Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 44 reviews
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 vs Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Road Venture APT KL51 leads, 69–68 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 24 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Road Venture APT KL51 +169Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 Road Venture APT KL51 Reviews found online 68 70 -
68
Wet
Road Venture APT KL51 +270Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 Road Venture APT KL51 Reviews found online 68 70 -
68
Snow
Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 +464Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 Road Venture APT KL51 Reviews found online 67 61 -
68
Comfort
Road Venture APT KL51 +270Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 Road Venture APT KL51 Reviews found online 67 72 -
61
Noise
Road Venture APT KL51 +768Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 Road Venture APT KL51 Reviews found online 53 70 -
67
Treadwear
Road Venture APT KL51 +168Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 Road Venture APT KL51 Reviews found online 67 70 -
70
Handling
Level70Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 Road Venture APT KL51 Reviews found online 70 70
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 | Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 69 |
| Dry | 68 | 69 |
| Wet | 68 | 70 |
| Snow | 68 | 64 |
| Comfort | 68 | 70 |
| Noise | 61 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 68 |
| Handling | 70 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Mud-Terrain T/A KM2
Road Venture APT KL51
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Mud-Terrain T/A KM2
Pros
- Aggressive and appealing visual aesthetic with iconic sidewall design
- Exceptional off-road traction in mud, gravel, sand, and snow
- Surprisingly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire, especially when new
Cons
- Develops a louder highway hum or 'whine' as mileage increases
- Can experience reduced traction or oversteer on wet pavement for some drivers
- Occasional tendency to spin on loose dry rock rather than bite
Tire B Road Venture APT KL51
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability, with many users reporting tens of thousands of miles
- High-value pricing offering significant savings compared to premium competitors
- Strong wet and dry traction with dependable on-road handling and braking
Cons
- Mediocre performance in deep snow or severe winter conditions
- Slightly increased rolling resistance leading to a minor reduction in fuel economy for some drivers
- Occasional complaints regarding sidewall aesthetics or soft feel in high summer temperatures
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 | B · Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 1 | 6 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 17 - 20/32″ | 12/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 600 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 65 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51
Too close to call: BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 and Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 is stronger on snow. Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 is stronger on noise.
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 scores 68 vs 61 on noise.
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 scores 68 vs 64 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.