Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 27 reviews
Continental ContiSportContact 5 vs Pirelli Scorpion Verde — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 27 + 1,302 owner reviews. How we score
ContiSportContact 5 leads, 67–63 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 68 · 4 tests Owners 57 · 1,302 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test (wet braking)
“My mom's mercedes GLC300 came with pirelli scorpion Verde tires and they have 1/32" measured left on the wear bars after less than 30k miles. My mother drives like a grandma too. They're fine for turns and pep on Florida roads but absurdly short wear time.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
ContiSportContact 5 +364Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 Scorpion Verde Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 69 Reviews found online 67 56 ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.9 = 67
Scorpion Verde: 60% × 68.7 + 40% × 56.3 = 64
No road tests of dry for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
72
Wet
ContiSportContact 5 +567Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 Scorpion Verde Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 72 61 ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 72
Scorpion Verde: 60% × 70.3 + 40% × 61.1 = 67
No road tests of wet for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
69
Snow
ContiSportContact 5 +564Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 Scorpion Verde Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 68 61 ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.5 = 69
Scorpion Verde: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 64
No road tests of snow for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Scorpion Verde. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
64
Comfort
ContiSportContact 5 +856Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 Scorpion Verde Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 53 Reviews found online 62 59 ContiSportContact 5: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 62.1 = 64
Scorpion Verde: 40% × 52.5 + 60% × 58.6 = 56
No road tests of comfort for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Noise
ContiSportContact 5 +367Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 Scorpion Verde Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 75 54 ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 75 = 70
Scorpion Verde: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 54.2 = 67
No road tests of noise for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
56
Treadwear
Scorpion Verde +157Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 Scorpion Verde Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 50 51 ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 60.5 (est.) + 40% × 50 = 56
Scorpion Verde: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 51.1 = 57
No road tests of treadwear for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Scorpion Verde. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison59Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 Scorpion Verde Reviews found online – 59 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison73Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 Scorpion Verde Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests – 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSportContact 5 | Pirelli Scorpion Verde |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 63 |
| Dry | 67 | 64 |
| Wet | 72 | 67 |
| Snow | 69 | 64 |
| Comfort | 64 | 56 |
| Noise | 70 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 56 | 57 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 59 |
| Efficiency | – | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ContiSportContact 5
Scorpion Verde
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiSportContact 5
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Scorpion Verde
Pros
- Low road noise and enhanced ride comfort
- Good fuel economy and low rolling resistance
- Reliable handling and stability in dry and wet conditions
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear reported by several drivers
- Poor aquaplaning resistance and reduced traction in heavy rain or standing water
- Prone to developing noticeable road roar or vibration as they age
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental ContiSportContact 5
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Pirelli Scorpion Verde
Community sentiment regarding the Pirelli Scorpion Verde is polarized across different performance categories. While drivers frequently praise its quiet ride, responsive dry handling, and solid wet traction, many report poor snow and winter performance, alongside notable complaints of premature tread wear, cracking, and chunking.
“I have the 20” Perelli Scorpion Verde all season on my 2024 Macan S and am very happy with them. Very good handling , traction, and reasonably quiet. When they need to be replaced, I will likely stay with the same. They are only rated to 150 mph, so you do have to watch yourself on the on ramps :)”
“Time to start considering my next set of tires Bought my used 2010 Lexus RX450h a few years ago, and the tread is starting to get shallow, after putting about 30k on the Pirelli Scorpion Verde All-Season tires that came with the vehicle (vehicle is at 116k total). I've been very happy with the performance I've received on the Pirelli tires; especially in heavy rains. The one thing I haven't really done is take them to the snow. But, with that said, I've been looking at other brands. The Bridgestone Blizzak and UltraWeather tires carry 80k mile warrantees, and are less expensive. Plus, the latter has the 3PMSF rating along with the M+S, so it's actually rated for snowy conditions. There's also the Michelin CrossClimate 2 to consider. Am I giving up performance in rainy conditions by going with the higher snow rated tire? The Pirelli tires are about $30ish more per tire. In the scheme of things is $100-120 per set in the scheme of things? What other brands/models are people using that gives them really good performance in rain, with some trips to the snow/ice country? FWIW: My tire size is the bigger 235/55R19 that came as an option on the vehicle Read more”
“Quote: Originally Posted by arthurmnev Agreed. On top of that, I'd challenge any dealer on .2 inch variance screwing up electronics with a variance of air expanding and contracting due to heat.. A quick update on this. 275/40 r20 on 2013 a8l are too close to the steering arms. The gap with 265/40 20 is 10mm , a wider tire will shrink this clearance to 6mm. I ended up RMAing these in favor of 35 aspect ratio. These fit perfectly”
Based on 73 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSportContact 5 | B · Pirelli Scorpion Verde |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 86 | 66 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 22″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 8 - 10/32″ | 8/32″ |
| UTQG | 280 - 420 A - AA A | 400 A A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 32 | 32 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiSportContact 5
Pirelli Scorpion Verde
Narrow edge: Continental ContiSportContact 5 — better comfort, wet and snow. Where the Pirelli Scorpion Verde is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Continental ContiSportContact 5 scores 64 vs 56 on comfort.
Continental ContiSportContact 5 scores 72 vs 67 on wet.
Continental ContiSportContact 5 scores 69 vs 64 on snow.
Continental ContiSportContact 5 scores 67 vs 64 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiSportContact 5 or Scorpion Verde?
Which is better in the wet, ContiSportContact 5 or Scorpion Verde?
Continental ContiSportContact 5, 72 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSportContact 5 or Scorpion Verde?
Continental ContiSportContact 5, 67 vs 64 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ContiSportContact 5 or Scorpion Verde?
Continental ContiSportContact 5, 69 vs 64 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, ContiSportContact 5 or Scorpion Verde?
Continental ContiSportContact 5, 70 vs 67 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiSportContact 5 or Scorpion Verde?
Continental ContiSportContact 5, 64 vs 56 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiSportContact 5 or Scorpion Verde?
Neither, by our numbers: 56 vs 57 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology