Tests 68 · 1 test Owners 61 · 1,649 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 12 in 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“I had continental contact 5 on my juke had to replace fronts at 8000 mile mostly town driving and they were a bit noisy”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 10 road tests and 1,649 + 40 owner reviews. How we score
Primacy 4+ is ahead, 78–64
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 68 · 1 test Owners 61 · 1,649 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 12 in 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“I had continental contact 5 on my juke had to replace fronts at 8000 mile mostly town driving and they were a bit noisy”
Tests 85 · 10 tests Owners 71 · 40 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (abrasion)
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Eco Contact 5 | Primacy 4+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 9 tests | 68 | 82 |
| Reviews found online | 60 | 71 |
Eco Contact 5: 60% × 67.8 + 40% × 60.2 = 65
Primacy 4+: 60% × 82.4 + 40% × 71 = 78
| Source | Eco Contact 5 | Primacy 4+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 9 tests | 68 | 82 |
| Reviews found online | 62 | 75 |
Eco Contact 5: 60% × 68.3 + 40% × 62.3 = 66
Primacy 4+: 60% × 82.1 + 40% × 74.6 = 79
| Source | Eco Contact 5 | Primacy 4+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | ≈ 66 (est.) | 73 |
| Reviews found online | 56 | 69 |
Eco Contact 5: 40% × 66.2 (est.) + 60% × 56.4 = 60
Primacy 4+: 40% × 72.9 + 60% × 69.3 = 71
No road tests of comfort for Eco Contact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | Eco Contact 5 | Primacy 4+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests | – | 76 |
| Reviews found online | – | ≈ 66 (est.) |
Primacy 4+: 60% × 76.2 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 72
No owner ratings of noise for Primacy 4+. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Eco Contact 5 | Primacy 4+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests | ≈ 65 (est.) | 95 |
| Reviews found online | 61 | 70 |
Eco Contact 5: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 63
Primacy 4+: 60% × 94.9 + 40% × 69.6 = 85
No road tests of treadwear for Eco Contact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Eco Contact 5 | Primacy 4+ |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 60 | 66 |
| Source | Eco Contact 5 | Primacy 4+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 8 tests | 77 | 78 |
| Category | Continental Eco Contact 5 | Michelin Primacy 4+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 78 |
| Dry | 65 | 78 |
| Wet | 66 | 79 |
| Comfort | 60 | 71 |
| Noise | – | 72 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 85 |
| Handling (owners) | 60 | 66 |
| Efficiency | 77 | 78 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Eco Contact 5
Primacy 4+
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Eco Contact 5 | Primacy 4+ | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 94% #8/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | 96% #3/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 90% #11/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | 82% #7/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 97% #3/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | 91% #5/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 100% #1/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | 90% #2/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/12 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | #4/8 2025 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community feedback on the Continental Eco Contact 5 is mixed, with drivers noting satisfactory performance for standard road driving but expressing concerns over rapid treadwear and road noise. Several users question their traction on slippery surfaces and compare them against alternative budget and premium options.
Based on 6 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Continental Eco Contact 5 | B · Michelin Primacy 4+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 38 | 66 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 20″ | 16″ – 21″ |
| Sizes in common | 23 | 23 |
Continental Eco Contact 5
Michelin Primacy 4+
Winner: Michelin Primacy 4+ — better treadwear, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 85 vs 63 on treadwear.
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 78 vs 65 on dry.
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 79 vs 66 on wet.
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 71 vs 60 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Michelin Primacy 4+, 79 vs 66 on our wet score.
Michelin Primacy 4+, 78 vs 65 on our dry score.
Michelin Primacy 4+, 71 vs 60 on our comfort score.
Michelin Primacy 4+, 85 vs 63 on our treadwear score.
Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 78 on the efficiency score, within 3 points.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology