Head-to-head Updated

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 26 + 13 owner reviews. How we score

CrossContact LX25 is ahead, 73–47

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    CrossContact LX25 +29
    46
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Ultra Grip Performance 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70≈ 54 (est.)
    Reviews found online8335

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 82.8 = 75

    Ultra Grip Performance 2: 60% × 54.2 (est.) + 40% × 34.6 = 46

    No road tests of dry for Ultra Grip Performance 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 80

    Wet

    CrossContact LX25 +31
    49
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Ultra Grip Performance 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 78 (est.)≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online8341

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 77.5 (est.) + 40% × 83.1 = 80

    Ultra Grip Performance 2: 60% × 54.6 (est.) + 40% × 41.3 = 49

    No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Ultra Grip Performance 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 53

    Snow

    CrossContact LX25 +10
    43
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Ultra Grip Performance 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests40≈ 56 (est.)
    Reviews found online7224

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 40.2 + 40% × 71.7 = 53

    Ultra Grip Performance 2: 60% × 55.8 (est.) + 40% × 24.2 = 43

    No road tests of snow for Ultra Grip Performance 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 76

    Comfort

    CrossContact LX25 +25
    51
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Ultra Grip Performance 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online7942

    CrossContact LX25: 40% × 70.8 (est.) + 60% × 79.3 = 76

    Ultra Grip Performance 2: 40% × 63.3 (est.) + 60% × 42 = 51

    No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Ultra Grip Performance 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 71

    Noise

    CrossContact LX25 +14
    57
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Ultra Grip Performance 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7744

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 77.3 = 71

    Ultra Grip Performance 2: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 43.5 = 57

    No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX25 or Ultra Grip Performance 2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    CrossContact LX25 +25
    47
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Ultra Grip Performance 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online7635

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 72

    Ultra Grip Performance 2: 60% × 55.3 (est.) + 40% × 35 = 47

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ultra Grip Performance 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 79

    Handling (owners)

    CrossContact LX25 +38
    41
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Ultra Grip Performance 2
    Reviews found online7941
Scores at a glance
Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental CrossContact LX25Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2
Relative Score 73 47
Dry 75 46
Wet 80 49
Snow 53 43
Comfort 76 51
Noise 71 57
Treadwear 72 47
Handling (owners) 79 41

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

CrossContact LX25

± 8

Ultra Grip Performance 2

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryCrossContact LX25Ultra Grip Performance 2ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #2/3 Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady #4/12 2011 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossContact LX25

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
  • Significantly improved wet and snow traction
  • Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness

Cons

  • Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
  • Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
  • Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
All owner themes in the CrossContact LX25 review

Tire B Ultra Grip Performance 2

Pros

  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality on dry and wet tarmac
  • Agile handling and reliable grip in wet conditions and light-to-medium snow
  • Good directional tread design for effective water and slush evacuation

Cons

  • Severely lacking traction and grip on packed snow and ice according to dissatisfied users
  • Triggers frequent ABS activation and wheel spin during acceleration and braking in wintry precipitation
  • Vague handling feel on tarmac for certain drivers
All owner themes in the Ultra Grip Performance 2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact LX25 B · Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2
CategoryAll SeasonWinter
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available406
Rim diameters16″ – 22″16″ – 17″
Tread depth10 - 12/32″8/32″
UTQG740 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White LetteringBlackwall
Max pressure44 - 51 psi51 psi
Sizes in common11

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental CrossContact LX25

Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2

Winner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 79 vs 41 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 80 vs 49 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 75 vs 46 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 76 vs 51 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX25
Tire B · Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CrossContact LX25 or Ultra Grip Performance 2?

Which is better in the wet, CrossContact LX25 or Ultra Grip Performance 2?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 80 vs 49 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact LX25 or Ultra Grip Performance 2?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 75 vs 46 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, CrossContact LX25 or Ultra Grip Performance 2?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 53 vs 43 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, CrossContact LX25 or Ultra Grip Performance 2?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 71 vs 57 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, CrossContact LX25 or Ultra Grip Performance 2?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 76 vs 51 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, CrossContact LX25 or Ultra Grip Performance 2?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 72 vs 47 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology