Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 10 reviews
Continental ExtremeContact DW vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 6 road tests and 10 + 16,807 owner reviews. How we score
EfficientGrip Performance is ahead, 74–66
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 6 tests Owners 72 · 16,807 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (wet braking)
“I've just had these fitted too and have to say they seem much quieter than my Kumhos and certainly dry grip is excellent ( though I don't tend to drift round corners, unless something has gone wrong!)”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
EfficientGrip Performance +878Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW EfficientGrip Performance Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 80 Reviews found online 71 74 ExtremeContact DW: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 70
EfficientGrip Performance: 60% × 80 + 40% × 74.2 = 78
No road tests of dry for ExtremeContact DW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
73
Wet
EfficientGrip Performance +679Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW EfficientGrip Performance Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 72 (est.) 79 Reviews found online 73 78 ExtremeContact DW: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 73.3 = 73
EfficientGrip Performance: 60% × 79.1 + 40% × 78.4 = 79
No road tests of wet for ExtremeContact DW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).
-
51
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW EfficientGrip Performance Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) – Reviews found online 38 – ExtremeContact DW: 60% × 60.1 (est.) + 40% × 38.4 = 51
No road tests of snow for ExtremeContact DW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
68
Comfort
EfficientGrip Performance +169Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW EfficientGrip Performance Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 61 Reviews found online 67 75 ExtremeContact DW: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 66.9 = 68
EfficientGrip Performance: 40% × 60.8 + 60% × 74.6 = 69
No road tests of comfort for ExtremeContact DW. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Noise
EfficientGrip Performance +169Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW EfficientGrip Performance Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 70 ≈ 67 (est.) ExtremeContact DW: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.7 = 68
EfficientGrip Performance: 60% × 71.2 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 69
No road tests of noise for ExtremeContact DW. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for EfficientGrip Performance. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
49
Treadwear
EfficientGrip Performance +1564Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW EfficientGrip Performance Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 57 (est.) 64 Reviews found online 39 64 ExtremeContact DW: 60% × 56.7 (est.) + 40% × 38.5 = 49
EfficientGrip Performance: 60% × 64.1 + 40% × 63.7 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for ExtremeContact DW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
58
Handling (owners)
EfficientGrip Performance +1472Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW EfficientGrip Performance Reviews found online 58 72 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison79Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW EfficientGrip Performance Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests – 79
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ExtremeContact DW | Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 74 |
| Dry | 70 | 78 |
| Wet | 73 | 79 |
| Snow | 51 | – |
| Comfort | 68 | 69 |
| Noise | 68 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 49 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 58 | 72 |
| Efficiency | – | 79 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ExtremeContact DW
EfficientGrip Performance
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | ExtremeContact DW | EfficientGrip Performance | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/4 2011 Tirerack Max Performance Summer Tyre Test | #8/8 2023 Autoklub ČR Premium Summer Tire Test R16 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ExtremeContact DW
Pros
- Outstanding wet and dry grip
- Quiet and comfortable highway cruising
- High traction for acceleration and handling stability
Cons
- Extremely soft sidewalls causing vague handling response
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Vulnerability to potholes, bubbles, and sidewall damage
Tire B EfficientGrip Performance
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and smooth driving dynamics
- Significantly reduced road noise compared to competitors
- Strong wet and dry weather traction with great aquaplaning resistance
Cons
- Soft sidewalls lead to noticeable body roll and a 'squishy' or vague steering feel during spirited cornering
- Faster-than-expected tread wear for some drivers
- Susceptibility to sidewall damage, bulging, or punctures from potholes
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental ExtremeContact DW
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
Community feedback on the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance is generally favorable, with drivers highlighting quiet road noise, good comfort, and solid wet and dry grip. Some users raise concerns regarding sidewall vulnerability and potential long-term cracking, while others inquire about variations in tread patterns.
“goodyear efficientgrip performance notches Hello! I bought a new goodyear efficientgrip performance 215/55/18 tires for my car. And it was surprise to see so many notches on the summer tire (1st & 2nd photo). Although the internet image doesn’t have any (3rd photo). What could it be and is it normal? Read more”
“FWIW the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 225/60 R16 102W XL tyres arrived and were installed today. The difference with previous tyres is like night and day. I have a 1200 km work trip later this week and I thought I'd take the Benz out. Interesting to see how they "break in" and how much if at all difference there is in mpg.”
“I've just had these fitted too and have to say they seem much quieter than my Kumhos and certainly dry grip is excellent ( though I don't tend to drift round corners, unless something has gone wrong!)”
Based on 22 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ExtremeContact DW | B · Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 1 | 52 |
| Rim diameters | 21″ | 14″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 340 A A | 340 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Raised Black Lettering - Serrated Black Lettering |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ExtremeContact DW
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
Winner: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance — better treadwear, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ExtremeContact DW rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance scores 64 vs 49 on treadwear.
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance scores 72 vs 58 on handling.
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance scores 78 vs 70 on dry.
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance scores 79 vs 73 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ExtremeContact DW or EfficientGrip Performance?
Which is better in the wet, ExtremeContact DW or EfficientGrip Performance?
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance, 79 vs 73 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ExtremeContact DW or EfficientGrip Performance?
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance, 78 vs 70 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, ExtremeContact DW or EfficientGrip Performance?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, ExtremeContact DW or EfficientGrip Performance?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 69 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, ExtremeContact DW or EfficientGrip Performance?
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance, 64 vs 49 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology