Tests 68 · 1 test Owners 61 · 1,649 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 12 in 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“I had continental contact 5 on my juke had to replace fronts at 8000 mile mostly town driving and they were a bit noisy”
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental Eco Contact 5 vs Continental PremiumContact 6 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 42 road tests and 1,649 + 2,364 owner reviews. How we score
PremiumContact 6 is ahead, 82–64
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 84 · 42 tests Owners 75 · 2,364 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 50 in 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“My continental premium contact 6’s getting to end or ? I am using these for the last 3 years and drove 46K km on them. Treadwear indicator for 3mm is getting very close. Should I rush or let them run for maybe another 5-10K ? Read more”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
PremiumContact 6 +1984Why this score
Source Eco Contact 5 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 39 tests 68 88 Reviews found online 60 78 Eco Contact 5: 60% × 67.8 + 40% × 60.2 = 65
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 87.7 + 40% × 78 = 84
-
66
Wet
PremiumContact 6 +1985Why this score
Source Eco Contact 5 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 40 tests 68 88 Reviews found online 62 81 Eco Contact 5: 60% × 68.3 + 40% × 62.3 = 66
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 88.4 + 40% × 80.5 = 85
-
–
Snow
No comparison74Why this score
Source Eco Contact 5 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online – 77 PremiumContact 6: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 76.7 = 74
No road tests of snow for PremiumContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
60
Comfort
PremiumContact 6 +1575Why this score
Source Eco Contact 5 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 80 Reviews found online 56 71 Eco Contact 5: 40% × 66.2 (est.) + 60% × 56.4 = 60
PremiumContact 6: 40% × 80.4 + 60% × 70.8 = 75
No road tests of comfort for Eco Contact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison55Why this score
Source Eco Contact 5 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 22 tests – 43 Reviews found online – 72 PremiumContact 6: 60% × 43.1 + 40% × 72.2 = 55
-
63
Treadwear
PremiumContact 6 +1679Why this score
Source Eco Contact 5 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 88 Reviews found online 61 65 Eco Contact 5: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 63
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 88.1 + 40% × 65.1 = 79
No road tests of treadwear for Eco Contact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
60
Handling (owners)
PremiumContact 6 +1777Why this score
Source Eco Contact 5 PremiumContact 6 Reviews found online 60 77 -
77
Efficiency
Eco Contact 5 +374Why this score
Source Eco Contact 5 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 25 tests 77 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental Eco Contact 5 | Continental PremiumContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 82 |
| Dry | 65 | 84 |
| Wet | 66 | 85 |
| Snow | – | 74 |
| Comfort | 60 | 75 |
| Noise | – | 55 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 79 |
| Handling (owners) | 60 | 77 |
| Efficiency | 77 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
64
/ 100
Eco Contact 5
82
/ 100
PremiumContact 6
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Eco Contact 5 | PremiumContact 6 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 94% #8/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 90% #11/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | 93% #29/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 97% #3/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 100% #1/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | 77% #5/10 · 2023 The Best Electric Vehicle Tyres VS UHP Tyres | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/12 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | #2/50 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Eco Contact 5
Pros
- Exceptional fuel economy and low rolling resistance
- Strong dry pavement grip and handling stability
- Impressive longevity and tread wear mileage for many drivers
Cons
- Subpar wet weather grip and frequent wheel-spin in the rain
- Thin, delicate sidewalls susceptible to bulging and pothole damage
- Loud, intrusive road noise on coarse or rough asphalt
Tire B PremiumContact 6
Pros
- Exceptional grip and short braking distances on both dry and wet road surfaces
- Precise steering response and predictable handling near the limit
- High level of high-speed stability and driver confidence
Cons
- Faster tread wear and shorter lifespan reported by spirited drivers
- Increased road noise and harshness on coarse or rough asphalt
- Softer sidewalls can result in less immediate turn-in sharpness compared to dedicated ultra-high-performance tires
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Mixed
Continental Eco Contact 5
Community feedback on the Continental Eco Contact 5 is mixed, with drivers noting satisfactory performance for standard road driving but expressing concerns over rapid treadwear and road noise. Several users question their traction on slippery surfaces and compare them against alternative budget and premium options.
Top themes
#treadwear and longevity#road noise levels#traction on slippery surfaces#pricing versus competitors#factory tire replacement
Based on 6 community posts
Tire B
Positive
Continental PremiumContact 6
The community generally views the Continental PremiumContact 6 favorably, praising its wet grip, braking confidence, and overall capability across a range of cars including EVs and hot hatches. Criticisms are limited to a soft or soggy sidewall feel, high replacement cost on some OE fitments, and moderate longevity (e.g. ~22k km front on a Polestar 2, ~46k km elsewhere). Noise is considered acceptable, and several users prefer it to Michelin alternatives or the newer PC7 predecessor comparisons.
r/TyreReviews
·6 upvotes ·2026-09-01
“Pirelli PZero PZ5 too stiff for my like, Continental PremiumContact 6 too soft... I had some cheap 225/45/18 tyres for my older 3.0L RWD car with a quite stiff sport suspension. Replaced them with 225/40/18 Pirelli PZero PZ5. I realized these had a 5 % smaller sidewall, but 225/40 is the basic size. These were way too stiff for me! Roads here have plenty of imperfections and the bumps were giving me a headache. I managed to sell the old PZ5 for a good price and replaced them with Continental PremiumContact 6s, now with larger sidewall 225/45/18. It's alright, but there's definitely less road feedback than PZ5s. So I'm not really that happy with either. What would have been the best compromise between PZ5 and PC6? Goodyear Assymetric 6? Or maybe my fault was going for 40 % sidewall, PZ5 with 45 may had been suitable? It's just that the 45s cost way much more as a more rare size. Read more”
z4-forum.com
·2022-09-26
“In the case of summer tyres nope at the part of the market things haven't changed THAT MUCH... But there are now better tyres, smoother, quieter better handling..the Conti Premium Contact 6 on my cars was a noticeable improvement.. Price can be a major variable..not sure how they price out.. Assy 6 and PS5s are both in the same space as the Conti Premium 6.. Again had Assy 5 and it was a very good tyre..the Assy 6 is even better.. Each turn of the design just keeps getting better..the R+Ts are just old designs..things have moved on..BUT NOT THAT MUCH!”
r/croautomobili
·2 upvotes ·2026-10-31
“Zimska, WinterContact 870. Ljetna, Premium Contact 6. Mislim, i dalje (namjerno) furam 15 cola pa neću uzimat šrot za 50 eur kad Continental košta 80 eur.”
Top themes
#Excellent wet grip#Braking confidence#Soft sidewall comfort#High price#Tread wear longevity#Noise levels#EV fitment experiences#Comparison with Michelin/Pirelli
Based on 17 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental Eco Contact 5 | B · Continental PremiumContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 38 | 113 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 20″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 8 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 280 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 21 | 21 |
Which one should you actually buy?
64
/ 100
Continental Eco Contact 5
82
/ 100
Continental PremiumContact 6
Winner: Continental PremiumContact 6 — better dry, wet and handling. Pick the Continental Eco Contact 5 if efficiency matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 84 vs 65 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 85 vs 66 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 77 vs 60 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 79 vs 63 on treadwear.
Tire A · Continental Eco Contact 5
Tire B · Continental PremiumContact 6
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Eco Contact 5 or PremiumContact 6?
Which is better in the wet, Eco Contact 5 or PremiumContact 6?
Continental PremiumContact 6, 85 vs 66 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Eco Contact 5 or PremiumContact 6?
Continental PremiumContact 6, 84 vs 65 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Eco Contact 5 or PremiumContact 6?
Continental PremiumContact 6, 75 vs 60 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Eco Contact 5 or PremiumContact 6?
Continental PremiumContact 6, 79 vs 63 on our treadwear score.
Which rolls more easily, Eco Contact 5 or PremiumContact 6?
Continental Eco Contact 5, 77 vs 74 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology