tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR vs Falken Azenis FK510 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 31 road tests and 14 + 907 owner reviews. How we score

Azenis FK510 is ahead, 71–58

Check price on Amazon · Azenis FK510 or ContiSportContact 5 SSR on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken Azenis FK510
Tire BFalken

Azenis FK510

Summer

± 5

Tests 74 · 31 tests Owners 66 · 907 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test (wet braking)

“I have Fallen FK510s and live where it rains 300 days a year, they perform great and I'm sure the 520 is even better”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 58

    Dry

    Azenis FK510 +16
    74
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5 SSRAzenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 28 tests≈ 61 (est.)73
    Reviews found online5275

    ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 58

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 75.4 = 74

    No road tests of dry for ContiSportContact 5 SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 63

    Wet

    Azenis FK510 +22
    85
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5 SSRAzenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 29 tests≈ 65 (est.)89
    Reviews found online6078

    ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 60 = 63

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 89 + 40% × 78.3 = 85

    No road tests of wet for ContiSportContact 5 SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 56

    Snow

    ContiSportContact 5 SSR +1
    55
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5 SSRAzenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online4846

    ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 60% × 62.1 (est.) + 40% × 47.5 = 56

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 55

    No road tests of snow for ContiSportContact 5 SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Azenis FK510. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 50

    Comfort

    Azenis FK510 +7
    57
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5 SSRAzenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 64 (est.)42
    Reviews found online4068

    ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 40% × 63.8 (est.) + 60% × 40.4 = 50

    Azenis FK510: 40% × 41.7 + 60% × 67.6 = 57

    No road tests of comfort for ContiSportContact 5 SSR. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 62

    Noise

    Azenis FK510 +5
    67
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5 SSRAzenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests≈ 67 (est.)66
    Reviews found online5667

    ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 56.2 = 62

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 66 + 40% × 67.3 = 67

    No road tests of noise for ContiSportContact 5 SSR. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 50

    Treadwear

    Azenis FK510 +16
    66
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5 SSRAzenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 57 (est.)73
    Reviews found online4054

    ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 60% × 56.9 (est.) + 40% × 39.6 = 50

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 54.2 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiSportContact 5 SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    72
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5 SSRAzenis FK510
    Reviews found online–72
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    51
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5 SSRAzenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 19 tests–51
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ContiSportContact 5 SSRFalken Azenis FK510
Relative Score 58 71
Dry 58 74
Wet 63 85
Snow 56 55
Comfort 50 57
Noise 62 67
Treadwear 50 66
Handling (owners) – 72
Efficiency – 51

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ContiSportContact 5 SSR

± 5

Azenis FK510

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiSportContact 5 SSR

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Azenis FK510

Pros

  • Outstanding grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality that absorbs road imperfections well

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
  • Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a feeling of looseness during aggressive high-speed maneuvers
  • Occasional reports of increased tire noise or harshness on specific rough or concrete road surfaces
All owner themes in the Azenis FK510 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Falken Azenis FK510

Mixed

Community members frequently view the Falken Azenis FK510 as an affordable, budget-friendly alternative to premium tires like Michelin Pilot Sports, offering strong wet weather grip and good everyday road comfort. However, opinions are mixed due to rapid treadwear, with multiple drivers reporting bald tires in 10,000 to 15,000 miles or poor durability during track and autocross sessions. Furthermore, some users note compromises in steering response, road noise, and overall performance compared to top-tier max performance tires.

r/TeslaModelS ·1 upvote ·2025-11-28

“2022 MS Plaid on 21" archnids. Factory Michelins replaced at 7,500 miles (at wear markers). FK510's after 9,000 miles on the rubber are at 7/32. Expecting another 5,000 miles or so. They're comparable treadwear rating but last longer. Heavy car with lots of torque will inevitably go through tires sooner than the rated mileage. I'm fortunate to have decent alignment from the factory as the wear was even. Good luck on the next set of tires.”
corvetteforum.com

“I purchased a full set of Falken Azenis FK510 tires in January of last year. Ride, quietness, and wet/dry handling were all right on the money with the Tire Rack and other reviews that I looked over when deciding which tires to buy. Now I'm wishing I'd gone ahead and spent the extra money to get another set of Michelins. The rear tires are completely worn down now after only daily driving the car and putting maybe 15k miles on the tires. The same driving conditions with the previous Michelin PSIII tires resulted in the tires lasting for 5 years and 50k miles. Tread wear is the only complaint I have with these tires, but it is one massive issue with tires only lasting 15k miles with tame daily driving. My advice is to spend the extra money and get the Michelin tires. That's what I'll be doing this weekend.”
r/Mustang ·1 upvote ·2025-12-28

“Accidentally bought a Falken FK510 at discount tire when my other rear tire is a FK460A/S I have a brand new 460A/S on my driver rear a week ago and I went to discount yesterday and accidentally bought the 510 for my passenger rear. My biggest concerns is the difference in grip and wear and for the torsen limited slip on my GT PP1. I just daily my car to work and floor it at lights and don’t do canyon or track runs. I saw discount tire has a return / exchange policy, has anyone gone this route?”
Top themes
#budget friendly pricing#wet weather traction#fast treadwear#track durability concerns#ride comfort#cabin road noise#daily street driving

Based on 63 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR B · Falken Azenis FK510
CategorySummer tireSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available2593
Rim diameters17″ – 20″17″ – 22″
Tread depth9/32″10/32″
UTQG280 - 420 A - AA A300 A A
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure50 - 51 psi50 psi
Sizes in common1818

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR

Falken Azenis FK510

Winner: Falken Azenis FK510 — better wet, dry and treadwear. Where the Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 85 vs 63 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 74 vs 58 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 66 vs 50 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 57 vs 50 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Falken Azenis FK510
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiSportContact 5 SSR or Azenis FK510?

Which is better in the wet, ContiSportContact 5 SSR or Azenis FK510?

Falken Azenis FK510, 85 vs 63 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSportContact 5 SSR or Azenis FK510?

Falken Azenis FK510, 74 vs 58 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ContiSportContact 5 SSR or Azenis FK510?

Neither, by our numbers: 56 vs 55 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, ContiSportContact 5 SSR or Azenis FK510?

Falken Azenis FK510, 67 vs 62 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiSportContact 5 SSR or Azenis FK510?

Falken Azenis FK510, 57 vs 50 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiSportContact 5 SSR or Azenis FK510?

Falken Azenis FK510, 66 vs 50 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology