tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Michelin Primacy HP — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 26 + 204 owner reviews. How we score

CrossContact LX25 is ahead, 77–64

Check price on Amazon · CrossContact LX25 or Primacy HP on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Primacy HP
Tire BMichelin

Primacy HP

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 204 reviews

“Sounds as if Aus is rationalising inventory John. Pity because the HP is a good dirt road tyre with stones around. That said the XM2 is also a tough tyre & designed to take knocks that would damage High Performance summer tyres.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 76

    Dry

    CrossContact LX25 +11
    65
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Primacy HP
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online8363

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 83.4 = 76

    Primacy HP: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 65

    No road tests of dry for Primacy HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 80

    Wet

    CrossContact LX25 +15
    65
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Primacy HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 78 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online8463

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 77.8 (est.) + 40% × 83.5 = 80

    Primacy HP: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 63.3 = 65

    No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Primacy HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 53

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Primacy HP
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests40–
    Reviews found online72–

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 40.3 + 40% × 72.1 = 53

  4. 77

    Comfort

    CrossContact LX25 +15
    62
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Primacy HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online8059

    CrossContact LX25: 40% × 71.1 (est.) + 60% × 80.2 = 77

    Primacy HP: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 58.9 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX25 or Primacy HP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 71

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Primacy HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online78–

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 77.9 = 71

    No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    CrossContact LX25 +9
    63
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Primacy HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7561

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 72

    Primacy HP: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 61 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Primacy HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 79

    Handling (owners)

    CrossContact LX25 +19
    60
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Primacy HP
    Reviews found online7960
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental CrossContact LX25Michelin Primacy HP
Relative Score 77 64
Dry 76 65
Wet 80 65
Snow 53 –
Comfort 77 62
Noise 71 –
Treadwear 72 63
Handling (owners) 79 60

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

CrossContact LX25

± 8

Primacy HP

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryCrossContact LX25Primacy HPΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #2/3 Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady #5/6 2010 Autocar Tyre Test - FWD – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossContact LX25

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
  • Significantly improved wet and snow traction
  • Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness

Cons

  • Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
  • Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
  • Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
All owner themes in the CrossContact LX25 review

Tire B Primacy HP

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and longevity
  • Strong dry-road grip and handling
  • High fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance

Cons

  • Noticeable decline in wet-weather grip as tread depth decreases
  • High retail price compared to competitors
  • Increased road noise as the tire ages
All owner themes in the Primacy HP review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental CrossContact LX25

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin Primacy HP

Mixed

Community opinion on the Michelin Primacy HP is divided depending on use case: enthusiasts frequently criticize them for lacking grip compared to dedicated Pilot Sport performance tires, though many appreciate their playful, low-traction slide characteristics on cars like the GR86/BRZ. Owners also note their low rolling resistance and suitability for mild climates, but raise occasional discussions around shoulder cracking with age and their limitation as summer-only rubber.

gr86.org ·2024-11-11

“So long as you’ve got some tread, the stock Primacy HP tires are plenty safe for Bay Area weather all year ‘round. Just don’t drive anywhere that gets real winter weather or freezing temps. I’d avoid trips up to Tahoe in January. And don’t climb Mt. Diablo or Mt. Hamilton when they get their occasional dusting of snow. (I live in upstate NY now, so I’m familiar with tires & winter conditions …but I’m also a Bay Area native.)”
g42.bimmerpost.com

“BIMMERPOST / Classifieds Asking Price: USD 30.00 Location: ✓ Local Pickup Only Item Interest These tires were removed from my F10 535i M Sport with 15k miles on them. They have 3/32nd (30%) of tread depth remaining. They are great for those of you looking to do some burnouts or donuts. Both tires have not been patched. I am asking $30 local pick up only in SoCal 91765.”
mbworld.org

“I have these tires on my 2013 GL550 and they handle really well here in Chicago. They are a little loud for me, but do great in the snow and rain.”
Top themes
#grip vs playfulness#comparison to pilot sport#summer tire limitations#tread cracking concerns#low rolling resistance#oem fitment discussion

Based on 36 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact LX25 B · Michelin Primacy HP
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available401
Rim diameters16″ – 22″17″
Tread depth10 - 12/32″—
UTQG740 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental CrossContact LX25

Michelin Primacy HP

Winner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 79 vs 60 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 80 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 77 vs 62 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 76 vs 65 on dry.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX25
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Michelin Primacy HP
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CrossContact LX25 or Primacy HP?

Which is better in the wet, CrossContact LX25 or Primacy HP?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 80 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact LX25 or Primacy HP?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 76 vs 65 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, CrossContact LX25 or Primacy HP?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 77 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, CrossContact LX25 or Primacy HP?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 72 vs 63 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology