Tests 59 · 1 test Owners 79 · 26 reviews
Continental WinterContact TS830 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Continental WinterContact TS830 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 26 + 30 owner reviews. How we score
WinterContact TS830 is ahead, 82–77
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 87 · 30 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
WinterContact TS830 +580Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 WinterContact TS830 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 70 ≈ 76 (est.) Reviews found online 83 87 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 82.8 = 75
WinterContact TS830: 60% × 75.9 (est.) + 40% × 87 = 80
No road tests of dry for WinterContact TS830. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
80
Wet
WinterContact TS830 +787Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 WinterContact TS830 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 78 (est.) ≈ 83 (est.) Reviews found online 83 93 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 77.6 (est.) + 40% × 83.2 = 80
WinterContact TS830: 60% × 83.1 (est.) + 40% × 93.3 = 87
No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for WinterContact TS830. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
53
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 WinterContact TS830 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 40 – Reviews found online 72 – CrossContact LX25: 60% × 40.2 + 40% × 71.8 = 53
-
76
Comfort
WinterContact TS830 +581Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 WinterContact TS830 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 79 86 CrossContact LX25: 40% × 70.9 (est.) + 60% × 79.4 = 76
WinterContact TS830: 40% × 72.3 (est.) + 60% × 86.2 = 81
No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for WinterContact TS830. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
71
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 WinterContact TS830 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 77 – CrossContact LX25: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 77.4 = 71
No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
72
Treadwear
WinterContact TS830 +375Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 WinterContact TS830 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 76 81 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 72
WinterContact TS830: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 80.9 = 75
No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for WinterContact TS830. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
79
Handling (owners)
WinterContact TS830 +786Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 WinterContact TS830 Reviews found online 79 86
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental CrossContact LX25 | Continental WinterContact TS830 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 77 | 82 |
| Dry | 75 | 80 |
| Wet | 80 | 87 |
| Snow | 53 | – |
| Comfort | 76 | 81 |
| Noise | 71 | – |
| Treadwear | 72 | 75 |
| Handling (owners) | 79 | 86 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
CrossContact LX25
WinterContact TS830
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | CrossContact LX25 | WinterContact TS830 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/3 Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady | #5/14 2011 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A CrossContact LX25
Pros
- Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
- Significantly improved wet and snow traction
- Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness
Cons
- Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
- Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
- Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
Tire B WinterContact TS830
Pros
- Outstanding traction and braking performance on snow and ice
- Excellent grip and stability in cold, wet, and slushy conditions
- Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality for a winter tire
Cons
- Slightly increased noise levels compared to some summer tires (though still quiet for the category)
- Reduced performance and 'tightness' as temperatures rise above 15°C
- Premium price point compared to budget alternatives
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental CrossContact LX25 | B · Continental WinterContact TS830 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Winter |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 40 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 740 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental CrossContact LX25
Continental WinterContact TS830
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS830 — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental WinterContact TS830 scores 87 vs 80 on wet.
Continental WinterContact TS830 scores 86 vs 79 on handling.
Continental WinterContact TS830 scores 80 vs 75 on dry.
Continental WinterContact TS830 scores 81 vs 76 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
CrossContact LX25 or WinterContact TS830?
Which is better in the wet, CrossContact LX25 or WinterContact TS830?
Continental WinterContact TS830, 87 vs 80 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact LX25 or WinterContact TS830?
Continental WinterContact TS830, 80 vs 75 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, CrossContact LX25 or WinterContact TS830?
Continental WinterContact TS830, 81 vs 76 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, CrossContact LX25 or WinterContact TS830?
Continental WinterContact TS830, 75 vs 72 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology