Tests 59 · 1 test Owners 79 · 26 reviews
Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Nexen N'Fera RU5 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 26 + 16 owner reviews. How we score
CrossContact LX25 leads, 73–71 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 16 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
CrossContact LX25 +372Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 N'Fera RU5 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 70 ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 83 75 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 82.8 = 75
N'Fera RU5: 60% × 70.8 (est.) + 40% × 74.8 = 72
No road tests of dry for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
80
Wet
CrossContact LX25 +674Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 N'Fera RU5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 78 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 83 76 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 77.5 (est.) + 40% × 83.1 = 80
N'Fera RU5: 60% × 73.4 (est.) + 40% × 75.6 = 74
No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
53
Snow
N'Fera RU5 +760Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 N'Fera RU5 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 40 ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 72 52 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 40.2 + 40% × 71.7 = 53
N'Fera RU5: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 52.2 = 60
No road tests of snow for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
76
Comfort
CrossContact LX25 +373Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 N'Fera RU5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 79 76 CrossContact LX25: 40% × 70.8 (est.) + 60% × 79.3 = 76
N'Fera RU5: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.7 = 73
No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
71
Noise
CrossContact LX25 +269Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 N'Fera RU5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 77 73 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 77.3 = 71
N'Fera RU5: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.3 = 69
No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX25 or N'Fera RU5. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
72
Treadwear
Level72Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 N'Fera RU5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 76 75 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 72
N'Fera RU5: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 72
No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
79
Handling (owners)
CrossContact LX25 +673Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 N'Fera RU5 Reviews found online 79 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental CrossContact LX25 | Nexen N'Fera RU5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 71 |
| Dry | 75 | 72 |
| Wet | 80 | 74 |
| Snow | 53 | 60 |
| Comfort | 76 | 73 |
| Noise | 71 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | 79 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
CrossContact LX25
N'Fera RU5
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A CrossContact LX25
Pros
- Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
- Significantly improved wet and snow traction
- Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness
Cons
- Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
- Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
- Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
Tire B N'Fera RU5
Pros
- Exceptional value and significantly lower price point compared to major competitor brands
- Impressive tread life and durability, with some users reporting high mileage and slow wear rates
- Strong grip and confident handling on both dry and wet roads
Cons
- Subpar traction and performance in snow and winter conditions, with specific complaints regarding ice and snow handling
- Noise levels are average, with some users noting they are not exceptionally quiet
- Mixed reviews on specialized winter-weather safety outside of mild rainy climates
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental CrossContact LX25 | B · Nexen N'Fera RU5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All-Season Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 40 | 4 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 16″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 740 A A - B | 500 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 65,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 2 | 2 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental CrossContact LX25
Nexen N'Fera RU5
Narrow edge: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Nexen N'Fera RU5 if snow matters most to you. Nexen N'Fera RU5 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 60 vs 53 on snow.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 80 vs 74 on wet.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 79 vs 73 on handling.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 75 vs 72 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
CrossContact LX25 or N'Fera RU5?
Which is better in the wet, CrossContact LX25 or N'Fera RU5?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 80 vs 74 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact LX25 or N'Fera RU5?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 75 vs 72 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, CrossContact LX25 or N'Fera RU5?
Nexen N'Fera RU5, 60 vs 53 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, CrossContact LX25 or N'Fera RU5?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, CrossContact LX25 or N'Fera RU5?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 76 vs 73 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, CrossContact LX25 or N'Fera RU5?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 72 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology