Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiSportContact 3 vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 11 road tests and 16 + 2,129 owner reviews. How we score

Ventus S1 evo2 is ahead, 72–61

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
Tire BHankook

Ventus S1 evo2

Summer

Tests 79 · 11 tests Owners 67 · 2,129 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test (dry braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 62

    Dry

    Ventus S1 evo2 +12
    74
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 3Ventus S1 evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 11 tests≈ 64 (est.)77
    Reviews found online5970

    ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 58.7 = 62

    Ventus S1 evo2: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 70 = 74

    No road tests of dry for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 64

    Wet

    Ventus S1 evo2 +15
    79
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 3Ventus S1 evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 11 tests≈ 66 (est.)83
    Reviews found online6273

    ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64

    Ventus S1 evo2: 60% × 83.3 + 40% × 73.4 = 79

    No road tests of wet for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 45

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 3Ventus S1 evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 55 (est.)–
    Reviews found online30–

    ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 55.5 (est.) + 40% × 29.8 = 45

    No road tests of snow for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 57

    Comfort

    Ventus S1 evo2 +9
    66
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 3Ventus S1 evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)72
    Reviews found online5263

    ContiSportContact 3: 40% × 65.9 (est.) + 60% × 51.8 = 57

    Ventus S1 evo2: 40% × 71.7 + 60% × 62.8 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 60

    Noise

    Ventus S1 evo2 +12
    72
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 3Ventus S1 evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 67 (est.)76
    Reviews found online51≈ 67 (est.)

    ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 50.6 = 60

    Ventus S1 evo2: 60% × 75.9 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 72

    No road tests of noise for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for Ventus S1 evo2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 56

    Treadwear

    Ventus S1 evo2 +5
    61
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 3Ventus S1 evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online5057

    ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 49.7 = 56

    Ventus S1 evo2: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 57.2 = 61

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ventus S1 evo2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    68
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 3Ventus S1 evo2
    Reviews found online–68
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    72
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 3Ventus S1 evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests–72
Scores at a glance
Continental ContiSportContact 3 vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiSportContact 3Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
Relative Score 61 72
Dry 62 74
Wet 64 79
Snow 45 –
Comfort 57 66
Noise 60 72
Treadwear 56 61
Handling (owners) – 68
Efficiency – 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score

ContiSportContact 3

Ventus S1 evo2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiSportContact 3

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Ventus S1 evo2

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet grip performance
  • Strong value compared to premium alternatives like Michelin or Continental
  • Crisp steering response and confident cornering handling

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly on heavier or high-performance vehicles
  • Increased road noise and harsher ride quality as the tire ages and tread depth lowers
  • Occasional reports of structural weaknesses such as sidewall bulges or cracking
All owner themes in the Ventus S1 evo2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiSportContact 3 B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
CategorySummer tireSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available2261
Rim diameters16″ – 20″16″ – 20″
Tread depth9 - 10/32″—
UTQG280 A - B A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—
Sizes in common1414

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiSportContact 3

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2

Winner: Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 — better wet, dry and noise. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ContiSportContact 3 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 scores 79 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 scores 74 vs 62 on dry.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 scores 72 vs 60 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 scores 66 vs 57 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental ContiSportContact 3
Tire B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiSportContact 3 or Ventus S1 evo2?

Which is better in the wet, ContiSportContact 3 or Ventus S1 evo2?

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2, 79 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSportContact 3 or Ventus S1 evo2?

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2, 74 vs 62 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, ContiSportContact 3 or Ventus S1 evo2?

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2, 72 vs 60 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiSportContact 3 or Ventus S1 evo2?

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2, 66 vs 57 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiSportContact 3 or Ventus S1 evo2?

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2, 61 vs 56 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology