Tests – · none yet Owners 43 · 9 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental ContiVanContact 200 vs Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 9 + 1,073 owner reviews. How we score
Agilis CrossClimate is ahead, 78–53
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 72 · 3 tests Owners 85 · 1,073 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 7 in 2020 Commercial Van All Season Tyre Test (dry braking)
“We have the Agilis cross climates on our C-class 3.5t MH and have been utterly delighted with them. They’re quiet, really grippy and give a great ride. What’s not to like?”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
55
Dry
Agilis CrossClimate +2479Why this score
Source ContiVanContact 200 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 60 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 49 87 ContiVanContact 200: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 48.6 = 55
Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 87.1 = 79
No road tests of dry for ContiVanContact 200. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
57
Wet
Agilis CrossClimate +2178Why this score
Source ContiVanContact 200 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 60 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 51 88 ContiVanContact 200: 60% × 60.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.3 = 57
Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 71.2 + 40% × 87.9 = 78
No road tests of wet for ContiVanContact 200. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison78Why this score
Source ContiVanContact 200 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests – 76 Reviews found online – 82 Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 75.6 + 40% × 81.8 = 78
-
54
Comfort
Agilis CrossClimate +1771Why this score
Source ContiVanContact 200 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 55 Reviews found online 47 81 ContiVanContact 200: 40% × 64.3 (est.) + 60% × 46.7 = 54
Agilis CrossClimate: 40% × 54.6 + 60% × 81.1 = 71
No road tests of comfort for ContiVanContact 200. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison75Why this score
Source ContiVanContact 200 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 82 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 81.5 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 75
No owner ratings of noise for Agilis CrossClimate. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
41
Treadwear
Agilis CrossClimate +3778Why this score
Source ContiVanContact 200 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 52 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 25 85 ContiVanContact 200: 60% × 51.6 (est.) + 40% × 24.7 = 41
Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 85 = 78
No road tests of treadwear for ContiVanContact 200. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Agilis CrossClimate. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
53
Handling (owners)
Agilis CrossClimate +2881Why this score
Source ContiVanContact 200 Agilis CrossClimate Reviews found online 53 81 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison71Why this score
Source ContiVanContact 200 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiVanContact 200 | Michelin Agilis CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 53 | 78 |
| Dry | 55 | 79 |
| Wet | 57 | 78 |
| Snow | – | 78 |
| Comfort | 54 | 71 |
| Noise | – | 75 |
| Treadwear | 41 | 78 |
| Handling (owners) | 53 | 81 |
| Efficiency | – | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
53
/ 100
ContiVanContact 200
78
/ 100
Agilis CrossClimate
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | ContiVanContact 200 | Agilis CrossClimate | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #1/6 2019 Promobil Commercial Summer Tire Test | #2/6 promobil 2026 All Season Motorhome and Van Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiVanContact 200
Pros
- Strong initial grip and handling performance in both wet and dry conditions
- Comfortable ride quality
- Acceptable fuel efficiency
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear
- Significant loss of wet-weather traction as the tread depth decreases
- Pronounced uneven wear patterns, specifically scalloping and outer-edge degradation
Tire B Agilis CrossClimate
Pros
- Outstanding wet and winter weather traction
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Stiff sidewalls providing enhanced cornering stability and handling
Cons
- Slightly higher road noise or low drone at certain speeds
- Higher initial purchase price compared to standard options
- A few reports of a minor decrease in fuel economy
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Continental ContiVanContact 200
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Community sentiment toward the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate is largely positive, with owners of vans, RVs, and heavy-duty trucks praising its wet and snow traction, quiet ride, and capability under heavy loads. However, discussions frequently highlight trade-offs such as faster tread wear compared to the Defender series and concerns regarding an NHTSA recall on certain C-metric sizes for snow traction marking non-compliance. Prospective buyers also note confusion regarding the differing directional C-metric and non-directional LT-metric designs.
classbforum.com
·2024-09-21
“I went out and looked at the sidewall of my 6 yr. old Defender LTX's and the tread and sidewall belts are the same as your newer Agilis Cross Climates. Tread 2 polyester + 1 polyamide + 2 steel Sidewall 2 polyester Wish they still made my size so I could just buy a new set of the same as I hate shopping around for tires. But manufacture date on mine is the 48th week of 2018 (coming up on 6 years in a couple of months). They were installed in February 2019. The Agilis is still the highest rated Michelin mode, so I figured on getting those until your post. Tire track has an A/T 2 model that for some reason is $50 per tire more. I can get $80 off until 9/23 so I would like to go ahead and decide, but I'm not there yet.”
forum.ih8mud.com
·5 upvotes ·2019-10-17
“Just an update. I emailed Michelin about the Agilis vs. Defender: My email: I am thinking of using LT 275/65/18 for my Land Cruiser. I cannot decide between Michelin Defender vs. Agilis CrossClimate. I do plan on taking my car off-roading over mild terrain (more rocky, less mud). My Land Cruiser is around 6000 lbs. I read that Agilis has double the nylon reinforcement as Defender and has a tougher sidewall. Are these things true? Is Agilis a tougher tire? On-road, is Agilis as quiet as Defender? How is the rolling resistance between the two (same size)? Thank you in advance. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michelin’s response: We would like to thank you for contacting us! We would recommend that Michelin Defender LTX M/S tires for your luxury SUV. The Michelin Defender LTX M/S tires are going to be quieter, due to the tread grooves been closer. Also, the rolling resistance will be a little better. The Michelin Agilis Cross Climate is an excellent tire that serves well for all weather performance and built with a little more strength for more heavier larger vehicles, like 2500 or 3500 trucks.”
motorhomefun.co.uk
·2 upvotes ·2024-03-08
“We have the Agilis cross climates on our C-class 3.5t MH and have been utterly delighted with them. They’re quiet, really grippy and give a great ride. What’s not to like?”
Top themes
#Heavy load capability#Winter and snow traction#Tread wear longevity#Defender LTX comparison#C-metric recall notice#Ride comfort and noise#Van and RV use
Based on 54 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiVanContact 200 | B · Michelin Agilis CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Van | Van |
| Sizes available | 16 | 22 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 17″ | 15″ – 17″ |
| Sizes in common | 14 | 14 |
Which one should you actually buy?
53
/ 100
Continental ContiVanContact 200
78
/ 100
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Winner: Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — better treadwear, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ContiVanContact 200 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 78 vs 41 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 81 vs 53 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 79 vs 55 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 78 vs 57 on wet.
Tire A · Continental ContiVanContact 200
Tire B · Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiVanContact 200 or Agilis CrossClimate?
Which is better in the wet, ContiVanContact 200 or Agilis CrossClimate?
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 78 vs 57 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiVanContact 200 or Agilis CrossClimate?
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 79 vs 55 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiVanContact 200 or Agilis CrossClimate?
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 71 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiVanContact 200 or Agilis CrossClimate?
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 78 vs 41 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology