Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 vs Dunlop RoadSmart III — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 1 + 16 owner reviews. How we score

RoadSmart III is ahead, 80–71

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental ContiRoadAttack 3
± 7Provisional

Tests 73 · 1 test Owners 70 · 1 review

Best test result: #1 of 6 in 2020 Motorcycle Sports Touring Tyre Test (dry braking)

Dunlop RoadSmart III
Tire BDunlop

RoadSmart III

Summer

± 7Provisional

Tests 72 · 1 test Owners 85 · 16 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 6 in 2020 Motorcycle Sports Touring Tyre Test (dry braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    RoadSmart III +4
    77
    Why this score
    SourceContiRoadAttack 3RoadSmart III
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests7372
    Reviews found online7285
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%99%

    ContiRoadAttack 3: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 71.7 = 73

    RoadSmart III: 60% × 72.1 + 40% × 85.3 = 77

  2. 74

    Wet

    RoadSmart III +9
    83
    Why this score
    SourceContiRoadAttack 3RoadSmart III
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 80 (est.)
    Reviews found online7587

    ContiRoadAttack 3: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    RoadSmart III: 60% × 79.8 (est.) + 40% × 87.4 = 83

    No road tests of wet for ContiRoadAttack 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for RoadSmart III. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 67

    Comfort

    RoadSmart III +11
    78
    Why this score
    SourceContiRoadAttack 3RoadSmart III
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online6682

    ContiRoadAttack 3: 40% × 68.1 (est.) + 60% × 65.9 = 67

    RoadSmart III: 40% × 71.3 (est.) + 60% × 81.9 = 78

    No road tests of comfort for ContiRoadAttack 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for RoadSmart III. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 65

    Treadwear

    RoadSmart III +11
    76
    Why this score
    SourceContiRoadAttack 3RoadSmart III
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online6483

    ContiRoadAttack 3: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 65

    RoadSmart III: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 82.5 = 76

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiRoadAttack 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for RoadSmart III. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  5. 71

    Handling (owners)

    RoadSmart III +15
    86
    Why this score
    SourceContiRoadAttack 3RoadSmart III
    Reviews found online7186
Scores at a glance
Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 vs Dunlop RoadSmart III: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiRoadAttack 3Dunlop RoadSmart III
Relative Score 71 80
Dry 73 77
Wet 74 83
Comfort 67 78
Treadwear 65 76
Handling (owners) 71 86

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

ContiRoadAttack 3

± 7

RoadSmart III

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 finished ahead 0 times and Dunlop RoadSmart III 1 times.

DisciplineCategoryContiRoadAttack 3RoadSmart IIIΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 100% 99% +0.7 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Motorcycle Sports Touring Tyre Test · 180/55 R17
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #4/6 #2/6 – 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Motorcycle Sports Touring Tyre Test · 180/55 R17

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiRoadAttack 3

Pros

  • Excellent grip and performance on paved surfaces
  • High level of rider confidence
  • Well-suited for sport-touring applications

Cons

  • Not suitable for off-road or gravel terrain
  • Susceptible to rapid tread damage when used on unpaved surfaces
All owner themes in the ContiRoadAttack 3 review

Tire B RoadSmart III

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and mileage compared to dedicated sport tires.
  • Sharp, responsive steering and handling characteristics.
  • Consistent and reliable grip in both dry and wet road conditions.

Cons

  • Occasional reports of rear-end slippage during aggressive cornering with power input.
  • Front tire wear can be uneven or faster than expected depending on suspension setup.
  • Some users noted a firm ride quality due to the stiff carcass construction.
All owner themes in the RoadSmart III review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 B · Dunlop RoadSmart III
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typeMotorcycleMotorcycle

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiRoadAttack 3

Dunlop RoadSmart III

Winner: Dunlop RoadSmart III — better handling, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional. Dunlop RoadSmart III rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Dunlop RoadSmart III scores 86 vs 71 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Dunlop RoadSmart III scores 78 vs 67 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Dunlop RoadSmart III scores 76 vs 65 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Dunlop RoadSmart III scores 83 vs 74 on wet.

Tire A · Continental ContiRoadAttack 3
Tire B · Dunlop RoadSmart III

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiRoadAttack 3 or RoadSmart III?

Which is better in the wet, ContiRoadAttack 3 or RoadSmart III?

Dunlop RoadSmart III, 83 vs 74 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiRoadAttack 3 or RoadSmart III?

Dunlop RoadSmart III, 77 vs 73 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiRoadAttack 3 or RoadSmart III?

Dunlop RoadSmart III, 78 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiRoadAttack 3 or RoadSmart III?

Dunlop RoadSmart III, 76 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology