Toyo Proxes RA1 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Crugen HP71 vs Toyo Proxes RA1 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 278 + 11 owner reviews. How we score

Proxes RA1 is ahead, 64–47

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Crugen HP71
Tire AKumho

Crugen HP71

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 34 · 278 reviews

“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”

Toyo Proxes RA1
Tire BToyo

Proxes RA1

Summer Trackday and Competition tires

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 11 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 44

    Dry

    Proxes RA1 +29
    73
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Proxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 53 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online3175

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 52.5 (est.) + 40% × 30.6 = 44

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 75.1 = 73

    No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 51

    Wet

    Proxes RA1 +11
    62
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Proxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 56 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online4458

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 56 (est.) + 40% × 43.9 = 51

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 58.1 = 62

    No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 53

    Snow

    Crugen HP71 +4
    49
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Proxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online4134

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 40.8 = 53

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 58.8 (est.) + 40% × 33.7 = 49

    No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 44

    Comfort

    Proxes RA1 +21
    65
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Proxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online3263

    Crugen HP71: 40% × 61.2 (est.) + 60% × 32.1 = 44

    Proxes RA1: 40% × 67.7 (est.) + 60% × 63.4 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 54

    Noise

    Proxes RA1 +14
    68
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Proxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online3670

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 35.5 = 54

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.7 = 68

    No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71 or Proxes RA1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 37

    Treadwear

    Proxes RA1 +28
    65
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Proxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 49 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online1964

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 49.4 (est.) + 40% × 18.5 = 37

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 51

    Handling (owners)

    Proxes RA1 +17
    68
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Proxes RA1
    Reviews found online5168
Scores at a glance
Kumho Crugen HP71 vs Toyo Proxes RA1: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Crugen HP71Toyo Proxes RA1
Relative Score 47 64
Dry 44 73
Wet 51 62
Snow 53 49
Comfort 44 65
Noise 54 68
Treadwear 37 65
Handling (owners) 51 68

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Crugen HP71

± 8

Proxes RA1

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Crugen HP71

Pros

  • Strong value: frequently described as much cheaper than Michelin, Pirelli or Bridgestone alternatives while not feeling like a budget tire.
  • Good wet and heavy-rain traction, with some reports of confident light-snow performance.
  • Quiet, smooth ride reported by many owners, often as an improvement over the stock tires (Bridgestone Dueler, Pirelli, Hankook).

Cons

  • Premature or uneven tread wear is the most common complaint, with reports of tires worn out at roughly 15,000 to 27,000 miles or within 1.5 years, far below the 65,000-mile rating.
  • Road and highway noise, including howling that develops with mileage, reported by several owners.
  • Vibration and difficulty keeping the tires balanced, in some cases even after repeated balancing and rotations.
All owner themes in the Crugen HP71 review

Tire B Proxes RA1

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip that remains consistent even as the tread wears down.
  • Superior tire life compared to many other dedicated track-focused compounds.
  • Predictable breakaway characteristics that provide driver confidence at the limit.

Cons

  • Performance can become 'greasy' if the tire is overdriven or overheated during long sessions.
  • Requires proper heat cycling and break-in procedures to achieve optimal performance.
  • Sensitive to alignment settings, which can lead to accelerated or uneven wear if not managed.
All owner themes in the Proxes RA1 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Crugen HP71

Mixed

Community opinions on the Kumho Crugen HP71 (including EV variants) are generally mixed, primarily leaning on price and initial comfort versus longevity. Many users appreciate the affordable pricing, quiet/smooth ride, and good handling, but a significant number report faster-than-expected tread wear and occasional issues with foam lining separation or durability on heavier vehicles.

r/VolvoRecharge ·1 upvote ·2026-10-05

“Kumho Crugen HP71 235/50R19XL 103V BSW ($132.44/each) Total: $264.88 Kumho Crugen EV HP71 255/45R19XL 104V BSW ($287.70/each Gigatires about a month ago I feel like they're just as good as the Continentals that came with the car It's crazy that these EVS have different size tires front and rear, prevents rotating tires for even wear. It's also surprising that the cost difference from the front the rear was so much different. It was also like that with numerous other manufacturers. I also drive about 24,000 mi a year, so we'll see if they hold up.”

r/AskAMechanic ·1 upvote ·2026-07-26

“I need a new tire, right? 215/55R18 Kumho Crugen HP71 tire showing cords on the outer sidewall. I need a new tire, right? Edit: I’m thinking about replacing just this one tire, 2023 CX-30 AWD. Tires were new Oct 2025 and have 7mm tread depth left. According to the spec sheet, this new tire would have 7.9mm of depth. Can I get away with one tire? Edit 2: Existing vs new tires would have ~1mm of difference in tread depth Read more”

r/CadillacLyriq ·4 upvotes ·2026-09-20

“How many miles do you guys get on tires? I had a blowout back in June, and decided to just buy a full set. The shop had a promo on these KumHo Crugen HP71 tires, which had a 65,000 mile warranty. 3 months and 12,000 miles later, my tread is completely gone. I got some Michelins and was credited 185 bucks per tire, but this seems insanely low mileage to wear out the tread completely. I know the added weight and torque of an EV somewhat lowers the lifespan of tires, but even if I was driving like a demon, I don't think 12,000 miles should be anywhere near the lifespan of a reputable brand.”

Top themes
#Affordability and Value#Ride Comfort and Noise#Tread Wear and Longevity#EV Performance and Efficiency#Durability and Quality Issues

Based on 52 community posts

Tire B

Toyo Proxes RA1

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Crugen HP71 B · Toyo Proxes RA1
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresSummer Trackday and Competition tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available637
Rim diameters16″ – 22″15″ – 18″
Tread depth9.9/32″8/32″
UTQG640 A A100 AA A
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwallBlack Side Wall
Max pressure51 psi44 psi
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Crugen HP71

Toyo Proxes RA1

Winner: Toyo Proxes RA1 — better dry, treadwear and comfort. Pick the Kumho Crugen HP71 if snow matters most to you. Toyo Proxes RA1 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Toyo Proxes RA1 scores 73 vs 44 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Toyo Proxes RA1 scores 65 vs 37 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Toyo Proxes RA1 scores 65 vs 44 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Toyo Proxes RA1 scores 68 vs 51 on handling.

Tire A · Kumho Crugen HP71
Tire B · Toyo Proxes RA1

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Crugen HP71 or Proxes RA1?

Which is better in the wet, Crugen HP71 or Proxes RA1?

Toyo Proxes RA1, 62 vs 51 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HP71 or Proxes RA1?

Toyo Proxes RA1, 73 vs 44 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Crugen HP71 or Proxes RA1?

Kumho Crugen HP71, 53 vs 49 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Crugen HP71 or Proxes RA1?

Toyo Proxes RA1, 68 vs 54 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Crugen HP71 or Proxes RA1?

Toyo Proxes RA1, 65 vs 44 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Crugen HP71 or Proxes RA1?

Toyo Proxes RA1, 65 vs 37 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology