tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 4 road tests and 26 + 32 owner reviews. How we score

Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1 leads, 77–73 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1 or CrossContact LX25 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1
Tire BGoodyear

Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1

Winter

± 7

Tests 72 · 4 tests Owners 81 · 32 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2017 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test (wet braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    CrossContact LX25 +1
    74
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 4 tests7069
    Reviews found online8380

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 82.7 = 75

    Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1: 60% × 69.5 + 40% × 80.4 = 74

  2. 80

    Wet

    Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1 +3
    83
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 77 (est.)82
    Reviews found online8386

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 77.5 (est.) + 40% × 83.1 = 80

    Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1: 60% × 81.9 + 40% × 85.7 = 83

    No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 53

    Snow

    Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1 +24
    77
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 4 tests4076
    Reviews found online7278

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 40.2 + 40% × 71.8 = 53

    Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1: 60% × 76.1 + 40% × 77.5 = 77

  4. 76

    Comfort

    Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1 +1
    77
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7980

    CrossContact LX25: 40% × 70.8 (est.) + 60% × 79.4 = 76

    Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1: 40% × 71 (est.) + 60% × 80.3 = 77

    No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 71

    Noise

    CrossContact LX25 +4
    67
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 66 (est.)68
    Reviews found online78≈ 66 (est.)

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 77.5 = 71

    Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1: 60% × 67.7 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 67

    No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    CrossContact LX25 +1
    71
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 70 (est.)63
    Reviews found online7682

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 72

    Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1: 60% × 63.4 + 40% × 81.7 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 79

    Handling (owners)

    Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1 +4
    83
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1
    Reviews found online7983
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    72
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests–72
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental CrossContact LX25Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1
Relative Score 73 77
Dry 75 74
Wet 80 83
Snow 53 77
Comfort 76 77
Noise 71 67
Treadwear 72 71
Handling (owners) 79 83
Efficiency – 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

CrossContact LX25

± 7

Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryCrossContact LX25Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 93% #2/3 · Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady 98% #6/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #2/3 Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady #8/16 2019 Teknikens Värld Large Winter Tire Test R17 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossContact LX25

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
  • Significantly improved wet and snow traction
  • Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness

Cons

  • Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
  • Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
  • Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
All owner themes in the CrossContact LX25 review

Tire B Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather and slush performance
  • Strong traction and braking capabilities in snow
  • High durability and long tread life

Cons

  • Increased road noise reported by some users at higher speeds
  • Vague steering feedback and sidewall flex during spirited dry-road driving
  • Occasional loss of grip in dry conditions or when temperatures exceed 7°C
All owner themes in the Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact LX25 B · Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1
CategoryAll SeasonWinter
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4017
Rim diameters16″ – 22″16″ – 20″
Tread depth10 - 12/32″9 - 11/32″
UTQG740 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White LetteringRaised Black Lettering
Max pressure44 - 51 psi50 psi
Sizes in common44

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental CrossContact LX25

Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1

Narrow edge: Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1 — better snow and wet. Pick the Continental CrossContact LX25 if noise matters most to you.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1 scores 77 vs 53 on snow.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 71 vs 67 on noise.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1 scores 83 vs 80 on wet.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX25
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CrossContact LX25 or Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1?

Which is better in the wet, CrossContact LX25 or Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1?

Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1, 83 vs 80 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact LX25 or Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1?

Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 74 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, CrossContact LX25 or Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1?

Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1, 77 vs 53 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, CrossContact LX25 or Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 71 vs 67 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, CrossContact LX25 or Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1?

Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 77 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, CrossContact LX25 or Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 71 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology