Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 14 reviews
Continental Cross Contact A/T vs Firestone Destination LE2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 14 + 102 owner reviews. How we score
Destination LE2 is ahead, 68–62
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 102 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
Destination LE2 +468Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Destination LE2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 62 68 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64
Destination LE2: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.5 = 68
No road tests of dry for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Destination LE2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
64
Wet
Destination LE2 +569Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Destination LE2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 63 69 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64
Destination LE2: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 69
No road tests of wet for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Destination LE2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
53
Snow
Destination LE2 +1366Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Destination LE2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 41 63 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 41.3 = 53
Destination LE2: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.8 = 66
No road tests of snow for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Destination LE2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
65
Comfort
Destination LE2 +166Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Destination LE2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 60 64 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 65
Destination LE2: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.5 = 66
No road tests of comfort for Cross Contact A/T or Destination LE2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison69Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Destination LE2 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 72 Destination LE2: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.6 = 69
No road tests of noise for Destination LE2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
Destination LE2 +267Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Destination LE2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 64 67 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65
Destination LE2: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Destination LE2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
62
Handling (owners)
Destination LE2 +668Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Destination LE2 Reviews found online 62 68
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental Cross Contact A/T | Firestone Destination LE2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 68 |
| Dry | 64 | 68 |
| Wet | 64 | 69 |
| Snow | 53 | 66 |
| Comfort | 65 | 66 |
| Noise | – | 69 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 62 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Cross Contact A/T
Destination LE2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Cross Contact A/T
Pros
- Excellent on-road comfort and handling with acceptable noise levels
- High potential longevity and mileage for many users, with sets lasting upwards of 50,000 to 80,000 km/miles
- Competent dry and wet performance on paved surfaces
Cons
- Susceptibility to punctures and fragile sidewalls reported by some drivers
- Rapid, premature tread wear experienced by certain users
- Poor traction and spinning issues in winter conditions such as snow and ice
Tire B Destination LE2
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet traction
- Affordable, high-value pricing
- Quiet and comfortable highway ride
Cons
- Tendency to pick up and retain small stones from gravel roads
- Occasional reports of higher-than-expected road noise on specific vehicle models
- Isolated instances of balancing difficulties or premature wear
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental Cross Contact A/T | B · Firestone Destination LE2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 5 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | — | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 520 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental Cross Contact A/T
Firestone Destination LE2
Winner: Firestone Destination LE2 — better snow, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental Cross Contact A/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Firestone Destination LE2 scores 66 vs 53 on snow.
Firestone Destination LE2 scores 68 vs 62 on handling.
Firestone Destination LE2 scores 69 vs 64 on wet.
Firestone Destination LE2 scores 68 vs 64 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Cross Contact A/T or Destination LE2?
Which is better in the wet, Cross Contact A/T or Destination LE2?
Firestone Destination LE2, 69 vs 64 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Cross Contact A/T or Destination LE2?
Firestone Destination LE2, 68 vs 64 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Cross Contact A/T or Destination LE2?
Firestone Destination LE2, 66 vs 53 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Cross Contact A/T or Destination LE2?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 66 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Cross Contact A/T or Destination LE2?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology