tirewheelguide

Toyo Proxes RA1 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiSportContact 5 vs Toyo Proxes RA1 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 27 + 11 owner reviews. How we score

Proxes RA1 leads, 66–63 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Proxes RA1 or ContiSportContact 5 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Toyo Proxes RA1
Tire BToyo

Proxes RA1

Summer Trackday and Competition tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 11 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    Proxes RA1 +10
    75
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Proxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online6379

    ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 65

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 78.5 = 75

    No road tests of dry for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 67

    Wet

    ContiSportContact 5 +3
    64
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Proxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6761

    ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 67

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 64

    No road tests of wet for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 66

    Snow

    ContiSportContact 5 +17
    49
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Proxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online6334

    ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 63.3 = 66

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 34.4 = 49

    No road tests of snow for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 63

    Comfort

    Proxes RA1 +4
    67
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Proxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5766

    ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 56.8 = 63

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for ContiSportContact 5 or Proxes RA1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 68

    Noise

    Level
    68
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Proxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6970

    ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 68

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 68

    No road tests of noise for ContiSportContact 5 or Proxes RA1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 53

    Treadwear

    Proxes RA1 +14
    67
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Proxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online4568

    ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 59.2 (est.) + 40% × 44.6 = 53

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 53

    Handling (owners)

    Proxes RA1 +20
    73
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Proxes RA1
    Reviews found online5373
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ContiSportContact 5Toyo Proxes RA1
Relative Score 63 66
Dry 65 75
Wet 67 64
Snow 66 49
Comfort 63 67
Noise 68 68
Treadwear 53 67
Handling (owners) 53 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ContiSportContact 5

Proxes RA1

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiSportContact 5

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Proxes RA1

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip that remains consistent even as the tread wears down.
  • Superior tire life compared to many other dedicated track-focused compounds.
  • Predictable breakaway characteristics that provide driver confidence at the limit.

Cons

  • Performance can become 'greasy' if the tire is overdriven or overheated during long sessions.
  • Requires proper heat cycling and break-in procedures to achieve optimal performance.
  • Sensitive to alignment settings, which can lead to accelerated or uneven wear if not managed.
All owner themes in the Proxes RA1 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiSportContact 5 B · Toyo Proxes RA1
CategorySummer tireSummer Trackday and Competition tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available867
Rim diameters17″ – 22″15″ – 18″
Tread depth8 - 10/32″8/32″
UTQG280 - 420 A - AA A100 AA A
SidewallBlack Side WallBlack Side Wall
Max pressure50 - 51 psi44 psi
Sizes in common11

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiSportContact 5

Toyo Proxes RA1

Narrow edge: Toyo Proxes RA1 — better handling, treadwear and dry. Pick the Continental ContiSportContact 5 if snow and wet matter most to you. Toyo Proxes RA1 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Toyo Proxes RA1 scores 73 vs 53 on handling.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Continental ContiSportContact 5 scores 66 vs 49 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Toyo Proxes RA1 scores 67 vs 53 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Toyo Proxes RA1 scores 75 vs 65 on dry.

Tire A · Continental ContiSportContact 5
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Toyo Proxes RA1
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiSportContact 5 or Proxes RA1?

Which is better in the wet, ContiSportContact 5 or Proxes RA1?

Continental ContiSportContact 5, 67 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSportContact 5 or Proxes RA1?

Toyo Proxes RA1, 75 vs 65 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ContiSportContact 5 or Proxes RA1?

Continental ContiSportContact 5, 66 vs 49 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, ContiSportContact 5 or Proxes RA1?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 68 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, ContiSportContact 5 or Proxes RA1?

Toyo Proxes RA1, 67 vs 63 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiSportContact 5 or Proxes RA1?

Toyo Proxes RA1, 67 vs 53 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology