Head-to-head Updated

Continental Cross Contact A/T vs Firestone Destination A/T — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 14 + 80 owner reviews. How we score

Destination A/T is ahead, 68–62

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone Destination A/T
Tire BFirestone

Destination A/T

All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires

Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 80 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 64

    Dry

    Destination A/T +3
    67
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TDestination A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6267

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64

    Destination A/T: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 67

    No road tests of dry for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Destination A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 64

    Wet

    Destination A/T +6
    70
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TDestination A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6370

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64

    Destination A/T: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 70

    No road tests of wet for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Destination A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 53

    Snow

    Destination A/T +16
    69
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TDestination A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online4168

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 41.3 = 53

    Destination A/T: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 69

    No road tests of snow for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Destination A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    Destination A/T +3
    68
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TDestination A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6067

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 65

    Destination A/T: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for Cross Contact A/T or Destination A/T. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    69
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TDestination A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–71

    Destination A/T: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.9 = 69

    No road tests of noise for Destination A/T. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    Destination A/T +2
    67
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TDestination A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6468

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65

    Destination A/T: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Destination A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 62

    Handling (owners)

    Destination A/T +3
    65
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TDestination A/T
    Reviews found online6265
Scores at a glance
Continental Cross Contact A/T vs Firestone Destination A/T: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental Cross Contact A/TFirestone Destination A/T
Relative Score 62 68
Dry 64 67
Wet 64 70
Snow 53 69
Comfort 65 68
Noise – 69
Treadwear 65 67
Handling (owners) 62 65

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Cross Contact A/T

Destination A/T

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryCross Contact A/TDestination A/TΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #7/7 2017 Drive Out Off Road 4x4 Tyre Test #8/13 2018 SA4x4 All-Terrain Tire Test R17 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Cross Contact A/T

Pros

  • Excellent on-road comfort and handling with acceptable noise levels
  • High potential longevity and mileage for many users, with sets lasting upwards of 50,000 to 80,000 km/miles
  • Competent dry and wet performance on paved surfaces

Cons

  • Susceptibility to punctures and fragile sidewalls reported by some drivers
  • Rapid, premature tread wear experienced by certain users
  • Poor traction and spinning issues in winter conditions such as snow and ice
All owner themes in the Cross Contact A/T review

Tire B Destination A/T

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and low road noise for an all-terrain tire
  • Strong value proposition with competitive pricing
  • Reliable traction in diverse conditions including snow, sand, and wet pavement

Cons

  • Noticeable decline in wet-weather traction as tread depth wears down
  • Tendency to hydroplane in deep standing water
  • Limited performance in deep, thick mud compared to more aggressive mud-terrain tires
All owner themes in the Destination A/T review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental Cross Contact A/T B · Firestone Destination A/T
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll Season All Terrain and Off Road tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Tread depth—14/32″
UTQG—460 A B
Sidewall—Outlined White Lettering
Max pressure—50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental Cross Contact A/T

Firestone Destination A/T

Winner: Firestone Destination A/T — better snow, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental Cross Contact A/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Firestone Destination A/T scores 69 vs 53 on snow.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Firestone Destination A/T scores 70 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Firestone Destination A/T scores 67 vs 64 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Firestone Destination A/T scores 68 vs 65 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental Cross Contact A/T
Tire B · Firestone Destination A/T

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Cross Contact A/T or Destination A/T?

Which is better in the wet, Cross Contact A/T or Destination A/T?

Firestone Destination A/T, 70 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Cross Contact A/T or Destination A/T?

Firestone Destination A/T, 67 vs 64 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Cross Contact A/T or Destination A/T?

Firestone Destination A/T, 69 vs 53 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Cross Contact A/T or Destination A/T?

Firestone Destination A/T, 68 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Cross Contact A/T or Destination A/T?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology