro+ and the Nokian Remedy WRG5. Looks like Nokian's Encompass AW02 are in the same vein as the Cross Climate 2 design.”
“My tires were over inflated at purchase - with rears on my 2020 GLC 300 SUV showing 41.5 PSi, and the fronts were ~ 38.5 PSI. Checked cold tire pressure around sunrise this morning with temperature around 50 degrees. Using a high quality tire pressure gauge checked all tires this morning - and reduced pressure in all four tires to 35 PSI. Before the ride was ok but a bit stiff. Just curious if anyone is running these 18" tires and what you feel works best for your GLC 300's. I'd like to hear your thoughts & comments re: inflation pressure. 235/60 R 18 Continental Cross Contact LX Sport Tire size Inner fuel door pressurre table”
“A broken screw went partially into the tire tread, cutting one of the metal wires / belts in the casing. The tire is not losing air. I am concerned the damaged wire belt could lead to a tire failure. The open divot, deeper than the tire tread, also concerns me since it can get packed with debris, damage the other intact wire, or open the hole even more or further puncturing it. Tire is 2 years old with 17k miles so it's in great shape. Continental Cross Contact LX Sport 245/50 R20. This is on my wife's Pilot so I want her to have a reliable tire with no possibility of having a failure due to this damage, if that is likely here. What do you guys think?”
Based on 27 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX | B · Continental CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 4 | 39 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 18″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 680 A B | 480 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 4 | 4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiCrossContact LX
Continental CrossContact LX Sport
Too close to call: Continental ContiCrossContact LX and Continental CrossContact LX Sport are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiCrossContact LX is stronger on treadwear. Continental CrossContact LX Sport is stronger on comfort and snow.
Continental ContiCrossContact LX scores 52 vs 40 on treadwear.
Continental CrossContact LX Sport scores 61 vs 56 on comfort.
Continental CrossContact LX Sport scores 63 vs 60 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiCrossContact LX or CrossContact LX Sport?
Which is better in the wet, ContiCrossContact LX or CrossContact LX Sport?
Neither, by our numbers: 59 vs 61 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiCrossContact LX or CrossContact LX Sport?
Neither, by our numbers: 57 vs 59 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, ContiCrossContact LX or CrossContact LX Sport?
Continental CrossContact LX Sport, 63 vs 60 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, ContiCrossContact LX or CrossContact LX Sport?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 64 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, ContiCrossContact LX or CrossContact LX Sport?
Continental CrossContact LX Sport, 61 vs 56 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiCrossContact LX or CrossContact LX Sport?
Continental ContiCrossContact LX, 52 vs 40 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology