Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental CrossContact H/T vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 9 + 12 owner reviews. How we score

CrossContact H/T is ahead, 65–60

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 64

    Dry

    CrossContact H/T +3
    61
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact H/TGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6257

    CrossContact H/T: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 64

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 61

    No road tests of dry for CrossContact H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 67

    Wet

    CrossContact H/T +9
    58
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact H/TGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online6653

    CrossContact H/T: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 67

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 60.9 (est.) + 40% × 53 = 58

    No road tests of wet for CrossContact H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 61

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact H/TGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)–
    Reviews found online56–

    CrossContact H/T: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 55.9 = 61

    No road tests of snow for CrossContact H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    CrossContact H/T +2
    63
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact H/TGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6360

    CrossContact H/T: 40% × 68.1 (est.) + 60% × 63.2 = 65

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 40% × 67.5 (est.) + 60% × 59.9 = 63

    No road tests of comfort for CrossContact H/T or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 65

    Treadwear

    CrossContact H/T +1
    64
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact H/TGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6563

    CrossContact H/T: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 65

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  6. 63

    Handling (owners)

    CrossContact H/T +7
    56
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact H/TGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Reviews found online6356
Scores at a glance
Continental CrossContact H/T vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental CrossContact H/TYokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Relative Score 65 60
Dry 64 61
Wet 67 58
Snow 61 –
Comfort 65 63
Treadwear 65 64
Handling (owners) 63 56

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

CrossContact H/T

± 8

Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossContact H/T

Pros

  • High level of ride comfort and soft rubber composition that absorbs road bumps well
  • Quiet and noiseless performance during early usage
  • Positive impact on fuel efficiency and lower rolling resistance

Cons

  • Reduced traction and sliding tendencies in wet conditions over time
  • High-speed vibrations and balancing issues
  • Stiff sidewalls and harshness reported by some drivers
All owner themes in the CrossContact H/T review

Tire B Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Improved fuel economy and low rolling resistance
  • Adequate dry road grip and handling

Cons

  • Dangerous or unreliable wet weather traction, particularly lateral grip and cornering
  • Prone to wheel spin on damp or wet surfaces
  • Accelerated or uneven tread wear reported on certain crossover and SUV models
All owner themes in the Geolandar G055 Blue Earth review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact H/T B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle type—SUV and 4x4
Sizes available43—
Rim diameters15″ – 21″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental CrossContact H/T

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Winner: Continental CrossContact H/T — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental CrossContact H/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental CrossContact H/T scores 67 vs 58 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental CrossContact H/T scores 63 vs 56 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental CrossContact H/T scores 64 vs 61 on dry.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact H/T
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CrossContact H/T or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Which is better in the wet, CrossContact H/T or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Continental CrossContact H/T, 67 vs 58 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact H/T or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Continental CrossContact H/T, 64 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, CrossContact H/T or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 63 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, CrossContact H/T or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 64 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology