tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Dynapro AT2 vs Continental ContiVanContact 200 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 218 + 9 owner reviews. How we score

Dynapro AT2 leads, 56–53 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Dynapro AT2 or ContiVanContact 200 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Dynapro AT2
Tire AHankook

Dynapro AT2

All-Terrain tire

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 218 reviews

“New shoes for the Sunset Truck Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extremes in 30x9.5. Read more”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 56

    Dry

    Dynapro AT2 +1
    55
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AT2ContiVanContact 200
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online5049

    Dynapro AT2: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 50.2 = 56

    ContiVanContact 200: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 48.6 = 55

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for ContiVanContact 200. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 59

    Wet

    Dynapro AT2 +2
    57
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AT2ContiVanContact 200
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online5451

    Dynapro AT2: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 54 = 59

    ContiVanContact 200: 60% × 60.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.3 = 57

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for ContiVanContact 200. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 62

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AT2ContiVanContact 200
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online55–

    Dynapro AT2: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 55.3 = 62

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 52

    Comfort

    ContiVanContact 200 +2
    54
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AT2ContiVanContact 200
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online4547

    Dynapro AT2: 40% × 63.9 (est.) + 60% × 44.9 = 52

    ContiVanContact 200: 40% × 64.3 (est.) + 60% × 46.7 = 54

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for ContiVanContact 200. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 55

    Treadwear

    Dynapro AT2 +14
    41
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AT2ContiVanContact 200
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 52 (est.)
    Reviews found online4825

    Dynapro AT2: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.3 = 55

    ContiVanContact 200: 60% × 51.6 (est.) + 40% × 24.7 = 41

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiVanContact 200. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 47

    Handling (owners)

    ContiVanContact 200 +6
    53
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AT2ContiVanContact 200
    Reviews found online4753
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook Dynapro AT2Continental ContiVanContact 200
Relative Score 56 53
Dry 56 55
Wet 59 57
Snow 62 –
Comfort 52 54
Treadwear 55 41
Handling (owners) 47 53

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Dynapro AT2

± 8

ContiVanContact 200

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dynapro AT2

Pros

  • Comfortable ride quality on asphalt compared to standard summer or previous all-terrain models
  • Good traction and control in dry and wet weather conditions, including dependable trailer towing
  • Favorable fuel economy (MPGs) and low road noise for many users when new

Cons

  • Poor performance and lack of secure handling in snow, ice, and slush at highway speeds
  • Develops significant road noise or drumming as the tread wears down
  • Concerns regarding casing durability, including reports of premature cracking and vulnerability to gravel punctures
All owner themes in the Dynapro AT2 review

Tire B ContiVanContact 200

Pros

  • Strong initial grip and handling performance in both wet and dry conditions
  • Comfortable ride quality
  • Acceptable fuel efficiency

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear
  • Significant loss of wet-weather traction as the tread depth decreases
  • Pronounced uneven wear patterns, specifically scalloping and outer-edge degradation
All owner themes in the ContiVanContact 200 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Hankook Dynapro AT2

Mixed

Community sentiment for the Hankook Dynapro AT2 is divided, with frequent distinctions drawn between standard OEM versions and aftermarket or 'Xtreme' models. While drivers appreciate the tire's quiet highway ride, decent fuel economy, and competitive pricing, many criticize the base factory version for poor wet and winter traction as well as lack of genuine off-road capability. In contrast, the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme variant receives widespread praise for improved snow performance, durability, and aggressive styling.

r/TyreReviews ·1 upvote ·2023-03-21

“I just got the extreme at2 and they are awesome and quiet. Did go on an easy/moderate off-road in Broken Bow, OK and they did outstanding!”
f150forum.com

“I had the Hankook AT2 on my 2019 from the factory and they were way better than the Pirelli's that came on my '15 and my '22 F-150 FX4 trucks. They may not be a true AT tire, but they gave me 50,000 miles and functioned well in MN winters as on road tire and did well enough on the small number of off road excursions they took me on while hunting ( half mile to mile dirt trails and across various set-aside agricultural fields).”
r/f150 ·1 upvote ·2024-03-23

“I had the Dynapro AT2’s on my Lightning and they’re ok. I’d say they’re excellent dry, ok wet and in mud, marginal in snow. When I was looking for new tires I wanted an All Terrain that was slightly more aggressive for off-road and Three-Peak snow rated. But, with the Lightning, they couldn’t be a heavy tire as it would hurt range. Ended up settling on the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme. Essentially this is the newer version of the AT2. I’ve got about 10,000 miles on them so far and I’ll say dry handling is a little worse than the old AT2 (probably due to the more aggressive lugs), wet handling is about the same, but mud and snow handling is noticeably improved. So all in all, I probably wouldn’t get the AT2 again but I would do the AT2 Xtreme again.”
Top themes
#poor wet traction#quiet highway ride#OEM vs aftermarket differences#AT2 Xtreme praise#snow and ice performance#fuel efficiency and treadwear#mild off-road capability

Based on 47 community posts

Tire B

Continental ContiVanContact 200

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Dynapro AT2 B · Continental ContiVanContact 200
CategoryAll-Terrain tireSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Van
Sizes available3316
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 17″
UTQG440 - 660 A A - B—
Sizes in common33

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Dynapro AT2

Continental ContiVanContact 200

Narrow edge: Hankook Dynapro AT2 — better treadwear. Pick the Continental ContiVanContact 200 if handling matters most to you. Continental ContiVanContact 200 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook Dynapro AT2 scores 55 vs 41 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental ContiVanContact 200 scores 53 vs 47 on handling.

Tire A · Hankook Dynapro AT2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Continental ContiVanContact 200
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dynapro AT2 or ContiVanContact 200?

Which is better in the wet, Dynapro AT2 or ContiVanContact 200?

Neither, by our numbers: 59 vs 57 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro AT2 or ContiVanContact 200?

Neither, by our numbers: 56 vs 55 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Dynapro AT2 or ContiVanContact 200?

Neither, by our numbers: 52 vs 54 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Dynapro AT2 or ContiVanContact 200?

Hankook Dynapro AT2, 55 vs 41 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology