Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 16 reviews
Continental ContiSportContact 3 vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 11 road tests and 16 + 2,129 owner reviews. How we score
Ventus S1 evo2 is ahead, 72–61
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 79 · 11 tests Owners 67 · 2,129 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test (dry braking)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
62
Dry
Ventus S1 evo2 +1274Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 3 Ventus S1 evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 11 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 77 Reviews found online 59 70 ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 58.7 = 62
Ventus S1 evo2: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 70 = 74
No road tests of dry for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
64
Wet
Ventus S1 evo2 +1579Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 3 Ventus S1 evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 11 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 83 Reviews found online 62 73 ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64
Ventus S1 evo2: 60% × 83.3 + 40% × 73.4 = 79
No road tests of wet for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
45
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 3 Ventus S1 evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 55 (est.) – Reviews found online 30 – ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 55.5 (est.) + 40% × 29.8 = 45
No road tests of snow for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
57
Comfort
Ventus S1 evo2 +966Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 3 Ventus S1 evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 72 Reviews found online 52 63 ContiSportContact 3: 40% × 65.9 (est.) + 60% × 51.8 = 57
Ventus S1 evo2: 40% × 71.7 + 60% × 62.8 = 66
No road tests of comfort for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
60
Noise
Ventus S1 evo2 +1272Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 3 Ventus S1 evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 76 Reviews found online 51 ≈ 67 (est.) ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 50.6 = 60
Ventus S1 evo2: 60% × 75.9 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 72
No road tests of noise for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Ventus S1 evo2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
56
Treadwear
Ventus S1 evo2 +561Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 3 Ventus S1 evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 50 57 ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 49.7 = 56
Ventus S1 evo2: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 57.2 = 61
No road tests of treadwear for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus S1 evo2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison68Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 3 Ventus S1 evo2 Reviews found online – 68 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison72Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 3 Ventus S1 evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests – 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSportContact 3 | Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 61 | 72 |
| Dry | 62 | 74 |
| Wet | 64 | 79 |
| Snow | 45 | – |
| Comfort | 57 | 66 |
| Noise | 60 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 56 | 61 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 68 |
| Efficiency | – | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ContiSportContact 3
Ventus S1 evo2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiSportContact 3
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Ventus S1 evo2
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet grip performance
- Strong value compared to premium alternatives like Michelin or Continental
- Crisp steering response and confident cornering handling
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly on heavier or high-performance vehicles
- Increased road noise and harsher ride quality as the tire ages and tread depth lowers
- Occasional reports of structural weaknesses such as sidewall bulges or cracking
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSportContact 3 | B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 22 | 61 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | 16″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 280 A - B A | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 14 | 14 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiSportContact 3
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
Winner: Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 — better wet, dry and noise. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ContiSportContact 3 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 scores 79 vs 64 on wet.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 scores 74 vs 62 on dry.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 scores 72 vs 60 on noise.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 scores 66 vs 57 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiSportContact 3 or Ventus S1 evo2?
Which is better in the wet, ContiSportContact 3 or Ventus S1 evo2?
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2, 79 vs 64 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSportContact 3 or Ventus S1 evo2?
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2, 74 vs 62 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, ContiSportContact 3 or Ventus S1 evo2?
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2, 72 vs 60 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiSportContact 3 or Ventus S1 evo2?
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2, 66 vs 57 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiSportContact 3 or Ventus S1 evo2?
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2, 61 vs 56 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology