Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiCrossContact LX vs Yokohama Geolandar G91A — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 35 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

ContiCrossContact LX is ahead, 59–38

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 59

    Dry

    ContiCrossContact LX +22
    37
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXGeolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 49 (est.)
    Reviews found online5521

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 54.6 = 59

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 48.7 (est.) + 40% × 20.5 = 37

    No road tests of dry for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 61

    Wet

    ContiCrossContact LX +29
    32
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXGeolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 41 (est.)
    Reviews found online5919

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.5 = 61

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 41.3 (est.) + 40% × 18.9 = 32

    No road tests of wet for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 60

    Snow

    ContiCrossContact LX +12
    48
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXGeolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online5433

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 53.9 = 60

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 57.5 (est.) + 40% × 32.5 = 48

    No road tests of snow for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 62

    Comfort

    ContiCrossContact LX +21
    41
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXGeolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online5414

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.3 = 62

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 14.1 = 41

    No road tests of comfort for ContiCrossContact LX or Geolandar G91A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 66

    Noise

    ContiCrossContact LX +14
    52
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXGeolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6329

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.3 = 66

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 29 = 52

    No road tests of noise for ContiCrossContact LX or Geolandar G91A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 54

    Treadwear

    ContiCrossContact LX +15
    39
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXGeolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 52 (est.)
    Reviews found online4620

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 46.2 = 54

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 51.6 (est.) + 40% × 20.1 = 39

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 51

    Handling (owners)

    ContiCrossContact LX +28
    23
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXGeolandar G91A
    Reviews found online5123
Scores at a glance
Continental ContiCrossContact LX vs Yokohama Geolandar G91A: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiCrossContact LXYokohama Geolandar G91A
Relative Score 59 38
Dry 59 37
Wet 61 32
Snow 60 48
Comfort 62 41
Noise 66 52
Treadwear 54 39
Handling (owners) 51 23

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ContiCrossContact LX

Geolandar G91A

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiCrossContact LX

Pros

  • Strong dry-road grip and handling performance
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality on pavement
  • Competitive price point compared to premium alternatives

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather performance, including hydroplaning and sliding
  • Inconsistent and often premature tread wear
  • Susceptibility to uneven wear patterns
All owner themes in the ContiCrossContact LX review

Tire B Geolandar G91A

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX B · Yokohama Geolandar G91A
CategoryAll SeasonAll-Season tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available41
Rim diameters16″ – 18″17″
Tread depth10/32″10/32″
UTQG680 A B280 B A
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure44 psi44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX

Yokohama Geolandar G91A

Winner: Continental ContiCrossContact LX — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Geolandar G91A rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ContiCrossContact LX scores 61 vs 32 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental ContiCrossContact LX scores 51 vs 23 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ContiCrossContact LX scores 59 vs 37 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ContiCrossContact LX scores 62 vs 41 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G91A

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiCrossContact LX or Geolandar G91A?

Which is better in the wet, ContiCrossContact LX or Geolandar G91A?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX, 61 vs 32 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiCrossContact LX or Geolandar G91A?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX, 59 vs 37 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ContiCrossContact LX or Geolandar G91A?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX, 60 vs 48 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, ContiCrossContact LX or Geolandar G91A?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX, 66 vs 52 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiCrossContact LX or Geolandar G91A?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX, 62 vs 41 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiCrossContact LX or Geolandar G91A?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX, 54 vs 39 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology