Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 65 reviews
Michelin Energy Saver+ vs Michelin CrossClimate — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 65 + 152 owner reviews. How we score
CrossClimate leads, 74–70 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 74 · 2 tests Owners 72 · 152 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 14 in 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test (noise)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
CrossClimate +676Why this score
Source Energy Saver+ CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 78 Reviews found online 71 73 Energy Saver+: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 70.9 = 70
CrossClimate: 60% × 77.5 + 40% × 72.6 = 76
No road tests of dry for Energy Saver+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
69
Wet
CrossClimate +675Why this score
Source Energy Saver+ CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 69 76 Energy Saver+: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.9 = 69
CrossClimate: 60% × 75.1 + 40% × 75.7 = 75
No road tests of wet for Energy Saver+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison68Why this score
Source Energy Saver+ CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 71 Reviews found online – 64 CrossClimate: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 64 = 68
-
71
Comfort
CrossClimate +172Why this score
Source Energy Saver+ CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 72 75 Energy Saver+: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 71
CrossClimate: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 74.9 = 72
No road tests of comfort for Energy Saver+ or CrossClimate. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison69Why this score
Source Energy Saver+ CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 71 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) CrossClimate: 60% × 70.7 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 69
No owner ratings of noise for CrossClimate. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
72
Treadwear
Level72Why this score
Source Energy Saver+ CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 76 71 Energy Saver+: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 76.1 = 72
CrossClimate: 60% × 73 + 40% × 70.9 = 72
No road tests of treadwear for Energy Saver+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
71
Handling (owners)
CrossClimate +172Why this score
Source Energy Saver+ CrossClimate Reviews found online 71 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy Saver+ | Michelin CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 74 |
| Dry | 70 | 76 |
| Wet | 69 | 75 |
| Snow | – | 68 |
| Comfort | 71 | 72 |
| Noise | – | 69 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Energy Saver+
CrossClimate
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Energy Saver+ | CrossClimate | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #15/47 2018 AutoBild Summer Tyre Overview | #9/9 2018 ADAC All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Energy Saver+
Pros
- Exceptional treadwear and longevity with many users reporting high mileage (30,000 to 60,000+ miles)
- Impressive fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
- High level of ride comfort and low road noise
Cons
- Subpar wet-weather traction and slippery behavior during cornering or braking in the rain
- Prone to aquaplaning at higher speeds on wet roads
- Tendency to develop sidewall cracking or dry rot as the tires age
Tire B CrossClimate
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Strong wet-weather grip and hydroplaning resistance
- Reliable traction in light snow and cold conditions
Cons
- Tendency to pick up and retain small stones in the tread pattern
- Noticeable drop in performance as tread depth decreases
- Potential for reduced fuel economy compared to dedicated summer tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy Saver+ | B · Michelin CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 24 | — |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 16″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Energy Saver+
Michelin CrossClimate
Narrow edge: Michelin CrossClimate — better dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin CrossClimate scores 76 vs 70 on dry.
Michelin CrossClimate scores 75 vs 69 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Energy Saver+ or CrossClimate?
Which is better in the wet, Energy Saver+ or CrossClimate?
Michelin CrossClimate, 75 vs 69 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Energy Saver+ or CrossClimate?
Michelin CrossClimate, 76 vs 70 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Energy Saver+ or CrossClimate?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 72 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Energy Saver+ or CrossClimate?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 72 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology