tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental CrossContact UHP vs Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 43 + 24 owner reviews. How we score

Road Venture APT KL51 is ahead, 69–64

Check price on Amazon · Road Venture APT KL51 or CrossContact UHP on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    Road Venture APT KL51 +1
    69
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact UHPRoad Venture APT KL51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6969

    CrossContact UHP: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 68

    Road Venture APT KL51: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 69

    No road tests of dry for CrossContact UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Road Venture APT KL51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 70

    Wet

    Level
    70
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact UHPRoad Venture APT KL51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6970

    CrossContact UHP: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 70

    Road Venture APT KL51: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 70

    No road tests of wet for CrossContact UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Road Venture APT KL51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 56

    Snow

    Road Venture APT KL51 +9
    65
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact UHPRoad Venture APT KL51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online4761

    CrossContact UHP: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 46.7 = 56

    Road Venture APT KL51: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 61.4 = 65

    No road tests of snow for CrossContact UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Road Venture APT KL51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 64

    Comfort

    Road Venture APT KL51 +6
    70
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact UHPRoad Venture APT KL51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6370

    CrossContact UHP: 40% × 67.4 (est.) + 60% × 62.5 = 64

    Road Venture APT KL51: 40% × 69 (est.) + 60% × 70.4 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for CrossContact UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Road Venture APT KL51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 68

    Noise

    CrossContact UHP +1
    67
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact UHPRoad Venture APT KL51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6969

    CrossContact UHP: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 68

    Road Venture APT KL51: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.6 = 67

    No road tests of noise for CrossContact UHP or Road Venture APT KL51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 53

    Treadwear

    Road Venture APT KL51 +17
    70
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact UHPRoad Venture APT KL51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online4572

    CrossContact UHP: 60% × 58.7 (est.) + 40% × 45 = 53

    Road Venture APT KL51: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 72 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Road Venture APT KL51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 64

    Handling (owners)

    Road Venture APT KL51 +5
    69
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact UHPRoad Venture APT KL51
    Reviews found online6469
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental CrossContact UHPKumho Road Venture APT KL51
Relative Score 64 69
Dry 68 69
Wet 70 70
Snow 56 65
Comfort 64 70
Noise 68 67
Treadwear 53 70
Handling (owners) 64 69

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

CrossContact UHP

± 7

Road Venture APT KL51

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossContact UHP

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet grip
  • Smooth and comfortable ride on compatible vehicles
  • Inspires confidence in handling and cornering

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear, especially on front axles
  • High road noise
  • Firm or hard ride over bumps
All owner themes in the CrossContact UHP review

Tire B Road Venture APT KL51

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability, with many users reporting tens of thousands of miles
  • High-value pricing offering significant savings compared to premium competitors
  • Strong wet and dry traction with dependable on-road handling and braking

Cons

  • Mediocre performance in deep snow or severe winter conditions
  • Slightly increased rolling resistance leading to a minor reduction in fuel economy for some drivers
  • Occasional complaints regarding sidewall aesthetics or soft feel in high summer temperatures
All owner themes in the Road Venture APT KL51 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact UHP B · Kumho Road Venture APT KL51
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available276
Rim diameters16″ – 23″15″ – 18″
Tread depth9 - 10/32″12/32″
UTQG280 - 420 A - AA A600 A A
Treadwear warranty—60,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure50 - 51 psi51 psi
Sizes in common22

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental CrossContact UHP

Kumho Road Venture APT KL51

Winner: Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 — better treadwear, snow and comfort. Where the Continental CrossContact UHP is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 scores 70 vs 53 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 scores 65 vs 56 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 scores 70 vs 64 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact UHP
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Kumho Road Venture APT KL51
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CrossContact UHP or Road Venture APT KL51?

Which is better in the wet, CrossContact UHP or Road Venture APT KL51?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 70 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact UHP or Road Venture APT KL51?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 69 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, CrossContact UHP or Road Venture APT KL51?

Kumho Road Venture APT KL51, 65 vs 56 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, CrossContact UHP or Road Venture APT KL51?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 67 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, CrossContact UHP or Road Venture APT KL51?

Kumho Road Venture APT KL51, 70 vs 64 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, CrossContact UHP or Road Venture APT KL51?

Kumho Road Venture APT KL51, 70 vs 53 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology