Tests – · none yet Owners 43 · 9 reviews
Continental ContiVanContact 200 vs Hankook Vantra LT — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 9 + 321 owner reviews. How we score
ContiVanContact 200 leads, 53–51 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
56
Dry
ContiVanContact 200 +353Why this score
Source ContiVanContact 200 Vantra LT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 49 45 ContiVanContact 200: 60% × 60.1 (est.) + 40% × 49.1 = 56
Vantra LT: 60% × 58.3 (est.) + 40% × 44.9 = 53
No road tests of dry for ContiVanContact 200. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Vantra LT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
57
Wet
ContiVanContact 200 +651Why this score
Source ContiVanContact 200 Vantra LT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 56 (est.) Reviews found online 52 44 ContiVanContact 200: 60% × 60.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.5 = 57
Vantra LT: 60% × 55.7 (est.) + 40% × 43.6 = 51
No road tests of wet for ContiVanContact 200. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Vantra LT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
54
Comfort
ContiVanContact 200 +549Why this score
Source ContiVanContact 200 Vantra LT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 47 40 ContiVanContact 200: 40% × 65.1 (est.) + 60% × 47.4 = 54
Vantra LT: 40% × 63.7 (est.) + 60% × 39.7 = 49
No road tests of comfort for ContiVanContact 200 or Vantra LT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
41
Treadwear
Vantra LT +1152Why this score
Source ContiVanContact 200 Vantra LT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 52 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 25 43 ContiVanContact 200: 60% × 51.7 (est.) + 40% × 24.6 = 41
Vantra LT: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 43.2 = 52
No road tests of treadwear for ContiVanContact 200. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Vantra LT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
53
Handling (owners)
ContiVanContact 200 +845Why this score
Source ContiVanContact 200 Vantra LT Reviews found online 53 45
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiVanContact 200 | Hankook Vantra LT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 53 | 51 |
| Dry | 56 | 53 |
| Wet | 57 | 51 |
| Comfort | 54 | 49 |
| Treadwear | 41 | 52 |
| Handling (owners) | 53 | 45 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiVanContact 200
Vantra LT
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Continental ContiVanContact 200 finished ahead 1 times and Hankook Vantra LT 0 times.
| Discipline | Category | ContiVanContact 200 | Vantra LT | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #5/16 | #15/16 | – | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 ADAC Van 215/65 R16 C Tyre Test · 215/65 R16 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiVanContact 200
Pros
- Strong initial grip and handling performance in both wet and dry conditions
- Comfortable ride quality
- Acceptable fuel efficiency
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear
- Significant loss of wet-weather traction as the tread depth decreases
- Pronounced uneven wear patterns, specifically scalloping and outer-edge degradation
Tire B Vantra LT
Pros
- Low road noise and quiet operation
- Comfortable ride quality and smooth handling
- Good overall grip in both dry and wet conditions
Cons
- Subpar wet-weather performance and traction for some drivers
- Premature wear or cracking reported by a few users
- Occasional reports of a stiffer or harder ride depending on vehicle load
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental ContiVanContact 200
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Hankook Vantra LT
Community sentiment toward the Hankook Vantra LT is largely positive, with users frequently selecting them for vans, motorhomes, buses, and trailers. Owners highlight low road noise and quiet operation, often choosing them as replacements for Michelin and Continental tires or citing favorable test results.
“Quote: Originally Posted by achenator I went through this back in the spring. I wound up with a kuhmo LT tire i think. I'll go look at storage tomorrow and see. I did a good bit of research and determined an LT tire was best. Take that back it was a Hankook VANTRA LT”
“Yes, we have had them on our 3.5 van conversion for the last few years. Vantra LT. Nice and quite with very low road noise will fit them again when needed.”
“Apollo , is/was Vredestijn Werd geleverd door Profile tyre center En Hankook vantra LT , Ze zijn ooit ook al eens als beste getest ,”
Based on 6 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiVanContact 200 | B · Hankook Vantra LT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Van | Van |
| Sizes available | 16 | 25 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 17″ | 14″ – 16″ |
| Sizes in common | 11 | 11 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiVanContact 200
Hankook Vantra LT
Narrow edge: Continental ContiVanContact 200 — better handling, wet and comfort. Pick the Hankook Vantra LT if treadwear matters most to you. Continental ContiVanContact 200 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Hankook Vantra LT scores 52 vs 41 on treadwear.
Continental ContiVanContact 200 scores 53 vs 45 on handling.
Continental ContiVanContact 200 scores 57 vs 51 on wet.
Continental ContiVanContact 200 scores 54 vs 49 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiVanContact 200 or Vantra LT?
Which is better in the wet, ContiVanContact 200 or Vantra LT?
Continental ContiVanContact 200, 57 vs 51 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiVanContact 200 or Vantra LT?
Continental ContiVanContact 200, 56 vs 53 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiVanContact 200 or Vantra LT?
Continental ContiVanContact 200, 54 vs 49 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiVanContact 200 or Vantra LT?
Hankook Vantra LT, 52 vs 41 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology