tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ vs Continental ProContact — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 12 + 12 owner reviews. How we score

ControlContact Sport SRS+ leads, 55–53 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · ControlContact Sport SRS+ or ProContact on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental ProContact
Tire BContinental

ProContact

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 45 · 12 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 55

    Dry

    ControlContact Sport SRS+ +3
    52
    Why this score
    SourceControlContact Sport SRS+ProContact
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online4843

    ControlContact Sport SRS+: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 47.7 = 55

    ProContact: 60% × 57.7 (est.) + 40% × 43 = 52

    No road tests of dry for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 58

    Wet

    ControlContact Sport SRS+ +1
    57
    Why this score
    SourceControlContact Sport SRS+ProContact
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online5352

    ControlContact Sport SRS+: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 53.2 = 58

    ProContact: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.5 = 57

    No road tests of wet for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 58

    Snow

    ControlContact Sport SRS+ +6
    52
    Why this score
    SourceControlContact Sport SRS+ProContact
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online4939

    ControlContact Sport SRS+: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 49.1 = 58

    ProContact: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 39.3 = 52

    No road tests of snow for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 46

    Comfort

    ProContact +2
    48
    Why this score
    SourceControlContact Sport SRS+ProContact
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online3539

    ControlContact Sport SRS+: 40% × 61.9 (est.) + 60% × 34.9 = 46

    ProContact: 40% × 62.6 (est.) + 60% × 38.6 = 48

    No road tests of comfort for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 54

    Treadwear

    ControlContact Sport SRS+ +1
    53
    Why this score
    SourceControlContact Sport SRS+ProContact
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online4644

    ControlContact Sport SRS+: 60% × 59 (est.) + 40% × 45.6 = 54

    ProContact: 60% × 58.3 (est.) + 40% × 43.8 = 53

    No road tests of treadwear for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 43

    Handling (owners)

    ProContact +2
    45
    Why this score
    SourceControlContact Sport SRS+ProContact
    Reviews found online4345
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ControlContact Sport SRS+Continental ProContact
Relative Score 55 53
Dry 55 52
Wet 58 57
Snow 58 52
Comfort 46 48
Treadwear 54 53
Handling (owners) 43 45

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ControlContact Sport SRS+

± 8

ProContact

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ControlContact Sport SRS+

Pros

  • Strong dry and wet pavement traction
  • Solid cornering stability and steering response
  • Good value proposition for budget-conscious drivers

Cons

  • Excessive road noise and cabin drone
  • Noticeable vibration and harshness over uneven surfaces
  • Inconsistent tread life reported by some users
All owner themes in the ControlContact Sport SRS+ review

Tire B ProContact

Pros

  • Predictable and safe handling on dry pavement
  • Competent performance in high-heat conditions
  • Generally comfortable ride quality for calm, daily driving

Cons

  • Significant increase in road noise as the tire ages
  • Premature tread wear and limited mileage lifespan
  • Structural reliability issues, including sidewall bubbles and flat-spotting
All owner themes in the ProContact review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ B · Continental ProContact
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
UTQG560 A - AA A—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+

Continental ProContact

Narrow edge: Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ — better snow and dry. Where the Continental ProContact is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Continental ProContact rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ scores 58 vs 52 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ scores 55 vs 52 on dry.

Tire A · Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Continental ProContact
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ControlContact Sport SRS+ or ProContact?

Which is better in the wet, ControlContact Sport SRS+ or ProContact?

Neither, by our numbers: 58 vs 57 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, ControlContact Sport SRS+ or ProContact?

Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+, 55 vs 52 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ControlContact Sport SRS+ or ProContact?

Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+, 58 vs 52 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, ControlContact Sport SRS+ or ProContact?

Neither, by our numbers: 46 vs 48 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, ControlContact Sport SRS+ or ProContact?

Neither, by our numbers: 54 vs 53 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology