Head-to-head Updated

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 6 + 25 road tests and 3,266 + 5,956 owner reviews. How we score

EfficientGrip Performance 2 is ahead, 84–59

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental EcoContact 6

EcoContact 6

Summer

± 5

Tests 71 · 6 tests Owners 43 · 3,266 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (noise)

“For efficiency I would recommend continental ecocontact 6/7. I get around 11kw/100km in the city and 14-15kw/100km on the highway. Would recommend. RWD 19 inch wheels Not very good on a rainy road tho”

Tests 87 · 25 tests Owners 83 · 5,956 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wear)

“Hankook ventus prime 4 VS Goodyear efficientgrip performance 2 I cannot decide between these two tires for ages now. Customer reviews seem all over the place. I drive a tuned volkswagen polo mk6 2020. I need something that inspires confidence for spirited driving in corners with good stability, mainly dry handling and braking but also relatively comfortable. So far I've learned that the goodyear is more comfortable, better in the wet, better at braking but extremely lousy in handling because of the soft sidewalls. Can someone that has used the EGP2 confirm those claims or are they exaggerating. Base spec polos are known for a harsh ride and I live in the balkans. The roads are full of potholes and sometimes you can't even drive around them. specs: 195/55R16 87V”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 4 tests that measured wet braking for both, EcoContact 6 won 0 and EfficientGrip Performance 2 won 4 (average 87% vs 93% of the best).
  • In 3 tests that measured dry braking for both, EcoContact 6 won 2 and EfficientGrip Performance 2 won 0 (average 97% vs 96% of the best).
  • In 3 tests that measured dry handling for both, EcoContact 6 won 0 and EfficientGrip Performance 2 won 2 (average 99% vs 99% of the best).
  • In 3 tests that measured straight aquaplaning for both, EcoContact 6 won 0 and EfficientGrip Performance 2 won 3 (average 91% vs 94% of the best).
  • In 3 tests that measured wet handling for both, EcoContact 6 won 0 and EfficientGrip Performance 2 won 3 (average 93% vs 98% of the best).
  1. 64

    Dry

    EfficientGrip Performance 2 +17
    81
    Why this score
    SourceEcoContact 6EfficientGrip Performance 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 22 tests7781
    Reviews found online4582
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 2–097%96%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–299%99%

    EcoContact 6: 60% × 76.9 + 40% × 45.3 = 64

    EfficientGrip Performance 2: 60% × 81 + 40% × 82 = 81

  2. 51

    Wet

    EfficientGrip Performance 2 +31
    82
    Why this score
    SourceEcoContact 6EfficientGrip Performance 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 22 tests5382
    Reviews found online4783
    Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–286%95%
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–391%94%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 0–487%93%
    Wet Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–184%99%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–393%98%

    EcoContact 6: 60% × 53.4 + 40% × 47.4 = 51

    EfficientGrip Performance 2: 60% × 82.1 + 40% × 82.9 = 82

  3. 56

    Comfort

    EfficientGrip Performance 2 +24
    80
    Why this score
    SourceEcoContact 6EfficientGrip Performance 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 65 (est.)83
    Reviews found online4978

    EcoContact 6: 40% × 64.8 (est.) + 60% × 49.4 = 56

    EfficientGrip Performance 2: 40% × 82.6 + 60% × 77.5 = 80

    No road tests of comfort for EcoContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 78

    Noise

    EcoContact 6 +3
    75
    Why this score
    SourceEcoContact 6EfficientGrip Performance 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 13 tests8580
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–0100%99%

    EcoContact 6: 60% × 85.3 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 78

    EfficientGrip Performance 2: 60% × 80.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 75

    No owner ratings of noise for EcoContact 6 or EfficientGrip Performance 2. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 60

    Treadwear

    EfficientGrip Performance 2 +34
    94
    Why this score
    SourceEcoContact 6EfficientGrip Performance 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 9 tests79100
    Reviews found online3285
    Wear (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–181%100%

    EcoContact 6: 60% × 79.2 + 40% × 32 = 60

    EfficientGrip Performance 2: 60% × 100 + 40% × 84.6 = 94

  6. 45

    Handling (owners)

    EfficientGrip Performance 2 +36
    81
    Why this score
    SourceEcoContact 6EfficientGrip Performance 2
    Reviews found online4581
  7. 100

    Efficiency

    EcoContact 6 +10
    90
    Why this score
    SourceEcoContact 6EfficientGrip Performance 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 18 tests10090
    Fuel Consumption (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%99%
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 3–096%81%
Scores at a glance
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental EcoContact 6Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
Relative Score 59 84
Dry 64 81
Wet 51 82
Comfort 56 80
Noise 78 75
Treadwear 60 94
Handling (owners) 45 81
Efficiency 100 90

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

EcoContact 6

± 4

EfficientGrip Performance 2

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 5 tests that ran both, Continental EcoContact 6 finished ahead 0 times and Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 5 times.

DisciplineCategoryEcoContact 6EfficientGrip Performance 2ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 97% 96% +0.7 2–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2022 Summer Tyre Market Overview · 215/55 R17
Dry Handling Dry 99% 99% −0.6 0–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 86% 95% −9.9 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 91% 94% −3.0 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Wet Braking Wet 87% 93% −5.4 0–4 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2022 Summer Tyre Market Overview · 215/55 R17
Wet Circle Wet 84% 99% −14.2 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Wet Handling Wet 93% 98% −5.6 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Noise Noise 100% 99% +1.2 1–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Wear Treadwear 81% 100% −19.2 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Fuel Consumption Efficiency 100% 99% +1.4 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 ViBilagare Eco vs Normal Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 96% 81% +14.7 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 64% 69% −5.0 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2022 ViBilagare Eco vs Normal Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #1/21 #2/21 – 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Value Cost 75% 100% −25.5 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Overall Ranking Overall #21/44 #16/44 – 0–5 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2022 Summer Tyre Market Overview · 215/55 R17

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A EcoContact 6

Pros

  • Excellent fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
  • Low road noise and high cabin comfort
  • Good dry grip and stable handling under normal driving conditions

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear, especially on drive wheels
  • Subpar wet-weather grip and high susceptibility to aquaplaning
  • Shallow initial tread depth out of the box (approx. 6.0-6.5mm)
All owner themes in the EcoContact 6 review

Tire B EfficientGrip Performance 2

Pros

  • Exceptional tread longevity and mileage capability
  • Quiet operation and high cabin comfort
  • Strong grip and predictable handling in both wet and dry conditions

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can cause steering vagueness or body roll during aggressive cornering
  • Some users report increased tire noise or resonance as the tread wears down
  • Occasional complaints regarding weaker wet braking or traction compared to dedicated sports tires
All owner themes in the EfficientGrip Performance 2 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental EcoContact 6

Negative

Community sentiment regarding the Continental Eco Contact 6 is overwhelmingly negative, with users frequently criticizing its poor wet weather grip, braking performance, and handling. While praised occasionally for low rolling resistance and energy efficiency, owners repeatedly report premature tread wear, cracking, and chunking or delamination under normal driving conditions.

r/AutoTuga ·3 upvotes ·2026-08-20

“Desgaste anormal Continental EcoContact 6 Q — BMW X3 BMW X3 (~72.000 km, cerca de 1 ano e pouco). Já trocou os 4 pneus uma vez e vai agora para o segundo jogo. O primeiro conjunto começou a escamar / sair aos bocados (principalmente à frente). A marca assumiu e colocou pneus iguais (Continental EcoContact 6 Q). Agora, ao fim de cerca de 20.000 km, está a acontecer exatamente o mesmo à frente. Para piorar, após notar perda de pressão lenta atrás, fomos verificar e os dois pneus traseiros estão completamente comidos por dentro. Mais alguém com problemas crónicos de desgaste prematuro com este modelo de pneu ou comportamento semelhante no X3? Read more”

r/TyreReviews ·6 upvotes ·2026-03-20

“use up factory tires or replace them? asking for come clarity of mind. my (electric) car's factory tires are "not great", just ecocontact 6's that put efficiency over everything else basically, they are not directional and will probably last a long while because they are so hard. this winter i bought a set of pirelli winter 3's for my trip to norway but also for winter in general. those tires preform better on litteral ice than the ecocontact's do in the rain. its a striking difference. the pirellis handled a 13% incline of ice brilliantly and even actual blizzard conditions. (both i got on video as people didnt believe me) i am genuinely amazed what modern winter tires can do. but i am a bit torn on the choice between getting rid of basically brand new tires (they only did about 5k) and replacing them with something decent for the summer and having tires that actually work when its wet or stop when i need them to or keep driving them until the ones i got are worn out. to be clear, i dont give a crap about the effiicency or really the lifespan of tires. braking and wet performance is vastly more important to me than saving a Watt. saving energy nor lifespan isnt a great comfort when i'm sliding into another car or tree. would getting something decent make such a big difference to warrant the cost and waste or am i better off to just run these down first? edit: sidenote, the car in question is a Renault 5. its got a pretty weird tire size (195/55R18) that limits options a bit”

r/BMW ·2 upvotes ·2025-05-18

“Used Continental EcoContact 6 I have recently bought a G31 from 2022 which came with winter tires. Therefor I have bought summer tires which are used and were advertised as 5,5mm profile depth on each tire. I have measured each tire and am wondering which tire should be installed on which side and if front or rear would be better. Unfortunately there is no mark to show on which position they were on the previous owners car. Starting from outside moving inside I have measured the following millimetres: Tire 1: 5.51, 5.69, 5.85, 5.36 Tire 2: 5.40, 5.58, 5.71, 5.33 Tire 3: 5.59, 5.69, 5.79, 5.39 Tire 4: 5.38, 5.55, 5.73, 5.34 Seeing the numbers I would go with tire 2 and 4 on one axis und 1 and 3 on the other. Would that be a good idea and where should each pair go, front or rear? Is this even important at this low difference? I am happy for any advise. Thanks. Read more”

Top themes
#poor wet grip#energy efficiency#premature wear#tread chunking#factory OE fitment#replacement alternatives

Based on 29 community posts

Tire B

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

Positive

Community opinion on the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 is largely positive, with users frequently praising its exceptional wet performance, high durability, and overall comfort. Some users note that its soft sidewalls can make it feel less sharp during spirited cornering, but it remains a top choice for efficiency, braking, and longevity.

r/tires ·1 upvote ·2024-11-10

“17" Goodyear efficient grip performance 2 small leak identified Hi, On my VW Touran 2019, 1.5 TSI, 17" alu oem wheels I have set Goodyear efficient grip performance 2 . There is a small leak lets say the pressure goes fro m 2.5psi to 2 psi in approx 7-10 days. The VW tpms warns me usually every 2-3 weeks. Im posting a new topic as I cant seem to upload pictures on the other one... Thanks to some help here I found the leak. See the pictures. I have no idea what is that roundish shape it seems smooth/rubbery and the hole clearly come from inside it. What now? Slime bottle? Glue? Or this thing that goes inside like a tire repair kit with the kind of rope thingy? Thanks!”

r/TyreReviews ·5 upvotes ·2026-08-23

“Advice on new tyres So my car got stolen (RIP) and I bought a 16' MB c200d with rears 245/40r18 Its time to change them and I don't know what to do. A/S are not needed because snow is very rare in central Spain. Winter temperatures range between 0-10°C and summer range from 30 to 40. As I drive 25-30000 km per year I especially value wet performance and durability (Minimum 35-40000 km). The problem is, the tyres that would fit perfectlly to me are not available in this size (GY efficient grip performance 2 -best tyres i've ever had- and Michelin Primacy 5). What i've seen is Firestone (both roadhawk 2 and roadhawk sport), continental PC7, GY assy 6, Michelin PS5, bridgestone T6, Dunlop sport TG, kormoran/tigar/Taurus summer 2, nexen sport, hancook (Ventus evo 137 and Ventus prime 4) and kumho ps72. Even though It would be nice to save some money, i'm worried about losing rear grip when wet (its my first rwd) so its not important. What would you pick? Read more”

r/tires ·1 upvote ·2024-11-10

“17" Goodyear efficient grip performance 2 small leak Hi, On my VW Touran 2019, 1.5 TSI, 17" alu oem wheels I have set Goodyear efficient grip performance 2 . There is a small leak lets say the pressure goes fro m 2.5psi to 2 psi in approx 7-10 days. The VW tpms warns me usually every 2-3 weeks. Those are summer tires, I just removed them for swapping with winter ones and I haven't cleaned them yet. They are quite dirty at the moment. The leaking one, pictured, was in the front this year, I switch them front/back every year. In my opinion it can do one last year (next summer) in the back. How would you fix the leak? I read those slime sprays damages the tire internally over time, but them its really approaching end of life fast in my opinion... I did visual inspection, I really dont see anything except maybe 1or two very tiny mark that could have been a nail puncture or something but its nothing sure... Maybe soap+ water? Thanks for hints. Ps: I have the tool somewhere for the indicator measurement, I cant find it right now.”

Top themes
#Wet performance and braking#High durability and longevity#Soft sidewalls and cornering handling#Comfort and low rolling resistance#Comparison with Michelin Primacy

Based on 9 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental EcoContact 6 B · Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available10435
Rim diameters13″ – 22″15″ – 21″
Tread depth7/32″8/32″
UTQG320 A A300 A - AA A
SidewallBlackwallBlack Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering
Max pressure51 psi50 psi
Sizes in common2525

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental EcoContact 6

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

Winner: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 — better handling, treadwear and wet. Pick the Continental EcoContact 6 if efficiency and noise matter most to you.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 scores 81 vs 45 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 scores 94 vs 60 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 scores 82 vs 51 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 scores 80 vs 56 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is rolling resistance

Continental EcoContact 6 won 3 of 3 shared rolling resistance tests.

Tire A · Continental EcoContact 6
Tire B · Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

EcoContact 6 or EfficientGrip Performance 2?

Which is better in the wet, EcoContact 6 or EfficientGrip Performance 2?

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2, 82 vs 51 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, EcoContact 6 or EfficientGrip Performance 2?

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2, 81 vs 64 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, EcoContact 6 or EfficientGrip Performance 2?

Continental EcoContact 6, 78 vs 75 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, EcoContact 6 or EfficientGrip Performance 2?

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2, 80 vs 56 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, EcoContact 6 or EfficientGrip Performance 2?

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2, 94 vs 60 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, EcoContact 6 or EfficientGrip Performance 2?

Continental EcoContact 6, 100 vs 90 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology