tirewheelguide

Toyo Proxes RA1 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV vs Toyo Proxes RA1 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 9 + 0 road tests and 1,371 + 11 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport 4 SUV is ahead, 79–69

Check price on Amazon · Pilot Sport 4 SUV or Proxes RA1 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Tire AMichelin

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Summer

Tests 79 · 9 tests Owners 75 · 1,371 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 12 in 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested (wet braking)

“Loving my new Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tires and Enkei Raijin wheels”

Toyo Proxes RA1
Tire BToyo

Proxes RA1

Summer Trackday and Competition tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 11 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 84

    Dry

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV +9
    75
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SUVProxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests85≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online8179

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 85.4 + 40% × 81.1 = 84

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 78.5 = 75

    No road tests of dry for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 88

    Wet

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV +24
    64
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SUVProxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests92≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online8161

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 92.3 + 40% × 81.1 = 88

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 64

    No road tests of wet for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    49
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SUVProxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online–34

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 34.4 = 49

    No road tests of snow for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 60

    Comfort

    Proxes RA1 +7
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SUVProxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests54≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7066

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 54.2 + 40% × 69.8 = 60

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for Proxes RA1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 61

    Noise

    Proxes RA1 +7
    68
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SUVProxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests53≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7470

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 52.5 + 40% × 74.2 = 61

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 68

    No road tests of noise for Proxes RA1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 71

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV +4
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SUVProxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests76≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6568

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 75.5 + 40% × 64.8 = 71

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 78

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV +5
    73
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SUVProxes RA1
    Reviews found online7873
Scores at a glance
CategoryMichelin Pilot Sport 4 SUVToyo Proxes RA1
Relative Score 79 69
Dry 84 75
Wet 88 64
Snow – 49
Comfort 60 67
Noise 61 68
Treadwear 71 67
Handling (owners) 78 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Proxes RA1

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Pros

  • Outstanding grip and safety in both wet and dry conditions
  • Precise steering response and enhanced cornering stability for heavy SUVs
  • Noticeable improvement in ride comfort and overall handling

Cons

  • Higher-than-average purchase price
  • Increased road noise reported by some users as the tread wears down
  • Faster tread wear and shorter mileage lifespan under aggressive driving or heavy vehicle loads
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport 4 SUV review

Tire B Proxes RA1

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip that remains consistent even as the tread wears down.
  • Superior tire life compared to many other dedicated track-focused compounds.
  • Predictable breakaway characteristics that provide driver confidence at the limit.

Cons

  • Performance can become 'greasy' if the tire is overdriven or overheated during long sessions.
  • Requires proper heat cycling and break-in procedures to achieve optimal performance.
  • Sensitive to alignment settings, which can lead to accelerated or uneven wear if not managed.
All owner themes in the Proxes RA1 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV is generally very positive, with owners highlighting its strong grip, handling precision, and suitability for heavy performance SUVs. Users frequently compare it favorably to older Latitude Sport 3 and standard passenger tires, though they emphasize its summer-only limitation below 40°F and note trade-offs in price and tread life.

r/CX5 ·103 upvotes ·2021-05-15

“Loving my new Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tires and Enkei Raijin wheels”
bobistheoilguy.com ·2022-04-22

“Figured I would update this thread. Ended up buying a set of four brand new 18" Saab 9-7X wheels that were shipped over, and went with Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tires in 255/55R18 109Y XL flavor. This is the first set of French made Michelins I've purchased, and they all were manufactured in December 2021. Also got some chrome McGard spline drive lug nuts. The ride is definitely firmer than it was compared to the 255/60R17 106V tires on there previously, but that's a good thing in my book. Only put 18 miles on them so far, so I can't say all that much. However, I definitely like them so far.”
rennlist.com

“Have a 2014 CTTS with 21" wheels. Just had Michelin PilotSport4 SUV All-season put on. Before that had Michelin PilotSport4S. Have about 1K miles on the new tires, and no experience with it in winter weather yet, but prefer the ride quality over the PS4S. The PS4SUV are a softer ride, yet still have plenty of grip when I hit the "Sport" button. IMO, the PS4S is overkill for the Cayenne. Obviously, subjective and YMMV. Does your wife engage in "spirited" driving? As background, I have PS4S tires on my 2016 Spyder and love them.”
Top themes
#Summer temperature limitations#Grip and handling performance#Tread life and wear#Comparison with Latitude Sport 3#Ride comfort and firmness#SUV-specific load design

Based on 37 community posts

Tire B

Toyo Proxes RA1

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV B · Toyo Proxes RA1
CategorySummerSummer Trackday and Competition tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available657
Rim diameters17″ – 23″15″ – 18″
Tread depth—8/32″
UTQG—100 AA A
Sidewall—Black Side Wall
Max pressure—44 psi
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Toyo Proxes RA1

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV — better wet, dry and treadwear. Pick the Toyo Proxes RA1 if comfort and noise matter most to you. Toyo Proxes RA1 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 88 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 84 vs 75 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Toyo Proxes RA1 scores 67 vs 60 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Toyo Proxes RA1 scores 68 vs 61 on noise.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Toyo Proxes RA1
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pilot Sport 4 SUV or Proxes RA1?

Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport 4 SUV or Proxes RA1?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 88 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport 4 SUV or Proxes RA1?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 84 vs 75 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Pilot Sport 4 SUV or Proxes RA1?

Toyo Proxes RA1, 68 vs 61 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport 4 SUV or Proxes RA1?

Toyo Proxes RA1, 67 vs 60 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport 4 SUV or Proxes RA1?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 71 vs 67 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology