Tests – · none yet Owners 34 · 278 reviews
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
Toyo Proxes RA1 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 278 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
Proxes RA1 is ahead, 64–47
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 34 · 278 reviews
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 11 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 53 (est.) | ≈ 71 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 31 | 75 |
Crugen HP71: 60% × 52.5 (est.) + 40% × 30.6 = 44
Proxes RA1: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 75.1 = 73
No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 56 (est.) | ≈ 64 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 44 | 58 |
Crugen HP71: 60% × 56 (est.) + 40% × 43.9 = 51
Proxes RA1: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 58.1 = 62
No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 61 (est.) | ≈ 59 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 41 | 34 |
Crugen HP71: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 40.8 = 53
Proxes RA1: 60% × 58.8 (est.) + 40% × 33.7 = 49
No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 61 (est.) | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 32 | 63 |
Crugen HP71: 40% × 61.2 (est.) + 60% × 32.1 = 44
Proxes RA1: 40% × 67.7 (est.) + 60% × 63.4 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 36 | 70 |
Crugen HP71: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 35.5 = 54
Proxes RA1: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.7 = 68
No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71 or Proxes RA1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 49 (est.) | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 19 | 64 |
Crugen HP71: 60% × 49.4 (est.) + 40% × 18.5 = 37
Proxes RA1: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 51 | 68 |
| Category | Kumho Crugen HP71 | Toyo Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 47 | 64 |
| Dry | 44 | 73 |
| Wet | 51 | 62 |
| Snow | 53 | 49 |
| Comfort | 44 | 65 |
| Noise | 54 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 37 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 51 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Crugen HP71
Proxes RA1
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community opinions on the Kumho Crugen HP71 (including EV variants) are generally mixed, primarily leaning on price and initial comfort versus longevity. Many users appreciate the affordable pricing, quiet/smooth ride, and good handling, but a significant number report faster-than-expected tread wear and occasional issues with foam lining separation or durability on heavier vehicles.
“Kumho Crugen HP71 235/50R19XL 103V BSW ($132.44/each) Total: $264.88 Kumho Crugen EV HP71 255/45R19XL 104V BSW ($287.70/each Gigatires about a month ago I feel like they're just as good as the Continentals that came with the car It's crazy that these EVS have different size tires front and rear, prevents rotating tires for even wear. It's also surprising that the cost difference from the front the rear was so much different. It was also like that with numerous other manufacturers. I also drive about 24,000 mi a year, so we'll see if they hold up.”
“I need a new tire, right? 215/55R18 Kumho Crugen HP71 tire showing cords on the outer sidewall. I need a new tire, right? Edit: I’m thinking about replacing just this one tire, 2023 CX-30 AWD. Tires were new Oct 2025 and have 7mm tread depth left. According to the spec sheet, this new tire would have 7.9mm of depth. Can I get away with one tire? Edit 2: Existing vs new tires would have ~1mm of difference in tread depth Read more”
“How many miles do you guys get on tires? I had a blowout back in June, and decided to just buy a full set. The shop had a promo on these KumHo Crugen HP71 tires, which had a 65,000 mile warranty. 3 months and 12,000 miles later, my tread is completely gone. I got some Michelins and was credited 185 bucks per tire, but this seems insanely low mileage to wear out the tread completely. I know the added weight and torque of an EV somewhat lowers the lifespan of tires, but even if I was driving like a demon, I don't think 12,000 miles should be anywhere near the lifespan of a reputable brand.”
Based on 52 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Kumho Crugen HP71 | B · Toyo Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Trackday and Competition tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 63 | 7 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 9.9/32″ | 8/32″ |
| UTQG | 640 A A | 100 AA A |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 44 psi |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Kumho Crugen HP71
Toyo Proxes RA1
Winner: Toyo Proxes RA1 — better dry, treadwear and comfort. Pick the Kumho Crugen HP71 if snow matters most to you. Toyo Proxes RA1 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Toyo Proxes RA1 scores 73 vs 44 on dry.
Toyo Proxes RA1 scores 65 vs 37 on treadwear.
Toyo Proxes RA1 scores 65 vs 44 on comfort.
Toyo Proxes RA1 scores 68 vs 51 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Toyo Proxes RA1, 62 vs 51 on our wet score.
Toyo Proxes RA1, 73 vs 44 on our dry score.
Kumho Crugen HP71, 53 vs 49 on our snow score.
Toyo Proxes RA1, 68 vs 54 on our noise score.
Toyo Proxes RA1, 65 vs 44 on our comfort score.
Toyo Proxes RA1, 65 vs 37 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology