tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiSportContact 5 vs Hankook Ventus Evo — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 10 road tests and 27 + 51 owner reviews. How we score

Ventus Evo is ahead, 84–66

Check price on Amazon · Ventus Evo or ContiSportContact 5 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Ventus Evo
Tire BHankook

Ventus Evo

Summer

± 4

Tests 86 · 10 tests Owners 78 · 51 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 50 in 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? (dry braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    Ventus Evo +22
    89
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Ventus Evo
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests≈ 67 (est.)93
    Reviews found online6682

    ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 66.1 = 67

    Ventus Evo: 60% × 93.3 + 40% × 81.6 = 89

    No road tests of dry for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 71

    Wet

    Ventus Evo +20
    91
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Ventus Evo
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests≈ 71 (est.)96
    Reviews found online7184

    ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 71

    Ventus Evo: 60% × 95.8 + 40% × 84.1 = 91

    No road tests of wet for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 68

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Ventus Evo
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)–
    Reviews found online66–

    ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 68

    No road tests of snow for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 63

    Comfort

    Ventus Evo +12
    75
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Ventus Evo
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 67 (est.)81
    Reviews found online6171

    ContiSportContact 5: 40% × 67.2 (est.) + 60% × 60.9 = 63

    Ventus Evo: 40% × 80.8 + 60% × 71 = 75

    No road tests of comfort for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 69

    Noise

    ContiSportContact 5 +4
    65
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Ventus Evo
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests≈ 66 (est.)64
    Reviews found online74≈ 66 (est.)

    ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.2 = 69

    Ventus Evo: 60% × 64.4 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 65

    No road tests of noise for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for Ventus Evo. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 56

    Treadwear

    Ventus Evo +19
    75
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Ventus Evo
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 61 (est.)78
    Reviews found online5070

    ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 50 = 56

    Ventus Evo: 60% × 78 + 40% × 69.6 = 75

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    81
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Ventus Evo
    Reviews found online–81
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    56
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Ventus Evo
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests–56
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ContiSportContact 5Hankook Ventus Evo
Relative Score 66 84
Dry 67 89
Wet 71 91
Snow 68 –
Comfort 63 75
Noise 69 65
Treadwear 56 75
Handling (owners) – 81
Efficiency – 56

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ContiSportContact 5

± 4

Ventus Evo

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiSportContact 5

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Ventus Evo

Pros

  • Exceptional grip in both dry and wet conditions
  • High value for money compared to premium competitors
  • Quiet operation and improved ride comfort over various OEM tires

Cons

  • Reduced steering feel and road feedback due to softer sidewalls
  • Occasional reports of a humming noise at specific highway speeds
  • Faster than expected tread wear on heavier performance or EV applications
All owner themes in the Ventus Evo review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiSportContact 5 B · Hankook Ventus Evo
CategorySummer tireSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Sizes available86106
Rim diameters17″ – 22″17″ – 22″
Tread depth8 - 10/32″—
UTQG280 - 420 A - AA A180 - 380 A - AA A
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—
Sizes in common3434

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiSportContact 5

Hankook Ventus Evo

Winner: Hankook Ventus Evo — better dry, wet and treadwear. Pick the Continental ContiSportContact 5 if noise matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Ventus Evo scores 89 vs 67 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Ventus Evo scores 91 vs 71 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Ventus Evo scores 75 vs 56 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Ventus Evo scores 75 vs 63 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental ContiSportContact 5
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Ventus Evo
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiSportContact 5 or Ventus Evo?

Which is better in the wet, ContiSportContact 5 or Ventus Evo?

Hankook Ventus Evo, 91 vs 71 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSportContact 5 or Ventus Evo?

Hankook Ventus Evo, 89 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, ContiSportContact 5 or Ventus Evo?

Continental ContiSportContact 5, 69 vs 65 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiSportContact 5 or Ventus Evo?

Hankook Ventus Evo, 75 vs 63 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiSportContact 5 or Ventus Evo?

Hankook Ventus Evo, 75 vs 56 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology