Head-to-head Updated

Continental SportContact 7 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 22 + 14 road tests and 1,640 + 2,532 owner reviews. How we score

SportContact 7 is ahead, 83–75

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental SportContact 7
± 5

Tests 84 · 22 tests Owners 81 · 1,640 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 18 in 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)

“On my 2nd set. Got decent mileage from them. 15k miles from the first set of rears and i've 11k on the 2nd set with 4.5mm still left on them.”

Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Tire BHankook

Ventus Prime 4

Summer

± 4

Tests 77 · 14 tests Owners 71 · 2,532 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)

“Aim for rainy condition. Best are 1.Bridgestone Turanza 005 2.Hankook ventus prime 4.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 96

    Dry

    SportContact 7 +17
    79
    Why this score
    SourceSportContact 7Ventus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 21 / 12 tests10083
    Reviews found online9073

    SportContact 7: 60% × 99.9 + 40% × 90.4 = 96

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 82.7 + 40% × 73 = 79

  2. 93

    Wet

    SportContact 7 +16
    77
    Why this score
    SourceSportContact 7Ventus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 22 / 13 tests9679
    Reviews found online9075

    SportContact 7: 60% × 95.6 + 40% × 89.9 = 93

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 74.5 = 77

  3. 68

    Comfort

    Level
    68
    Why this score
    SourceSportContact 7Ventus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 1 tests5670
    Reviews found online7567

    SportContact 7: 40% × 55.7 + 60% × 75.4 = 68

    Ventus Prime 4: 40% × 70.3 + 60% × 67.3 = 68

  4. 62

    Noise

    SportContact 7 +1
    61
    Why this score
    SourceSportContact 7Ventus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 19 / 8 tests5958
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)

    SportContact 7: 60% × 59.2 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 62

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 57.6 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 61

    No owner ratings of noise for SportContact 7 or Ventus Prime 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 68

    Treadwear

    Ventus Prime 4 +6
    74
    Why this score
    SourceSportContact 7Ventus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 6 tests7279
    Reviews found online6367

    SportContact 7: 60% × 72 + 40% × 62.5 = 68

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.5 + 40% × 66.9 = 74

  6. 89

    Handling (owners)

    SportContact 7 +17
    72
    Why this score
    SourceSportContact 7Ventus Prime 4
    Reviews found online8972
  7. 72

    Efficiency

    Ventus Prime 4 +12
    84
    Why this score
    SourceSportContact 7Ventus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 21 / 9 tests7284
Scores at a glance
Continental SportContact 7 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental SportContact 7Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Relative Score 83 75
Dry 96 79
Wet 93 77
Comfort 68 68
Noise 62 61
Treadwear 68 74
Handling (owners) 89 72
Efficiency 72 84

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

SportContact 7

± 4

Ventus Prime 4

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategorySportContact 7Ventus Prime 4ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 100% #1/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test 92% #16/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 99% #2/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test 99% #6/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 100% #1/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test 90% #4/14 · 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test – Different tests
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 87% #3/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test 93% #6/7 · 2025 Al Volante Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 98% #3/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test 91% #16/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 100% #1/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test 87% #14/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking (concrete) Wet 100% #1/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 77% #15/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Circle Wet 100% #1/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test 98% #4/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 100% #1/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test 99% #2/8 · 2025 Moottori Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 100% #1/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test 90% #4/14 · 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test – Different tests
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 92% #2/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test 95% #4/7 · 2025 Die ReifenTester Summer Touring Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 100% #3/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test 99% #4/8 · 2025 Moottori Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise (tester's mark) Noise 87% #7/9 · 2025 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test 80% #11/14 · 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test – Different tests
Abrasion Treadwear 69% #4/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 72% #6/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wear Treadwear 58% #9/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 77% #6/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Fuel Consumption Efficiency 96% #6/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 100% #1/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 99% #2/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test 95% #10/14 · 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 62% #11/13 · 2023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tyre Test 69% #9/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Value Cost 33% #15/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 64% #5/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #2/10 2026 ACE Summer Tyre Test #11/16 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SportContact 7

Pros

  • Phenomenal wet and dry grip with high cornering limits
  • Precise steering response and excellent road feedback
  • Strong braking performance and high stability at speed

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear, especially with spirited driving or track use
  • Stiff sidewalls can contribute to a harsher, bumpier ride
  • Elevated road noise reported on certain road surfaces
All owner themes in the SportContact 7 review

Tire B Ventus Prime 4

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry grip providing high confidence
  • Significantly reduced road noise and smooth, quiet ride quality
  • Competitively priced offering great value compared to top-tier premium brands

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, leading to shorter overall tire life
  • Noticeable decrease in wet traction and grip as the tread wears down past the halfway mark
  • Stiffer sidewalls can translate to a firmer ride or reduced comfort on rough surfaces
All owner themes in the Ventus Prime 4 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental SportContact 7

Positive

The community generally regards the SportContact 7 as an excellent ultra-high-performance tire, praised for exceptional dry and wet grip, direct steering, quick warm-up, and good rim protection. Many rank it at or above the Michelin PS4S and ahead of the PS5 and Goodyear Asymmetric 6 for outright performance. The main criticisms are fast tread wear (often about 10–15k miles), low starting tread depth, softer sidewalls, some tramlining and noise, and poor durability on track.

Top themes
#Exceptional grip#Fast tread wear#Comparison with PS4S#Wet performance#Track durability#Comfort and noise#Rim protection#PremiumContact 7 alternative

Based on 115 community posts

Tire B

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Positive

Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with drivers viewing it as a comfortable, quiet, and capable touring tire. Users frequently praise its strong dry and wet performance alongside its compelling price-to-performance ratio compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Some uncertainties exist regarding long-term tread wear and slight fuel economy impacts, but owners generally report satisfactory everyday reliability.

r/TyreReviews ·4 upvotes ·2024-03-19

“Are there any Hankook Ventus Prime 4 longevity reviews (perhaps personal experience?) The only info I was able to find is Autobild 2022 and 2024, and ADAC 2024 reviews. In the first one they expect 39k km, in the second 26k and in ADAC - 50k. I'm not sure what to believe. I'm a fairly moderate user and will be replacing stock Primacy 3s which lasted around 45k km. I would like to have something that will last around 4-5 years, which at my current usage would be around 30-35k km. If they consistently fall short of it I would probably pay a premium for a more expensive brand, but reviews give very different figures. If ADAC figures is to be trusted I would surely get them, because I would probably replace the car before I have to put on new tires. But 26k km in the latest Autobild review falls short of my expectations a bit. Are those figures typically less than real life due to more extensive testing and usage? I'm driving a compact SUV with 50/50 city highway driving and no sporty aspirations, very default usage scenario. I could pay more and get goodyear efficientgrip performance 2, but at their longevity they will probably need to be replaced out of age before I wear them down realistically, so that's why I was initially settling in more midrange priced Hankook offering. Would love any help, and appreciate the help I received in my previous post! Read more”

r/kereta ·2 upvotes ·2026-09-24

“Aim for rainy condition. Best are 1.Bridgestone Turanza 005 2.Hankook ventus prime 4.”

r/CartalkHungary ·2 upvotes ·2024-09-20

“Becsapós ez, nagyon kevés csapadék volt a nyáron, és nagyon könnyű megszokni a száraz tapadást. Aztan meglepődik az ember az esőben. Nekem is volt ilyen gumi az autón, előtte meg az volt rajta amivel vettem (valami noname), hát a Hankook egy nagyságrenddel jobb volt annál. Most VP4 van rajta, es rendben van az is szerintem.”

Top themes
#value for money#comfort and low noise#wet and dry grip#comparison with premium brands#tread longevity questions#touring versus sports handling

Based on 41 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental SportContact 7 B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Sizes available12366
Rim diameters18″ – 24″15″ – 20″
Tread depth8 - 9/32″—
UTQG240 AA A200 - 420 A A
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—
Sizes in common1010

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental SportContact 7

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Winner: Continental SportContact 7 — better dry, handling and wet. Pick the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 if efficiency and treadwear matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental SportContact 7 scores 96 vs 79 on dry.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental SportContact 7 scores 89 vs 72 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental SportContact 7 scores 93 vs 77 on wet.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 84 vs 72 on efficiency.

Tire A · Continental SportContact 7
Tire B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SportContact 7 or Ventus Prime 4?

Which is better in the wet, SportContact 7 or Ventus Prime 4?

Continental SportContact 7, 93 vs 77 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, SportContact 7 or Ventus Prime 4?

Continental SportContact 7, 96 vs 79 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, SportContact 7 or Ventus Prime 4?

Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 61 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, SportContact 7 or Ventus Prime 4?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 68 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, SportContact 7 or Ventus Prime 4?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 74 vs 68 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, SportContact 7 or Ventus Prime 4?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 84 vs 72 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology