Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiProContact vs Continental ContiProContact SSR — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 79 + 10 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: ContiProContact 65, ContiProContact SSR 66.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    ContiProContact +2
    65
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactContiProContact SSR
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6664

    ContiProContact: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 65.8 = 67

    ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.9 = 65

    No road tests of dry for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 65

    Wet

    ContiProContact SSR +5
    70
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactContiProContact SSR
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6369

    ContiProContact: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 65

    ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 70

    No road tests of wet for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 62

    Snow

    ContiProContact SSR +3
    65
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactContiProContact SSR
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5661

    ContiProContact: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.5 = 62

    ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65

    No road tests of snow for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 61

    Comfort

    ContiProContact +1
    60
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactContiProContact SSR
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5856

    ContiProContact: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 58.1 = 61

    ContiProContact SSR: 40% × 66.2 (est.) + 60% × 56.4 = 60

    No road tests of comfort for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 68

    Noise

    ContiProContact +1
    67
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactContiProContact SSR
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7068

    ContiProContact: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 68

    ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 67

    No road tests of noise for ContiProContact or ContiProContact SSR. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 62

    Treadwear

    ContiProContact SSR +4
    66
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactContiProContact SSR
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6066

    ContiProContact: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 59.5 = 62

    ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 65.5 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 62

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactContiProContact SSR
    Reviews found online62–
Scores at a glance
Continental ContiProContact vs Continental ContiProContact SSR: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiProContactContinental ContiProContact SSR
Relative Score 65 66
Dry 67 65
Wet 65 70
Snow 62 65
Comfort 61 60
Noise 68 67
Treadwear 62 66
Handling (owners) 62 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

ContiProContact

± 8

ContiProContact SSR

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiProContact

Pros

  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality
  • Low road noise
  • Strong dry and wet grip for most drivers

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls susceptible to impact bubbles and damage from potholes
  • Some complaints about poor wet traction and braking performance
  • Faster-than-expected tread wear or chipping reported by a minority of users
All owner themes in the ContiProContact review

Tire B ContiProContact SSR

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiProContact B · Continental ContiProContact SSR
CategoryAll-Season tireAll-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available561
Rim diameters15″ – 19″17″
Tread depth9 - 12/32″10/32″
UTQG400 - 540 A - AA A400 A A
Treadwear warranty—40,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure44 - 51 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiProContact

Continental ContiProContact SSR

Too close to call: Continental ContiProContact and Continental ContiProContact SSR are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiProContact SSR is stronger on wet, treadwear and snow. Continental ContiProContact SSR rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ContiProContact SSR scores 70 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Continental ContiProContact SSR scores 66 vs 62 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Continental ContiProContact SSR scores 65 vs 62 on snow.

Tire A · Continental ContiProContact
Tire B · Continental ContiProContact SSR

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiProContact or ContiProContact SSR?

Which is better in the wet, ContiProContact or ContiProContact SSR?

Continental ContiProContact SSR, 70 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiProContact or ContiProContact SSR?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 65 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, ContiProContact or ContiProContact SSR?

Continental ContiProContact SSR, 65 vs 62 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, ContiProContact or ContiProContact SSR?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 67 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, ContiProContact or ContiProContact SSR?

Neither, by our numbers: 61 vs 60 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, ContiProContact or ContiProContact SSR?

Continental ContiProContact SSR, 66 vs 62 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology