tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiProContact SSR vs Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 10 + 12 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport PS2 ZP is ahead, 73–62

Check price on Amazon · Pilot Sport PS2 ZP or ContiProContact SSR on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 62

    Dry

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP +13
    75
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRPilot Sport PS2 ZP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online5979

    ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 58.5 = 62

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 78.9 = 75

    No road tests of dry for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Pilot Sport PS2 ZP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 65

    Wet

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP +11
    76
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRPilot Sport PS2 ZP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 75 (est.)
    Reviews found online6378

    ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 65

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: 60% × 74.5 (est.) + 40% × 78.2 = 76

    No road tests of wet for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Pilot Sport PS2 ZP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 61

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRPilot Sport PS2 ZP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)–
    Reviews found online55–

    ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 55 = 61

    No road tests of snow for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 59

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP +11
    70
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRPilot Sport PS2 ZP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online4970

    ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 48.9 = 59

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for ContiProContact SSR or Pilot Sport PS2 ZP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 65

    Noise

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP +4
    69
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRPilot Sport PS2 ZP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6271

    ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 65

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.5 = 69

    No road tests of noise for ContiProContact SSR or Pilot Sport PS2 ZP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 62

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP +3
    65
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRPilot Sport PS2 ZP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online5964

    ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 58.9 = 62

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport PS2 ZP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 54

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP +23
    77
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRPilot Sport PS2 ZP
    Reviews found online5477
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ContiProContact SSRMichelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP
Relative Score 62 73
Dry 62 75
Wet 65 76
Snow 61 –
Comfort 59 70
Noise 65 69
Treadwear 62 65
Handling (owners) 54 77

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ContiProContact SSR

Pilot Sport PS2 ZP

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiProContact SSR

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Pilot Sport PS2 ZP

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip with a glued-to-the-road feel
  • Improved ride comfort and lower cabin noise compared to standard run-flats
  • Predictable handling with gentle breakaway characteristics near limits

Cons

  • Stiff or rock-hard ride quality when kept at recommended manufacturer pressures
  • Softer sidewalls can introduce a spongy or wobbly feel during rapid direction changes on certain vehicles
  • Frustrating warranty terms for staggered setups
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport PS2 ZP review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiProContact SSR B · Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP
CategoryAll-Season tireSummer Max Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG400 A A—
Treadwear warranty40,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiProContact SSR

Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ContiProContact SSR rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP scores 77 vs 54 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP scores 75 vs 62 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP scores 76 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP scores 70 vs 59 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental ContiProContact SSR
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiProContact SSR or Pilot Sport PS2 ZP?

Which is better in the wet, ContiProContact SSR or Pilot Sport PS2 ZP?

Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP, 76 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiProContact SSR or Pilot Sport PS2 ZP?

Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP, 75 vs 62 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, ContiProContact SSR or Pilot Sport PS2 ZP?

Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP, 69 vs 65 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiProContact SSR or Pilot Sport PS2 ZP?

Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP, 70 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiProContact SSR or Pilot Sport PS2 ZP?

Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP, 65 vs 62 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology