Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 44 reviews
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 vs Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 44 + 24 owner reviews. How we score
Road Venture APT KL51 leads, 69–66 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 24 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
Road Venture APT KL51 +369Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 Road Venture APT KL51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 66 69 Mud-Terrain T/A KM2: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 66
Road Venture APT KL51: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 69
No road tests of dry for Mud-Terrain T/A KM2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Road Venture APT KL51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
67
Wet
Road Venture APT KL51 +370Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 Road Venture APT KL51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 66 70 Mud-Terrain T/A KM2: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 65.8 = 67
Road Venture APT KL51: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 70
No road tests of wet for Mud-Terrain T/A KM2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Road Venture APT KL51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
67
Snow
Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 +265Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 Road Venture APT KL51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 65 61 Mud-Terrain T/A KM2: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.3 = 67
Road Venture APT KL51: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 61.4 = 65
No road tests of snow for Mud-Terrain T/A KM2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Road Venture APT KL51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
66
Comfort
Road Venture APT KL51 +470Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 Road Venture APT KL51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 65 70 Mud-Terrain T/A KM2: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 65.1 = 66
Road Venture APT KL51: 40% × 69 (est.) + 60% × 70.4 = 70
No road tests of comfort for Mud-Terrain T/A KM2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Road Venture APT KL51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
59
Noise
Road Venture APT KL51 +867Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 Road Venture APT KL51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 49 69 Mud-Terrain T/A KM2: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 48.7 = 59
Road Venture APT KL51: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.6 = 67
No road tests of noise for Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 or Road Venture APT KL51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Treadwear
Road Venture APT KL51 +370Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 Road Venture APT KL51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 67 72 Mud-Terrain T/A KM2: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.2 = 67
Road Venture APT KL51: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 72 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for Mud-Terrain T/A KM2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Road Venture APT KL51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
68
Handling (owners)
Road Venture APT KL51 +169Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 Road Venture APT KL51 Reviews found online 68 69
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 | Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 69 |
| Dry | 66 | 69 |
| Wet | 67 | 70 |
| Snow | 67 | 65 |
| Comfort | 66 | 70 |
| Noise | 59 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 68 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Mud-Terrain T/A KM2
Road Venture APT KL51
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Mud-Terrain T/A KM2
Pros
- Aggressive and appealing visual aesthetic with iconic sidewall design
- Exceptional off-road traction in mud, gravel, sand, and snow
- Surprisingly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire, especially when new
Cons
- Develops a louder highway hum or 'whine' as mileage increases
- Can experience reduced traction or oversteer on wet pavement for some drivers
- Occasional tendency to spin on loose dry rock rather than bite
Tire B Road Venture APT KL51
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability, with many users reporting tens of thousands of miles
- High-value pricing offering significant savings compared to premium competitors
- Strong wet and dry traction with dependable on-road handling and braking
Cons
- Mediocre performance in deep snow or severe winter conditions
- Slightly increased rolling resistance leading to a minor reduction in fuel economy for some drivers
- Occasional complaints regarding sidewall aesthetics or soft feel in high summer temperatures
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 | B · Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mud-Terrain tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 1 | 6 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 17 - 20/32″ | 12/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 600 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 65 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51
Narrow edge: Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 — better noise, comfort and dry. Where the BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 scores 67 vs 59 on noise.
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 scores 70 vs 66 on comfort.
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 scores 69 vs 66 on dry.
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 scores 70 vs 67 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 or Road Venture APT KL51?
Which is better in the wet, Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 or Road Venture APT KL51?
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51, 70 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 or Road Venture APT KL51?
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51, 69 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 or Road Venture APT KL51?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 65 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 or Road Venture APT KL51?
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51, 67 vs 59 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 or Road Venture APT KL51?
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51, 70 vs 66 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 or Road Venture APT KL51?
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51, 70 vs 67 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology