Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 vs Michelin Road 5 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 1 + 24 owner reviews. How we score

Road 5 leads, 75–71 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental ContiRoadAttack 3
± 7Provisional

Tests 73 · 1 test Owners 70 · 1 review

Best test result: #1 of 6 in 2020 Motorcycle Sports Touring Tyre Test (dry braking)

Michelin Road 5
Tire BMichelin

Road 5

Summer

± 8

Tests 67 · 1 test Owners 79 · 24 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    ContiRoadAttack 3 +1
    72
    Why this score
    SourceContiRoadAttack 3Road 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests7367
    Reviews found online7278
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%97%

    ContiRoadAttack 3: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 71.7 = 73

    Road 5: 60% × 67.3 + 40% × 78.2 = 72

  2. 74

    Wet

    Road 5 +6
    80
    Why this score
    SourceContiRoadAttack 3Road 5
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 77 (est.)
    Reviews found online7583

    ContiRoadAttack 3: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    Road 5: 60% × 77.4 (est.) + 40% × 82.9 = 80

    No road tests of wet for ContiRoadAttack 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Road 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 67

    Comfort

    Road 5 +9
    76
    Why this score
    SourceContiRoadAttack 3Road 5
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online6679

    ContiRoadAttack 3: 40% × 68.1 (est.) + 60% × 65.9 = 67

    Road 5: 40% × 70.8 (est.) + 60% × 79.2 = 76

    No road tests of comfort for ContiRoadAttack 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Road 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 65

    Treadwear

    Road 5 +7
    72
    Why this score
    SourceContiRoadAttack 3Road 5
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6475

    ContiRoadAttack 3: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 65

    Road 5: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiRoadAttack 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Road 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  5. 71

    Handling (owners)

    Road 5 +6
    77
    Why this score
    SourceContiRoadAttack 3Road 5
    Reviews found online7177
Scores at a glance
Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 vs Michelin Road 5: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiRoadAttack 3Michelin Road 5
Relative Score 71 75
Dry 73 72
Wet 74 80
Comfort 67 76
Treadwear 65 72
Handling (owners) 71 77

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

ContiRoadAttack 3

± 8

Road 5

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 finished ahead 1 times and Michelin Road 5 0 times.

DisciplineCategoryContiRoadAttack 3Road 5ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 100% 97% +2.7 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Motorcycle Sports Touring Tyre Test · 180/55 R17
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #4/6 #5/6 – 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Motorcycle Sports Touring Tyre Test · 180/55 R17

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiRoadAttack 3

Pros

  • Excellent grip and performance on paved surfaces
  • High level of rider confidence
  • Well-suited for sport-touring applications

Cons

  • Not suitable for off-road or gravel terrain
  • Susceptible to rapid tread damage when used on unpaved surfaces
All owner themes in the ContiRoadAttack 3 review

Tire B Road 5

Pros

  • Class-leading wet weather grip and rider confidence
  • Excellent tread life and durability for touring applications
  • Dual-compound construction provides a balance of stability and cornering grip

Cons

  • High susceptibility to punctures from road debris
  • Soft carcass construction can be prone to structural damage from impacts
  • Some users report a lack of feedback compared to dedicated sport tires
All owner themes in the Road 5 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 B · Michelin Road 5
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typeMotorcycleMotorcycle

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiRoadAttack 3

Michelin Road 5

Narrow edge: Michelin Road 5 — better comfort, treadwear and wet. Where the Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Road 5 scores 76 vs 67 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Road 5 scores 72 vs 65 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Road 5 scores 80 vs 74 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Road 5 scores 77 vs 71 on handling.

Tire A · Continental ContiRoadAttack 3
Tire B · Michelin Road 5

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiRoadAttack 3 or Road 5?

Which is better in the wet, ContiRoadAttack 3 or Road 5?

Michelin Road 5, 80 vs 74 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiRoadAttack 3 or Road 5?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 72 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, ContiRoadAttack 3 or Road 5?

Michelin Road 5, 76 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiRoadAttack 3 or Road 5?

Michelin Road 5, 72 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology