Head-to-head Updated

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Bridgestone Turanza EL400-02 RFT — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 26 + 1 owner reviews. How we score

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 76

    Dry

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Turanza EL400-02 RFT
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70–
    Reviews found online84–

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 83.5 = 76

  2. 80

    Wet

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Turanza EL400-02 RFT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 78 (est.)–
    Reviews found online84–

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 77.9 (est.) + 40% × 83.6 = 80

    No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 53

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Turanza EL400-02 RFT
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests40–
    Reviews found online72–

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 40.3 + 40% × 72.2 = 53

  4. 77

    Comfort

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Turanza EL400-02 RFT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)–
    Reviews found online80–

    CrossContact LX25: 40% × 71.2 (est.) + 60% × 80.2 = 77

    No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 71

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Turanza EL400-02 RFT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online78–

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 78 = 71

    No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Turanza EL400-02 RFT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)–
    Reviews found online76–

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 72

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 79

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Turanza EL400-02 RFT
    Reviews found online79–
Scores at a glance
Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Bridgestone Turanza EL400-02 RFT: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental CrossContact LX25Bridgestone Turanza EL400-02 RFT
Relative Score 73 –
Dry 76 –
Wet 80 –
Snow 53 –
Comfort 77 –
Noise 71 –
Treadwear 72 –
Handling (owners) 79 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

CrossContact LX25

Turanza EL400-02 RFT

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossContact LX25

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
  • Significantly improved wet and snow traction
  • Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness

Cons

  • Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
  • Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
  • Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
All owner themes in the CrossContact LX25 review

Tire B Turanza EL400-02 RFT

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact LX25 B · Bridgestone Turanza EL400-02 RFT
CategoryAll SeasonAll-Season tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available40—
Rim diameters16″ – 22″—
Tread depth10 - 12/32″—
UTQG740 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental CrossContact LX25

Bridgestone Turanza EL400-02 RFT

Only Continental CrossContact LX25 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX25
Tire B · Bridgestone Turanza EL400-02 RFT

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology