tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiProContact SSR vs Michelin CrossClimate+ — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 13 road tests and 10 + 119 owner reviews. How we score

CrossClimate+ is ahead, 79–67

Check price on Amazon · CrossClimate+ or ContiProContact SSR on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin CrossClimate+
Tire BMichelin

CrossClimate+

All Season

± 5

Tests 81 · 13 tests Owners 78 · 119 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (dry handling)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    CrossClimate+ +21
    87
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRCrossClimate+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests≈ 67 (est.)94
    Reviews found online6578

    ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 66

    CrossClimate+: 60% × 93.7 + 40% × 78 = 87

    No road tests of dry for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 70

    Wet

    CrossClimate+ +11
    81
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRCrossClimate+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests≈ 70 (est.)81
    Reviews found online7081

    ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 69.7 = 70

    CrossClimate+: 60% × 80.9 + 40% × 81.3 = 81

    No road tests of wet for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 65

    Snow

    CrossClimate+ +4
    69
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRCrossClimate+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests≈ 68 (est.)65
    Reviews found online6273

    ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.1 = 65

    CrossClimate+: 60% × 65.5 + 40% × 73.2 = 69

    No road tests of snow for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 61

    Comfort

    CrossClimate+ +14
    75
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRCrossClimate+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)71
    Reviews found online5778

    ContiProContact SSR: 40% × 67 (est.) + 60% × 57.4 = 61

    CrossClimate+: 40% × 70.9 + 60% × 77.6 = 75

    No road tests of comfort for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    Level
    67
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRCrossClimate+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests≈ 67 (est.)68
    Reviews found online69≈ 67 (est.)

    ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 67

    CrossClimate+: 60% × 67.8 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 67

    No road tests of noise for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for CrossClimate+. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    CrossClimate+ +16
    82
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRCrossClimate+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 66 (est.)83
    Reviews found online6580

    ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 66

    CrossClimate+: 60% × 83.1 + 40% × 79.5 = 82

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    72
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRCrossClimate+
    Reviews found online–72
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    75
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRCrossClimate+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests–75
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ContiProContact SSRMichelin CrossClimate+
Relative Score 67 79
Dry 66 87
Wet 70 81
Snow 65 69
Comfort 61 75
Noise 67 67
Treadwear 66 82
Handling (owners) – 72
Efficiency – 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ContiProContact SSR

± 5

CrossClimate+

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiProContact SSR

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B CrossClimate+

Pros

  • Excellent traction and confidence in light to moderate snow and ice.
  • Strong wet and dry road handling that rivals dedicated summer tires.
  • Impressive tread longevity and durability over high mileage.

Cons

  • Performance in wet conditions can diminish significantly as the tire wears.
  • Increased road noise reported by some users compared to dedicated summer tires.
  • Occasional reports of a harsh or 'bouncy' ride on certain vehicle suspensions.
All owner themes in the CrossClimate+ review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiProContact SSR B · Michelin CrossClimate+
CategoryAll-Season tireAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available163
Rim diameters17″13″ – 19″
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG400 A A—
Treadwear warranty40,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiProContact SSR

Michelin CrossClimate+

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate+ — better dry, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ContiProContact SSR rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 87 vs 66 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 82 vs 66 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 75 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 81 vs 70 on wet.

Tire A · Continental ContiProContact SSR
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Michelin CrossClimate+
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiProContact SSR or CrossClimate+?

Which is better in the wet, ContiProContact SSR or CrossClimate+?

Michelin CrossClimate+, 81 vs 70 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiProContact SSR or CrossClimate+?

Michelin CrossClimate+, 87 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ContiProContact SSR or CrossClimate+?

Michelin CrossClimate+, 69 vs 65 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, ContiProContact SSR or CrossClimate+?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 67 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, ContiProContact SSR or CrossClimate+?

Michelin CrossClimate+, 75 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiProContact SSR or CrossClimate+?

Michelin CrossClimate+, 82 vs 66 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology