Tests 59 · 1 test Owners 79 · 26 reviews
Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Firestone Winterforce 2 UV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 26 + 17 owner reviews. How we score
CrossContact LX25 is ahead, 72–66
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 17 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
CrossContact LX25 +1065Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Winterforce 2 UV Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 70 ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 83 64 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 82.8 = 75
Winterforce 2 UV: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.7 = 65
No road tests of dry for Winterforce 2 UV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
80
Wet
CrossContact LX25 +1070Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Winterforce 2 UV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 78 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 83 70 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 77.6 (est.) + 40% × 83.2 = 80
Winterforce 2 UV: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 70
No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Winterforce 2 UV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
53
Snow
Winterforce 2 UV +1972Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Winterforce 2 UV Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 40 ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 72 73 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 40.2 + 40% × 71.8 = 53
Winterforce 2 UV: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 73 = 72
No road tests of snow for Winterforce 2 UV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
76
Comfort
CrossContact LX25 +1561Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Winterforce 2 UV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 79 57 CrossContact LX25: 40% × 70.9 (est.) + 60% × 79.4 = 76
Winterforce 2 UV: 40% × 66.4 (est.) + 60% × 57.1 = 61
No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Winterforce 2 UV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
71
Noise
CrossContact LX25 +1061Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Winterforce 2 UV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 77 54 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 77.4 = 71
Winterforce 2 UV: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 53.9 = 61
No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX25 or Winterforce 2 UV. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
72
Treadwear
CrossContact LX25 +1062Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Winterforce 2 UV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 76 59 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 72
Winterforce 2 UV: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 58.7 = 62
No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Winterforce 2 UV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
79
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Winterforce 2 UV Reviews found online 79 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental CrossContact LX25 | Firestone Winterforce 2 UV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 66 |
| Dry | 75 | 65 |
| Wet | 80 | 70 |
| Snow | 53 | 72 |
| Comfort | 76 | 61 |
| Noise | 71 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 62 |
| Handling (owners) | 79 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
CrossContact LX25
Winterforce 2 UV
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | CrossContact LX25 | Winterforce 2 UV | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/3 Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady | #8/8 2022 Consumer Reports Winter/Snow Truck/SUV Tires | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A CrossContact LX25
Pros
- Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
- Significantly improved wet and snow traction
- Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness
Cons
- Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
- Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
- Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
Tire B Winterforce 2 UV
Pros
- Strong snow traction: one 4WD owner reported no slipping in 8 inches of snow, and an Explorer owner said it never needed 4x4 after 47 inches of snow in a week
- Good value for the money: reviewers repeatedly describe it as a great winter tire for the price, and one calls it the best balance of price and longevity
- Good wet-weather performance reported by some, including no hydroplaning on puddles and 'great all around' traction
Cons
- Increased road noise is mentioned by some reviewers, attributed to the aggressive winter tread, though others describe noise as very low
- Reduced wet-weather starting traction: one reviewer reports wheelspin when pulling away from a red light in the rain
- Fast wear if used in warm weather: one reviewer who ran them in summer notes this is not recommended and that they wear quickly
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental CrossContact LX25 | B · Firestone Winterforce 2 UV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Winter |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 40 | 30 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | 12/32″ |
| UTQG | 740 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | 44 psi |
| Sizes in common | 11 | 11 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental CrossContact LX25
Firestone Winterforce 2 UV
Winner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better comfort, dry and wet. Pick the Firestone Winterforce 2 UV if snow matters most to you. Firestone Winterforce 2 UV rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 17 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Firestone Winterforce 2 UV scores 72 vs 53 on snow.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 76 vs 61 on comfort.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 75 vs 65 on dry.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 80 vs 70 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
CrossContact LX25 or Winterforce 2 UV?
Which is better in the wet, CrossContact LX25 or Winterforce 2 UV?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 80 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact LX25 or Winterforce 2 UV?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 75 vs 65 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, CrossContact LX25 or Winterforce 2 UV?
Firestone Winterforce 2 UV, 72 vs 53 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, CrossContact LX25 or Winterforce 2 UV?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 71 vs 61 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, CrossContact LX25 or Winterforce 2 UV?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 76 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, CrossContact LX25 or Winterforce 2 UV?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 72 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology