Head-to-head Updated

Continental CrossContact UHP vs Toyo Proxes ST — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 43 + 14 owner reviews. How we score

Proxes ST is ahead, 71–65

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Toyo Proxes ST
Tire BToyo

Proxes ST

All Season

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 14 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Proxes ST +3
    72
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact UHPProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7075

    CrossContact UHP: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 69

    Proxes ST: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72

    No road tests of dry for CrossContact UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 69

    Wet

    Proxes ST +6
    75
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact UHPProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online6977

    CrossContact UHP: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 69

    Proxes ST: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 75

    No road tests of wet for CrossContact UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 56

    Snow

    Proxes ST +10
    66
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact UHPProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online4664

    CrossContact UHP: 60% × 62.1 (est.) + 40% × 46.2 = 56

    Proxes ST: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 66

    No road tests of snow for CrossContact UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    Proxes ST +5
    72
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact UHPProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6474

    CrossContact UHP: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 67

    Proxes ST: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for CrossContact UHP or Proxes ST. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 69

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact UHPProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online71–

    CrossContact UHP: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.5 = 69

    No road tests of noise for CrossContact UHP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 56

    Treadwear

    Proxes ST +13
    69
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact UHPProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5072

    CrossContact UHP: 60% × 60.7 (est.) + 40% × 49.6 = 56

    Proxes ST: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 65

    Handling (owners)

    Proxes ST +6
    71
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact UHPProxes ST
    Reviews found online6571
Scores at a glance
Continental CrossContact UHP vs Toyo Proxes ST: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental CrossContact UHPToyo Proxes ST
Relative Score 65 71
Dry 69 72
Wet 69 75
Snow 56 66
Comfort 67 72
Noise 69 –
Treadwear 56 69
Handling (owners) 65 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

CrossContact UHP

Proxes ST

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossContact UHP

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet grip
  • Smooth and comfortable ride on compatible vehicles
  • Inspires confidence in handling and cornering

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear, especially on front axles
  • High road noise
  • Firm or hard ride over bumps
All owner themes in the CrossContact UHP review

Tire B Proxes ST

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality compared to other brands and run-flats
  • Strong dry and wet grip with good resistance to aquaplaning

Cons

  • Poor performance and limited traction in snow and ice
  • A small number of users experienced disappointing treadwear and longevity
  • Conflicting feedback regarding wet grip, with isolated reports of poor performance
All owner themes in the Proxes ST review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact UHP B · Toyo Proxes ST
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available271
Rim diameters16″ – 23″19″
Tread depth9 - 10/32″—
UTQG280 - 420 A - AA A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental CrossContact UHP

Toyo Proxes ST

Winner: Toyo Proxes ST — better treadwear, snow and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Toyo Proxes ST rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Toyo Proxes ST scores 69 vs 56 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Toyo Proxes ST scores 66 vs 56 on snow.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Toyo Proxes ST scores 75 vs 69 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Toyo Proxes ST scores 71 vs 65 on handling.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact UHP
Tire B · Toyo Proxes ST

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CrossContact UHP or Proxes ST?

Which is better in the wet, CrossContact UHP or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 75 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact UHP or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 72 vs 69 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, CrossContact UHP or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 66 vs 56 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, CrossContact UHP or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 72 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, CrossContact UHP or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 69 vs 56 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology