Tests – · none yet Owners 47 · 12 reviews
Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ vs Continental ExtremeContact DWS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 12 + 16 owner reviews. How we score
ExtremeContact DWS is ahead, 67–55
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 16 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
55
Dry
ExtremeContact DWS +1065Why this score
Source ControlContact Sport SRS+ ExtremeContact DWS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 48 63 ControlContact Sport SRS+: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 47.7 = 55
ExtremeContact DWS: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.4 = 65
No road tests of dry for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for ExtremeContact DWS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
58
Wet
ExtremeContact DWS +1270Why this score
Source ControlContact Sport SRS+ ExtremeContact DWS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 53 70 ControlContact Sport SRS+: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 53.2 = 58
ExtremeContact DWS: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 70
No road tests of wet for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for ExtremeContact DWS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
58
Snow
ExtremeContact DWS +866Why this score
Source ControlContact Sport SRS+ ExtremeContact DWS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 49 63 ControlContact Sport SRS+: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 49.1 = 58
ExtremeContact DWS: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.3 = 66
No road tests of snow for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for ExtremeContact DWS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
46
Comfort
ExtremeContact DWS +2066Why this score
Source ControlContact Sport SRS+ ExtremeContact DWS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 35 65 ControlContact Sport SRS+: 40% × 61.9 (est.) + 60% × 34.9 = 46
ExtremeContact DWS: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 65.2 = 66
No road tests of comfort for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for ExtremeContact DWS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison60Why this score
Source ControlContact Sport SRS+ ExtremeContact DWS Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online – 51 ExtremeContact DWS: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 50.6 = 60
No road tests of noise for ExtremeContact DWS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
54
Treadwear
ExtremeContact DWS +963Why this score
Source ControlContact Sport SRS+ ExtremeContact DWS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 46 61 ControlContact Sport SRS+: 60% × 59 (est.) + 40% × 45.6 = 54
ExtremeContact DWS: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 60.5 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for ExtremeContact DWS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
43
Handling (owners)
ExtremeContact DWS +2568Why this score
Source ControlContact Sport SRS+ ExtremeContact DWS Reviews found online 43 68
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ | Continental ExtremeContact DWS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 55 | 67 |
| Dry | 55 | 65 |
| Wet | 58 | 70 |
| Snow | 58 | 66 |
| Comfort | 46 | 66 |
| Noise | – | 60 |
| Treadwear | 54 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 43 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ControlContact Sport SRS+
ExtremeContact DWS
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ControlContact Sport SRS+
Pros
- Strong dry and wet pavement traction
- Solid cornering stability and steering response
- Good value proposition for budget-conscious drivers
Cons
- Excessive road noise and cabin drone
- Noticeable vibration and harshness over uneven surfaces
- Inconsistent tread life reported by some users
Tire B ExtremeContact DWS
Pros
- Exceptional grip and safety in wet weather conditions and heavy rain
- Superior winter and snow performance compared to many competing all-season tires
- Smooth, comfortable ride quality with compliant road manners
Cons
- Softer sidewalls reduce sharp handling response and feel when pushed at or beyond the limit
- Some users report higher-than-expected road noise
- Mixed performance in severe or deep winter conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ | B · Continental ExtremeContact DWS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 560 A - AA A | 540 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+
Continental ExtremeContact DWS
Winner: Continental ExtremeContact DWS — better handling, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Continental ExtremeContact DWS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS scores 68 vs 43 on handling.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS scores 66 vs 46 on comfort.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS scores 70 vs 58 on wet.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS scores 65 vs 55 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ControlContact Sport SRS+ or ExtremeContact DWS?
Which is better in the wet, ControlContact Sport SRS+ or ExtremeContact DWS?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS, 70 vs 58 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ControlContact Sport SRS+ or ExtremeContact DWS?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS, 65 vs 55 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ControlContact Sport SRS+ or ExtremeContact DWS?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS, 66 vs 58 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, ControlContact Sport SRS+ or ExtremeContact DWS?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS, 66 vs 46 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ControlContact Sport SRS+ or ExtremeContact DWS?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS, 63 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology