Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 6 + 0 road tests and 3,279 + 66 owner reviews. How we score
Energy Saver+ is ahead, 72–57
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 71 · 6 tests Owners 42 · 3,279 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (noise)
“For efficiency I would recommend continental ecocontact 6/7. I get around 11kw/100km in the city and 14-15kw/100km on the highway. Would recommend. RWD 19 inch wheels Not very good on a rainy road tho”
Tests – · none yet Owners 75 · 66 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | EcoContact 6 | Energy Saver+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests | 77 | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 45 | 73 |
EcoContact 6: 60% × 76.9 + 40% × 45.4 = 64
Energy Saver+: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 71
No road tests of dry for Energy Saver+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
| Source | EcoContact 6 | Energy Saver+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests | 53 | ≈ 71 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 47 | 71 |
EcoContact 6: 60% × 53.5 + 40% × 46.7 = 51
Energy Saver+: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 71 = 71
No road tests of wet for Energy Saver+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | EcoContact 6 | Energy Saver+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 65 (est.) | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 49 | 74 |
EcoContact 6: 40% × 64.8 (est.) + 60% × 49.4 = 56
Energy Saver+: 40% × 69.8 (est.) + 60% × 73.7 = 72
No road tests of comfort for EcoContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Energy Saver+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | EcoContact 6 | Energy Saver+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests | 85 | – |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 66 (est.) | – |
EcoContact 6: 60% × 84.8 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 77
No owner ratings of noise for EcoContact 6. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | EcoContact 6 | Energy Saver+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests | 79 | ≈ 73 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 32 | 84 |
EcoContact 6: 60% × 79.2 + 40% × 31.9 = 60
Energy Saver+: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 83.9 = 77
No road tests of treadwear for Energy Saver+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | EcoContact 6 | Energy Saver+ |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 45 | 72 |
| Source | EcoContact 6 | Energy Saver+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests | 100 | – |
| Category | Continental EcoContact 6 | Michelin Energy Saver+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 57 | 72 |
| Dry | 64 | 71 |
| Wet | 51 | 71 |
| Comfort | 56 | 72 |
| Noise | 77 | – |
| Treadwear | 60 | 77 |
| Handling (owners) | 45 | 72 |
| Efficiency | 100 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
EcoContact 6
Energy Saver+
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | EcoContact 6 | Energy Saver+ | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #6/8 2026 Auto Motor Und Sport Summer Tire Test R17 | #15/47 2018 AutoBild Summer Tyre Overview | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment regarding the Continental Eco Contact 6 is overwhelmingly negative, with users frequently criticizing its poor wet weather grip, braking performance, and handling. While praised occasionally for low rolling resistance and energy efficiency, owners repeatedly report premature tread wear, cracking, and chunking or delamination under normal driving conditions.
“What’s your opinion about eco tires like the continental eco contact 6, Michelin energy saver, etc. My car came with the continental eco contact 6 and i found them average on the dry. But, in the wet they felt bad, and in the rain especially around here in mountainous roads, they felt bad while turning and slowing down for a corner soon after i replaced them with the crossclimate 2 and still thinking about what I’m going to do with them if i put them on again on summer or sell them and keep the cross climate on. Read more”
“Experience with stock Continental EcoContact 6 tyres & moving to All-Seasons? Hey everyone, We recently had a puncture after clipping a rock on the exit of a car park, which has led me down a bit of a rabbit hole researching replacement options. It seems like the stock Continental EcoContact 6s get quite a lot of mixed-to-negative feedback online, particularly when it comes to wet weather performance and durability. I was curious what everyone's real-world experience has been with them so far? Are they really as mediocre in the wet as the reviews suggest, or do they hold up fine under normal driving? We've only had our buzz a week, so out experience is limited and only driven in dry conditions. Additionally, has anyone made the switch to dedicated all-season tyres on their Buzz, such as the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 or the Michelin CrossClimate 2? I'd love to know how they affect range, cabin noise, and overall grip, especially coming from the factory eco-tyres. We live in SW England where we get a lot of rain and occasional snow in the winter. Cheers!”
“For efficiency I would recommend continental ecocontact 6/7. I get around 11kw/100km in the city and 14-15kw/100km on the highway. Would recommend. RWD 19 inch wheels Not very good on a rainy road tho”
Based on 29 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Continental EcoContact 6 | B · Michelin Energy Saver+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 104 | 24 |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 22″ | 14″ – 16″ |
| Tread depth | 7/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 320 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 20 | 20 |
Continental EcoContact 6
Michelin Energy Saver+
Winner: Michelin Energy Saver+ — better handling, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Energy Saver+ scores 72 vs 45 on handling.
Michelin Energy Saver+ scores 71 vs 51 on wet.
Michelin Energy Saver+ scores 77 vs 60 on treadwear.
Michelin Energy Saver+ scores 72 vs 56 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Michelin Energy Saver+, 71 vs 51 on our wet score.
Michelin Energy Saver+, 71 vs 64 on our dry score.
Michelin Energy Saver+, 72 vs 56 on our comfort score.
Michelin Energy Saver+, 77 vs 60 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
