Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 25 + 14 road tests and 5,970 + 2,532 owner reviews. How we score

EfficientGrip Performance 2 is ahead, 84–75

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tests 87 · 25 tests Owners 82 · 5,970 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wear)

“Advice on new tyres So my car got stolen (RIP) and I bought a 16' MB c200d with rears 245/40r18 Its time to change them and I don't know what to do. A/S are not needed because snow is very rare in central Spain. Winter temperatures range between 0-10°C and summer range from 30 to 40. As I drive 25-30000 km per year I especially value wet performance and durability (Minimum 35-40000 km). The problem is, the tyres that would fit perfectlly to me are not available in this size (GY efficient grip performance 2 -best tyres i've ever had- and Michelin Primacy 5). What i've seen is Firestone (both roadhawk 2 and roadhawk sport), continental PC7, GY assy 6, Michelin PS5, bridgestone T6, Dunlop sport TG, kormoran/tigar/Taurus summer 2, nexen sport, hancook (Ventus evo 137 and Ventus prime 4) and kumho ps72. Even though It would be nice to save some money, i'm worried about losing rear grip when wet (its my first rwd) so its not important. What would you pick? Read more”

Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Tire BHankook

Ventus Prime 4

Summer

± 4

Tests 77 · 14 tests Owners 71 · 2,532 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)

“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 10 tests that measured dry braking for both, EfficientGrip Performance 2 won 4 and Ventus Prime 4 won 6 (average 96% vs 97% of the best).
  • In 10 tests that measured wet braking for both, EfficientGrip Performance 2 won 2 and Ventus Prime 4 won 8 (average 91% vs 93% of the best).
  • In 7 tests that measured straight aquaplaning for both, EfficientGrip Performance 2 won 4 and Ventus Prime 4 won 3 (average 95% vs 94% of the best).
  • In 6 tests that measured wear for both, EfficientGrip Performance 2 won 6 and Ventus Prime 4 won 0 (average 97% vs 70% of the best).
  • In 5 tests that measured noise for both, EfficientGrip Performance 2 won 3 and Ventus Prime 4 won 2 (average 99% vs 99% of the best).
  1. 81

    Dry

    EfficientGrip Performance 2 +2
    79
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip Performance 2Ventus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 22 / 12 tests8183
    Reviews found online8273
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 10 shared tests · wins 4–696%97%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 2–299%99%

    EfficientGrip Performance 2: 60% × 81 + 40% × 82 = 81

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 82.7 + 40% × 73.1 = 79

  2. 82

    Wet

    EfficientGrip Performance 2 +5
    77
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip Performance 2Ventus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 22 / 13 tests8279
    Reviews found online8375
    Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 4–092%85%
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 7 shared tests · wins 4–395%94%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 10 shared tests · wins 2–891%93%
    Wet Braking (concrete) (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 2–189%86%
    Wet Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–099%98%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 1–398%98%

    EfficientGrip Performance 2: 60% × 82.2 + 40% × 82.9 = 82

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 74.5 = 77

  3. 79

    Comfort

    EfficientGrip Performance 2 +11
    68
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip Performance 2Ventus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 1 tests8370
    Reviews found online7767

    EfficientGrip Performance 2: 40% × 82.5 + 60% × 77.3 = 79

    Ventus Prime 4: 40% × 70.3 + 60% × 67.2 = 68

  4. 74

    Noise

    EfficientGrip Performance 2 +13
    61
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip Performance 2Ventus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / 8 tests8058
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 3–299%99%

    EfficientGrip Performance 2: 60% × 79.8 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 74

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 57.6 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 61

    No owner ratings of noise for EfficientGrip Performance 2 or Ventus Prime 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 94

    Treadwear

    EfficientGrip Performance 2 +20
    74
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip Performance 2Ventus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / 6 tests10079
    Reviews found online8567
    Abrasion (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 3–180%73%
    Wear (% of best) · 6 shared tests · wins 6–097%70%

    EfficientGrip Performance 2: 60% × 100 + 40% × 84.6 = 94

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.5 + 40% × 66.9 = 74

  6. 80

    Handling (owners)

    EfficientGrip Performance 2 +8
    72
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip Performance 2Ventus Prime 4
    Reviews found online8072
  7. 90

    Efficiency

    EfficientGrip Performance 2 +6
    84
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip Performance 2Ventus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 18 / 9 tests9084
    Fuel Consumption (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–298%98%
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 5–091%89%
Scores at a glance
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Relative Score 84 75
Dry 81 79
Wet 82 77
Comfort 79 68
Noise 74 61
Treadwear 94 74
Handling (owners) 80 72
Efficiency 90 84

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

EfficientGrip Performance 2

± 4

Ventus Prime 4

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 10 tests that ran both, Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 finished ahead 6 times and Hankook Ventus Prime 4 4 times.

DisciplineCategoryEfficientGrip Performance 2Ventus Prime 4ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 96% 97% −0.8 4–6 in 10 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 225/50R17
Dry Handling Dry 99% 99% 0.0 2–2 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 92% 85% +7.2 4–0 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 95% 94% +0.8 4–3 in 7 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 225/50R17
Wet Braking Wet 91% 93% −1.9 2–8 in 10 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 225/50R17
Wet Braking (concrete) Wet 89% 86% +2.8 2–1 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 225/50R17
Wet Circle Wet 99% 98% +0.7 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Wet Handling Wet 98% 98% +0.7 1–3 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Noise Noise 99% 99% +0.5 3–2 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Abrasion Treadwear 80% 73% +7.3 3–1 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 225/50R17
Wear Treadwear 97% 70% +26.7 6–0 in 6 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 225/50R17
Fuel Consumption Efficiency 98% 98% −0.7 1–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 225/50R17
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 91% 89% +2.0 5–0 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2024 TUV and DEKRA Test of Michelin Primacy 5 vs Rivals · 205/55 R16
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 73% 83% −9.4 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #1/20 #4/20 – 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Value Cost 81% 67% +14.3 4–0 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Overall Ranking Overall #3/16 #11/16 – 6–4 in 10 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 225/50R17

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A EfficientGrip Performance 2

Pros

  • Exceptional tread longevity and mileage capability
  • Quiet operation and high cabin comfort
  • Strong grip and predictable handling in both wet and dry conditions

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can cause steering vagueness or body roll during aggressive cornering
  • Some users report increased tire noise or resonance as the tread wears down
  • Occasional complaints regarding weaker wet braking or traction compared to dedicated sports tires
All owner themes in the EfficientGrip Performance 2 review

Tire B Ventus Prime 4

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry grip providing high confidence
  • Significantly reduced road noise and smooth, quiet ride quality
  • Competitively priced offering great value compared to top-tier premium brands

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, leading to shorter overall tire life
  • Noticeable decrease in wet traction and grip as the tread wears down past the halfway mark
  • Stiffer sidewalls can translate to a firmer ride or reduced comfort on rough surfaces
All owner themes in the Ventus Prime 4 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

Positive

Community opinion on the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 is largely positive, with users frequently praising its exceptional wet performance, high durability, and overall comfort. Some users note that its soft sidewalls can make it feel less sharp during spirited cornering, but it remains a top choice for efficiency, braking, and longevity.

r/tires ·1 upvote ·2024-11-10

“17" Goodyear efficient grip performance 2 small leak Hi, On my VW Touran 2019, 1.5 TSI, 17" alu oem wheels I have set Goodyear efficient grip performance 2 . There is a small leak lets say the pressure goes fro m 2.5psi to 2 psi in approx 7-10 days. The VW tpms warns me usually every 2-3 weeks. Those are summer tires, I just removed them for swapping with winter ones and I haven't cleaned them yet. They are quite dirty at the moment. The leaking one, pictured, was in the front this year, I switch them front/back every year. In my opinion it can do one last year (next summer) in the back. How would you fix the leak? I read those slime sprays damages the tire internally over time, but them its really approaching end of life fast in my opinion... I did visual inspection, I really dont see anything except maybe 1or two very tiny mark that could have been a nail puncture or something but its nothing sure... Maybe soap+ water? Thanks for hints. Ps: I have the tool somewhere for the indicator measurement, I cant find it right now.”

r/TyreReviews ·3 upvotes ·2026-06-16

“Hankook ventus prime 4 VS Goodyear efficientgrip performance 2 I cannot decide between these two tires for ages now. Customer reviews seem all over the place. I drive a tuned volkswagen polo mk6 2020. I need something that inspires confidence for spirited driving in corners with good stability, mainly dry handling and braking but also relatively comfortable. So far I've learned that the goodyear is more comfortable, better in the wet, better at braking but extremely lousy in handling because of the soft sidewalls. Can someone that has used the EGP2 confirm those claims or are they exaggerating. Base spec polos are known for a harsh ride and I live in the balkans. The roads are full of potholes and sometimes you can't even drive around them. specs: 195/55R16 87V”

r/tires ·1 upvote ·2024-11-10

“17" Goodyear efficient grip performance 2 small leak identified Hi, On my VW Touran 2019, 1.5 TSI, 17" alu oem wheels I have set Goodyear efficient grip performance 2 . There is a small leak lets say the pressure goes fro m 2.5psi to 2 psi in approx 7-10 days. The VW tpms warns me usually every 2-3 weeks. Im posting a new topic as I cant seem to upload pictures on the other one... Thanks to some help here I found the leak. See the pictures. I have no idea what is that roundish shape it seems smooth/rubbery and the hole clearly come from inside it. What now? Slime bottle? Glue? Or this thing that goes inside like a tire repair kit with the kind of rope thingy? Thanks!”

Top themes
#Wet performance and braking#High durability and longevity#Soft sidewalls and cornering handling#Comfort and low rolling resistance#Comparison with Michelin Primacy

Based on 9 community posts

Tire B

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Positive

Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with drivers viewing it as a comfortable, quiet, and capable touring tire. Users frequently praise its strong dry and wet performance alongside its compelling price-to-performance ratio compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Some uncertainties exist regarding long-term tread wear and slight fuel economy impacts, but owners generally report satisfactory everyday reliability.

r/TyreReviews ·4 upvotes ·2024-03-19

“Are there any Hankook Ventus Prime 4 longevity reviews (perhaps personal experience?) The only info I was able to find is Autobild 2022 and 2024, and ADAC 2024 reviews. In the first one they expect 39k km, in the second 26k and in ADAC - 50k. I'm not sure what to believe. I'm a fairly moderate user and will be replacing stock Primacy 3s which lasted around 45k km. I would like to have something that will last around 4-5 years, which at my current usage would be around 30-35k km. If they consistently fall short of it I would probably pay a premium for a more expensive brand, but reviews give very different figures. If ADAC figures is to be trusted I would surely get them, because I would probably replace the car before I have to put on new tires. But 26k km in the latest Autobild review falls short of my expectations a bit. Are those figures typically less than real life due to more extensive testing and usage? I'm driving a compact SUV with 50/50 city highway driving and no sporty aspirations, very default usage scenario. I could pay more and get goodyear efficientgrip performance 2, but at their longevity they will probably need to be replaced out of age before I wear them down realistically, so that's why I was initially settling in more midrange priced Hankook offering. Would love any help, and appreciate the help I received in my previous post! Read more”

r/kereta ·2 upvotes ·2026-09-24

“Aim for rainy condition. Best are 1.Bridgestone Turanza 005 2.Hankook ventus prime 4.”

r/TireQuestions ·1 upvote ·2026-10-09

“Found a cut on one of my tires, is it 100% cooked? Three month old Hankook Ventus Prime 4 and I found a cut/split. It’s holding air fine but it is cooked?”

Top themes
#value for money#comfort and low noise#wet and dry grip#comparison with premium brands#tread longevity questions#touring versus sports handling

Based on 41 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Sizes available3566
Rim diameters15″ – 21″15″ – 20″
Tread depth8/32″—
UTQG300 A - AA A200 - 420 A A
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering—
Max pressure50 psi—
Sizes in common2222

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Winner: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 — better treadwear, noise and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 scores 94 vs 74 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 scores 74 vs 61 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 scores 79 vs 68 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 scores 80 vs 72 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet braking

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 won 8 of 10 shared wet braking tests.

Tire A · Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
Tire B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

EfficientGrip Performance 2 or Ventus Prime 4?

Which is better in the wet, EfficientGrip Performance 2 or Ventus Prime 4?

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2, 82 vs 77 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, EfficientGrip Performance 2 or Ventus Prime 4?

Neither, by our numbers: 81 vs 79 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, EfficientGrip Performance 2 or Ventus Prime 4?

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2, 74 vs 61 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, EfficientGrip Performance 2 or Ventus Prime 4?

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2, 79 vs 68 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, EfficientGrip Performance 2 or Ventus Prime 4?

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2, 94 vs 74 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, EfficientGrip Performance 2 or Ventus Prime 4?

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2, 90 vs 84 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology