tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Defender LTX M/S vs Continental ContiCrossContact LX — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 10 + 35 owner reviews. How we score

Defender LTX M/S is ahead, 78–56

Check price on Amazon · Defender LTX M/S or ContiCrossContact LX on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Defender LTX M/S
Tire AMichelin

Defender LTX M/S

All Season

± 7Provisional

Tests – · 1 test Owners 82 · 10 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 78

    Dry

    Defender LTX M/S +21
    57
    Why this score
    SourceDefender LTX M/SContiCrossContact LX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online8352

    Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 74.5 (est.) + 40% × 83.3 = 78

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.5 = 57

    No road tests of dry for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 81

    Wet

    Defender LTX M/S +22
    59
    Why this score
    SourceDefender LTX M/SContiCrossContact LX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 78 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online8455

    Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 78.2 (est.) + 40% × 84.2 = 81

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 62.2 (est.) + 40% × 55.3 = 59

    No road tests of wet for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 74

    Snow

    Defender LTX M/S +14
    60
    Why this score
    SourceDefender LTX M/SContiCrossContact LX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7653

    Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 72.7 (est.) + 40% × 76 = 74

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 53.3 = 60

    No road tests of snow for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 75

    Comfort

    Defender LTX M/S +18
    57
    Why this score
    SourceDefender LTX M/SContiCrossContact LX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7851

    Defender LTX M/S: 40% × 70.7 (est.) + 60% × 77.6 = 75

    ContiCrossContact LX: 40% × 65.9 (est.) + 60% × 51.3 = 57

    No road tests of comfort for Defender LTX M/S or ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    64
    Why this score
    SourceDefender LTX M/SContiCrossContact LX
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–60

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.2 = 64

    No road tests of noise for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 79

    Treadwear

    Defender LTX M/S +27
    52
    Why this score
    SourceDefender LTX M/SContiCrossContact LX
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests75≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online8543

    Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 75.5 + 40% × 85.1 = 79

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 58 (est.) + 40% × 42.8 = 52

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 80

    Handling (owners)

    Defender LTX M/S +33
    47
    Why this score
    SourceDefender LTX M/SContiCrossContact LX
    Reviews found online8047
Scores at a glance
CategoryMichelin Defender LTX M/SContinental ContiCrossContact LX
Relative Score 78 56
Dry 78 57
Wet 81 59
Snow 74 60
Comfort 75 57
Noise – 64
Treadwear 79 52
Handling (owners) 80 47

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Defender LTX M/S

± 8

ContiCrossContact LX

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Defender LTX M/S

Pros

  • Exceptional tread longevity and mileage lifespan
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality at highway speeds
  • Strong year-round traction across dry, wet, and light snow conditions

Cons

  • High upfront purchase price
  • Subpar performance in deep mud, sand, and off-road environments
  • Limited ice and severe winter capability compared to dedicated winter tires
All owner themes in the Defender LTX M/S review

Tire B ContiCrossContact LX

Pros

  • Strong dry-road grip and handling performance
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality on pavement
  • Competitive price point compared to premium alternatives

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather performance, including hydroplaning and sliding
  • Inconsistent and often premature tread wear
  • Susceptibility to uneven wear patterns
All owner themes in the ContiCrossContact LX review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Defender LTX M/S B · Continental ContiCrossContact LX
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available—4
Rim diameters—16″ – 18″
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—680 A B
Treadwear warranty—65,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Defender LTX M/S

Continental ContiCrossContact LX

Winner: Michelin Defender LTX M/S — better handling, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Defender LTX M/S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 80 vs 47 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 79 vs 52 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 81 vs 59 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 78 vs 57 on dry.

Tire A · Michelin Defender LTX M/S
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Continental ContiCrossContact LX
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Defender LTX M/S or ContiCrossContact LX?

Which is better in the wet, Defender LTX M/S or ContiCrossContact LX?

Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 81 vs 59 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Defender LTX M/S or ContiCrossContact LX?

Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 78 vs 57 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Defender LTX M/S or ContiCrossContact LX?

Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 74 vs 60 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Defender LTX M/S or ContiCrossContact LX?

Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 75 vs 57 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Defender LTX M/S or ContiCrossContact LX?

Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 79 vs 52 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology