Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 10 reviews
Continental ContiProContact SSR vs Yokohama AVID ENVigor — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 10 + 72 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: ContiProContact SSR and AVID ENVigor are level at 66.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 72 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
AVID ENVigor +368Why this score
Source ContiProContact SSR AVID ENVigor Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 64 68 ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.9 = 65
AVID ENVigor: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.7 = 68
No road tests of dry for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for AVID ENVigor. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
70
Wet
Level70Why this score
Source ContiProContact SSR AVID ENVigor Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 69 70 ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 70
AVID ENVigor: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 70
No road tests of wet for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for AVID ENVigor. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
65
Snow
ContiProContact SSR +560Why this score
Source ContiProContact SSR AVID ENVigor Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 61 52 ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65
AVID ENVigor: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 52.2 = 60
No road tests of snow for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for AVID ENVigor. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
60
Comfort
AVID ENVigor +262Why this score
Source ContiProContact SSR AVID ENVigor Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 56 59 ContiProContact SSR: 40% × 66.2 (est.) + 60% × 56.3 = 60
AVID ENVigor: 40% × 66.7 (est.) + 60% × 59 = 62
No road tests of comfort for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for AVID ENVigor. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
67
Noise
ContiProContact SSR +265Why this score
Source ContiProContact SSR AVID ENVigor Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 68 64 ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.2 = 67
AVID ENVigor: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65
No road tests of noise for ContiProContact SSR or AVID ENVigor. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Treadwear
ContiProContact SSR +264Why this score
Source ContiProContact SSR AVID ENVigor Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 65 63 ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 66
AVID ENVigor: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 63 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for AVID ENVigor. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison62Why this score
Source ContiProContact SSR AVID ENVigor Reviews found online – 62
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiProContact SSR | Yokohama AVID ENVigor |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 66 |
| Dry | 65 | 68 |
| Wet | 70 | 70 |
| Snow | 65 | 60 |
| Comfort | 60 | 62 |
| Noise | 67 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ContiProContact SSR
AVID ENVigor
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiProContact SSR
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B AVID ENVigor
Pros
- Smooth and exceptionally quiet ride comfort
- Great value and competitive pricing
- Strong dry and wet weather traction and handling
Cons
- Subpar grip in snow and winter conditions
- Minor noise reported at specific mid-range speeds by some users
- Product line has been discontinued by Yokohama, making replacements harder to find
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiProContact SSR | B · Yokohama AVID ENVigor |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All Season High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 400 A A | 560 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 40,000 mi | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiProContact SSR
Yokohama AVID ENVigor
Too close to call: Continental ContiProContact SSR and Yokohama AVID ENVigor are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiProContact SSR is stronger on snow. Yokohama AVID ENVigor is stronger on dry. Continental ContiProContact SSR rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental ContiProContact SSR scores 65 vs 60 on snow.
Yokohama AVID ENVigor scores 68 vs 65 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiProContact SSR or AVID ENVigor?
Which is better in the wet, ContiProContact SSR or AVID ENVigor?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 70 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiProContact SSR or AVID ENVigor?
Yokohama AVID ENVigor, 68 vs 65 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ContiProContact SSR or AVID ENVigor?
Continental ContiProContact SSR, 65 vs 60 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, ContiProContact SSR or AVID ENVigor?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 65 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, ContiProContact SSR or AVID ENVigor?
Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 62 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, ContiProContact SSR or AVID ENVigor?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 64 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology