Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 79 reviews
Continental ContiProContact vs Continental ContiProContact SSR — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 79 + 10 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: ContiProContact 65, ContiProContact SSR 66.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 10 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
ContiProContact +265Why this score
Source ContiProContact ContiProContact SSR Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 66 64 ContiProContact: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 65.8 = 67
ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.9 = 65
No road tests of dry for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
65
Wet
ContiProContact SSR +570Why this score
Source ContiProContact ContiProContact SSR Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 63 69 ContiProContact: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 65
ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 70
No road tests of wet for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
62
Snow
ContiProContact SSR +365Why this score
Source ContiProContact ContiProContact SSR Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 56 61 ContiProContact: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.5 = 62
ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65
No road tests of snow for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
61
Comfort
ContiProContact +160Why this score
Source ContiProContact ContiProContact SSR Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 58 56 ContiProContact: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 58.1 = 61
ContiProContact SSR: 40% × 66.2 (est.) + 60% × 56.4 = 60
No road tests of comfort for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
68
Noise
ContiProContact +167Why this score
Source ContiProContact ContiProContact SSR Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 70 68 ContiProContact: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 68
ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 67
No road tests of noise for ContiProContact or ContiProContact SSR. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
62
Treadwear
ContiProContact SSR +466Why this score
Source ContiProContact ContiProContact SSR Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 60 66 ContiProContact: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 59.5 = 62
ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 65.5 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
62
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source ContiProContact ContiProContact SSR Reviews found online 62 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiProContact | Continental ContiProContact SSR |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 66 |
| Dry | 67 | 65 |
| Wet | 65 | 70 |
| Snow | 62 | 65 |
| Comfort | 61 | 60 |
| Noise | 68 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 62 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 62 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ContiProContact
ContiProContact SSR
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiProContact
Pros
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality
- Low road noise
- Strong dry and wet grip for most drivers
Cons
- Soft sidewalls susceptible to impact bubbles and damage from potholes
- Some complaints about poor wet traction and braking performance
- Faster-than-expected tread wear or chipping reported by a minority of users
Tire B ContiProContact SSR
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiProContact | B · Continental ContiProContact SSR |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 56 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 19″ | 17″ |
| Tread depth | 9 - 12/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 400 - 540 A - AA A | 400 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 40,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiProContact
Continental ContiProContact SSR
Too close to call: Continental ContiProContact and Continental ContiProContact SSR are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiProContact SSR is stronger on wet, treadwear and snow. Continental ContiProContact SSR rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental ContiProContact SSR scores 70 vs 65 on wet.
Continental ContiProContact SSR scores 66 vs 62 on treadwear.
Continental ContiProContact SSR scores 65 vs 62 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiProContact or ContiProContact SSR?
Which is better in the wet, ContiProContact or ContiProContact SSR?
Continental ContiProContact SSR, 70 vs 65 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiProContact or ContiProContact SSR?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 65 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, ContiProContact or ContiProContact SSR?
Continental ContiProContact SSR, 65 vs 62 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, ContiProContact or ContiProContact SSR?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 67 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, ContiProContact or ContiProContact SSR?
Neither, by our numbers: 61 vs 60 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, ContiProContact or ContiProContact SSR?
Continental ContiProContact SSR, 66 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology