Head-to-head Updated

Continental Cross Contact A/T vs Hankook Dynapro HP2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 14 + 10 owner reviews. How we score

Cross Contact A/T is ahead, 62–57

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Dynapro HP2
Tire BHankook

Dynapro HP2

All-Season

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 10 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 64

    Dry

    Cross Contact A/T +5
    59
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TDynapro HP2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online6255

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64

    Dynapro HP2: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 54.6 = 59

    No road tests of dry for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 64

    Wet

    Cross Contact A/T +7
    57
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TDynapro HP2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6353

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64

    Dynapro HP2: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 52.7 = 57

    No road tests of wet for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 53

    Snow

    Dynapro HP2 +6
    59
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TDynapro HP2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online4152

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 41.3 = 53

    Dynapro HP2: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 51.9 = 59

    No road tests of snow for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    Cross Contact A/T +5
    60
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TDynapro HP2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6051

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 65

    Dynapro HP2: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 50.5 = 60

    No road tests of comfort for Cross Contact A/T or Dynapro HP2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    63
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TDynapro HP2
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–58

    Dynapro HP2: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 57.7 = 63

    No road tests of noise for Dynapro HP2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    Cross Contact A/T +11
    54
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TDynapro HP2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6446

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65

    Dynapro HP2: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 46 = 54

    No road tests of treadwear for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 62

    Handling (owners)

    Cross Contact A/T +11
    51
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TDynapro HP2
    Reviews found online6251
Scores at a glance
Continental Cross Contact A/T vs Hankook Dynapro HP2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental Cross Contact A/THankook Dynapro HP2
Relative Score 62 57
Dry 64 59
Wet 64 57
Snow 53 59
Comfort 65 60
Noise – 63
Treadwear 65 54
Handling (owners) 62 51

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Cross Contact A/T

Dynapro HP2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Cross Contact A/T

Pros

  • Excellent on-road comfort and handling with acceptable noise levels
  • High potential longevity and mileage for many users, with sets lasting upwards of 50,000 to 80,000 km/miles
  • Competent dry and wet performance on paved surfaces

Cons

  • Susceptibility to punctures and fragile sidewalls reported by some drivers
  • Rapid, premature tread wear experienced by certain users
  • Poor traction and spinning issues in winter conditions such as snow and ice
All owner themes in the Cross Contact A/T review

Tire B Dynapro HP2

Pros

  • Reliable handling and roadability on dry pavement
  • Good fuel economy and low rolling resistance contributing to high MPG
  • Capably handles towing duties on all-wheel-drive vehicles

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear reported by multiple users
  • Poor wet weather performance and dangerous sliding tendencies in rain
  • Inconsistent snow traction, with some users noting a lack of confidence in winter conditions
All owner themes in the Dynapro HP2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental Cross Contact A/T B · Hankook Dynapro HP2
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll-Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available—44
Rim diameters—15″ – 20″

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental Cross Contact A/T

Hankook Dynapro HP2

Winner: Continental Cross Contact A/T — better treadwear, handling and wet. Pick the Hankook Dynapro HP2 if snow matters most to you. Continental Cross Contact A/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Hankook Dynapro HP2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental Cross Contact A/T scores 65 vs 54 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental Cross Contact A/T scores 62 vs 51 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental Cross Contact A/T scores 64 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Dynapro HP2 scores 59 vs 53 on snow.

Tire A · Continental Cross Contact A/T
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro HP2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Cross Contact A/T or Dynapro HP2?

Which is better in the wet, Cross Contact A/T or Dynapro HP2?

Continental Cross Contact A/T, 64 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Cross Contact A/T or Dynapro HP2?

Continental Cross Contact A/T, 64 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Cross Contact A/T or Dynapro HP2?

Hankook Dynapro HP2, 59 vs 53 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Cross Contact A/T or Dynapro HP2?

Continental Cross Contact A/T, 65 vs 60 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Cross Contact A/T or Dynapro HP2?

Continental Cross Contact A/T, 65 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology