tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiCrossContact LX vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 19 road tests and 35 + 3,359 owner reviews. How we score

Ventus S1 evo3 is ahead, 70–57

Check price on Amazon · Ventus S1 evo3 or ContiCrossContact LX on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Tire BHankook

Ventus S1 evo3

Summer

± 5

Tests 78 · 19 tests Owners 56 · 3,359 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 45 in 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout (wet braking)

“Tire preferences? My MK8 has a little over 18,000 miles now and the stock tires look like they’ve already gone to sh*t? Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 aren’t as good as they advertise? What do you recommend for tires?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 57

    Dry

    Ventus S1 evo3 +18
    75
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXVentus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests≈ 61 (est.)86
    Reviews found online5260

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.5 = 57

    Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 85.5 + 40% × 60 = 75

    No road tests of dry for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 59

    Wet

    Ventus S1 evo3 +22
    81
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXVentus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests≈ 62 (est.)90
    Reviews found online5568

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 62.2 (est.) + 40% × 55.3 = 59

    Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 90.2 + 40% × 67.5 = 81

    No road tests of wet for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 60

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXVentus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)–
    Reviews found online53–

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 53.3 = 60

    No road tests of snow for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 57

    Comfort

    Ventus S1 evo3 +2
    59
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXVentus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 66 (est.)65
    Reviews found online5155

    ContiCrossContact LX: 40% × 65.9 (est.) + 60% × 51.3 = 57

    Ventus S1 evo3: 40% × 64.7 + 60% × 55.4 = 59

    No road tests of comfort for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 64

    Noise

    Ventus S1 evo3 +9
    73
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXVentus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests≈ 67 (est.)77
    Reviews found online60≈ 67 (est.)

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.2 = 64

    Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 77.3 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 73

    No road tests of noise for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for Ventus S1 evo3. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 52

    Treadwear

    Ventus S1 evo3 +1
    53
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXVentus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 58 (est.)61
    Reviews found online4340

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 58 (est.) + 40% × 42.8 = 52

    Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 60.7 + 40% × 40.4 = 53

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 47

    Handling (owners)

    Ventus S1 evo3 +11
    58
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXVentus S1 evo3
    Reviews found online4758
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    68
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXVentus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 15 tests–68
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ContiCrossContact LXHankook Ventus S1 evo3
Relative Score 57 70
Dry 57 75
Wet 59 81
Snow 60 –
Comfort 57 59
Noise 64 73
Treadwear 52 53
Handling (owners) 47 58
Efficiency – 68

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ContiCrossContact LX

± 5

Ventus S1 evo3

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiCrossContact LX

Pros

  • Strong dry-road grip and handling performance
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality on pavement
  • Competitive price point compared to premium alternatives

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather performance, including hydroplaning and sliding
  • Inconsistent and often premature tread wear
  • Susceptibility to uneven wear patterns
All owner themes in the ContiCrossContact LX review

Tire B Ventus S1 evo3

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in wet and dry conditions
  • Low road noise and high ride comfort
  • Competitive pricing compared to premium tier-one brands

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly on rear axles or heavy vehicles
  • Soft sidewalls leading to reduced steering feedback and precision
  • Vulnerability to sidewall damage or bubbling from potholes
All owner themes in the Ventus S1 evo3 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental ContiCrossContact LX

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3

Mixed

Community sentiment toward the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 3 is mixed, with users frequently praising its strong dry and wet grip, comfort, and competitive pricing. However, notable drawbacks include relatively fast tread wear, reports of increasing road noise over time, and mixed experiences with OEM specs versus premium competitors like Michelin.

teslamotorsclub.com ·1 upvote ·2023-01-26

“Nice. I'm in Texas, so I'm not sure if those (as all seasons) would be the best choice for me. I will never drive in snow/ice, and have been leaning towards the Hankook Ventus S1 EVO3 for my Model 3 AWD with 19" wheels. Those are the only Tesla OEM (I prefer the Tesla specs like acoustic lining, tread width, extra sidewall stability, etc.) summer tires in the 19" size.”
insideevsforum.com ·2022-12-19

“So, I was conversing on a Canadian EV group on Facebook and someone said their SE arrived with run flats…Hankook Ventus S1 evo3. My Mini also has Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 and I was not aware they are considered run flats. So I looked them up online and it appears that in 205/45R17 XL it says Run Flat…Y on . Was anyone else aware of this? Should it say run flat somewhere on the tire?”
jaguarforums.com

“I had Hankook tires on my XKR, and thought they were the noisiest tires I had ever heard on a car, and I had to get rid of them as I couldn't stand it.”
Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Value for money#Road noise levels#Tread wear and longevity#OEM fitments and EV variants#Run-flat identification confusion#Ride comfort

Based on 33 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4110
Rim diameters16″ – 18″17″ – 22″
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG680 A B—
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3

Winner: Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 — better wet, dry and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 81 vs 59 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 75 vs 57 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 58 vs 47 on handling.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 73 vs 64 on noise.

Tire A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiCrossContact LX or Ventus S1 evo3?

Which is better in the wet, ContiCrossContact LX or Ventus S1 evo3?

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3, 81 vs 59 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiCrossContact LX or Ventus S1 evo3?

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3, 75 vs 57 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, ContiCrossContact LX or Ventus S1 evo3?

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3, 73 vs 64 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiCrossContact LX or Ventus S1 evo3?

Neither, by our numbers: 57 vs 59 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, ContiCrossContact LX or Ventus S1 evo3?

Neither, by our numbers: 52 vs 53 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology