Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiProContact SSR vs Yokohama AVID ENVigor — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 10 + 72 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: ContiProContact SSR and AVID ENVigor are level at 66.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama AVID ENVigor
Tire BYokohama

AVID ENVigor

All Season High Performance tires

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 72 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    AVID ENVigor +3
    68
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRAVID ENVigor
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6468

    ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.9 = 65

    AVID ENVigor: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.7 = 68

    No road tests of dry for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for AVID ENVigor. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 70

    Wet

    Level
    70
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRAVID ENVigor
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6970

    ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 70

    AVID ENVigor: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 70

    No road tests of wet for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for AVID ENVigor. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 65

    Snow

    ContiProContact SSR +5
    60
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRAVID ENVigor
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6152

    ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65

    AVID ENVigor: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 52.2 = 60

    No road tests of snow for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for AVID ENVigor. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 60

    Comfort

    AVID ENVigor +2
    62
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRAVID ENVigor
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5659

    ContiProContact SSR: 40% × 66.2 (est.) + 60% × 56.3 = 60

    AVID ENVigor: 40% × 66.7 (est.) + 60% × 59 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for AVID ENVigor. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 67

    Noise

    ContiProContact SSR +2
    65
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRAVID ENVigor
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6864

    ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.2 = 67

    AVID ENVigor: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65

    No road tests of noise for ContiProContact SSR or AVID ENVigor. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    ContiProContact SSR +2
    64
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRAVID ENVigor
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6563

    ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 66

    AVID ENVigor: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 63 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for AVID ENVigor. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    62
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRAVID ENVigor
    Reviews found online–62
Scores at a glance
Continental ContiProContact SSR vs Yokohama AVID ENVigor: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiProContact SSRYokohama AVID ENVigor
Relative Score 66 66
Dry 65 68
Wet 70 70
Snow 65 60
Comfort 60 62
Noise 67 65
Treadwear 66 64
Handling (owners) – 62

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ContiProContact SSR

± 7

AVID ENVigor

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiProContact SSR

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B AVID ENVigor

Pros

  • Smooth and exceptionally quiet ride comfort
  • Great value and competitive pricing
  • Strong dry and wet weather traction and handling

Cons

  • Subpar grip in snow and winter conditions
  • Minor noise reported at specific mid-range speeds by some users
  • Product line has been discontinued by Yokohama, making replacements harder to find
All owner themes in the AVID ENVigor review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiProContact SSR B · Yokohama AVID ENVigor
CategoryAll-Season tireAll Season High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth10/32″10/32″
UTQG400 A A560 A A
Treadwear warranty40,000 mi60,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiProContact SSR

Yokohama AVID ENVigor

Too close to call: Continental ContiProContact SSR and Yokohama AVID ENVigor are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiProContact SSR is stronger on snow. Yokohama AVID ENVigor is stronger on dry. Continental ContiProContact SSR rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Continental ContiProContact SSR scores 65 vs 60 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama AVID ENVigor scores 68 vs 65 on dry.

Tire A · Continental ContiProContact SSR
Tire B · Yokohama AVID ENVigor

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiProContact SSR or AVID ENVigor?

Which is better in the wet, ContiProContact SSR or AVID ENVigor?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 70 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiProContact SSR or AVID ENVigor?

Yokohama AVID ENVigor, 68 vs 65 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ContiProContact SSR or AVID ENVigor?

Continental ContiProContact SSR, 65 vs 60 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, ContiProContact SSR or AVID ENVigor?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 65 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, ContiProContact SSR or AVID ENVigor?

Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 62 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, ContiProContact SSR or AVID ENVigor?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 64 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology