Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV vs Pirelli Scorpion Verde — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 4 road tests and 39 + 1,302 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: ContiSportContact 5 SUV and Scorpion Verde are level at 63.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV
± 6

Tests 76 · 1 test Owners 49 · 39 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test (dry braking)

Pirelli Scorpion Verde
Tire BPirelli

Scorpion Verde

Summer

± 7

Tests 68 · 4 tests Owners 57 · 1,302 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test (wet braking)

“My mom's mercedes GLC300 came with pirelli scorpion Verde tires and they have 1/32" measured left on the wear bars after less than 30k miles. My mother drives like a grandma too. They're fine for turns and pep on Florida roads but absurdly short wear time.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    ContiSportContact 5 SUV +5
    64
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5 SUVScorpion Verde
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 4 tests7869
    Reviews found online5656
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%94%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%98%

    ContiSportContact 5 SUV: 60% × 78.4 + 40% × 55.5 = 69

    Scorpion Verde: 60% × 68.7 + 40% × 56.3 = 64

  2. 70

    Wet

    ContiSportContact 5 SUV +3
    67
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5 SUVScorpion Verde
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 4 tests7670
    Reviews found online6161
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–196%96%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–199%100%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%94%

    ContiSportContact 5 SUV: 60% × 75.7 + 40% × 60.6 = 70

    Scorpion Verde: 60% × 70.3 + 40% × 61.1 = 67

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    64
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5 SUVScorpion Verde
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–61

    Scorpion Verde: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 64

    No road tests of snow for Scorpion Verde. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 53

    Comfort

    Scorpion Verde +3
    56
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5 SUVScorpion Verde
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 65 (est.)53
    Reviews found online4659

    ContiSportContact 5 SUV: 40% × 64.9 (est.) + 60% × 45.9 = 53

    Scorpion Verde: 40% × 52.5 + 60% × 58.6 = 56

    No road tests of comfort for ContiSportContact 5 SUV. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 69

    Noise

    ContiSportContact 5 SUV +2
    67
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5 SUVScorpion Verde
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 4 tests7175
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)54
    Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–198%100%

    ContiSportContact 5 SUV: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 69

    Scorpion Verde: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 54.3 = 67

    No owner ratings of noise for ContiSportContact 5 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 43

    Treadwear

    Scorpion Verde +14
    57
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5 SUVScorpion Verde
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 53 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online2851

    ContiSportContact 5 SUV: 60% × 52.7 (est.) + 40% × 27.5 = 43

    Scorpion Verde: 60% × 60.9 (est.) + 40% × 51.2 = 57

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiSportContact 5 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Scorpion Verde. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 58

    Handling (owners)

    Scorpion Verde +1
    59
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5 SUVScorpion Verde
    Reviews found online5859
  8. 73

    Efficiency

    Level
    73
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5 SUVScorpion Verde
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 4 tests7373
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–098%98%
Scores at a glance
Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV vs Pirelli Scorpion Verde: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiSportContact 5 SUVPirelli Scorpion Verde
Relative Score 63 63
Dry 69 64
Wet 70 67
Snow – 64
Comfort 53 56
Noise 69 67
Treadwear 43 57
Handling (owners) 58 59
Efficiency 73 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

ContiSportContact 5 SUV

± 7

Scorpion Verde

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 4 tests that ran both, Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV finished ahead 4 times and Pirelli Scorpion Verde 0 times.

DisciplineCategoryContiSportContact 5 SUVScorpion VerdeΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 100% 94% +5.7 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test · 265/60 R18
Dry Handling Dry 100% 98% +2.1 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test · 265/60 R18
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 96% 96% −0.3 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test · 265/60 R18
Wet Braking Wet 99% 100% −0.8 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test · 265/60 R18
Wet Handling Wet 100% 94% +5.9 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test · 265/60 R18
Noise Noise 98% 100% −1.8 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test · 265/60 R18
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 98% 98% +0.6 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test · 265/60 R18
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 51% 59% −7.1 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test · 265/60 R18
Grass Traction Off-road 89% 87% +2.5 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test · 265/60 R18
Gravel Handling Off-road 100% 100% 0.0 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test · 265/60 R18
Gravel Traction Off-road 96% 98% −1.6 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test · 265/60 R18
Mud Traction Off-road 82% 88% −5.7 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test · 265/60 R18
Overall Ranking Overall #1/8 #4/8 – 4–0 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test · 265/60 R18

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiSportContact 5 SUV

Pros

  • Impressive wet and dry grip with responsive handling
  • Exceptional braking performance in various conditions
  • Quiet operation and smooth, comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear, with many users needing replacements under 15,000 miles
  • High price point relative to the mileage longevity received
  • Some complaints regarding road noise as the tires age
All owner themes in the ContiSportContact 5 SUV review

Tire B Scorpion Verde

Pros

  • Low road noise and enhanced ride comfort
  • Good fuel economy and low rolling resistance
  • Reliable handling and stability in dry and wet conditions

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear reported by several drivers
  • Poor aquaplaning resistance and reduced traction in heavy rain or standing water
  • Prone to developing noticeable road roar or vibration as they age
All owner themes in the Scorpion Verde review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Pirelli Scorpion Verde

Mixed

Community sentiment regarding the Pirelli Scorpion Verde is polarized across different performance categories. While drivers frequently praise its quiet ride, responsive dry handling, and solid wet traction, many report poor snow and winter performance, alongside notable complaints of premature tread wear, cracking, and chunking.

Top themes
#Winter and snow performance#Tread wear and longevity#Road noise and comfort#Wet traction and hydroplaning#Cracking and rubber degradation#OEM fitment comparisons

Based on 73 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV B · Pirelli Scorpion Verde
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available—66
Rim diameters—16″ – 22″
Tread depth—8/32″
UTQG—400 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV

Pirelli Scorpion Verde

Too close to call: Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV and Pirelli Scorpion Verde are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV is stronger on dry and wet. Pirelli Scorpion Verde is stronger on treadwear and comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Pirelli Scorpion Verde scores 57 vs 43 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV scores 69 vs 64 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV scores 70 vs 67 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Pirelli Scorpion Verde scores 56 vs 53 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV
Tire B · Pirelli Scorpion Verde

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiSportContact 5 SUV or Scorpion Verde?

Which is better in the wet, ContiSportContact 5 SUV or Scorpion Verde?

Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV, 70 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSportContact 5 SUV or Scorpion Verde?

Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV, 69 vs 64 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, ContiSportContact 5 SUV or Scorpion Verde?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 67 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, ContiSportContact 5 SUV or Scorpion Verde?

Pirelli Scorpion Verde, 56 vs 53 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiSportContact 5 SUV or Scorpion Verde?

Pirelli Scorpion Verde, 57 vs 43 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, ContiSportContact 5 SUV or Scorpion Verde?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 73 on the efficiency score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology