Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 10 reviews
Continental ExtremeContact DW vs Goodyear EfficientGrip — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 10 + 1,728 owner reviews. How we score
ExtremeContact DW leads, 64–60 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 1,728 reviews
“Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance SUV are summer tires, not all season tires, I believe.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
ExtremeContact DW +1258Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW EfficientGrip Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 72 53 ExtremeContact DW: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 70
EfficientGrip: 60% × 61.9 (est.) + 40% × 53.3 = 58
No road tests of dry for ExtremeContact DW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for EfficientGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
73
Wet
ExtremeContact DW +1063Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW EfficientGrip Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 74 60 ExtremeContact DW: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.5 = 73
EfficientGrip: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.9 = 63
No road tests of wet for ExtremeContact DW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for EfficientGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
51
Snow
EfficientGrip +1667Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW EfficientGrip Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 39 65 ExtremeContact DW: 60% × 58.9 (est.) + 40% × 39.1 = 51
EfficientGrip: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 67
No road tests of snow for ExtremeContact DW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for EfficientGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
68
Comfort
ExtremeContact DW +959Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW EfficientGrip Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 67 54 ExtremeContact DW: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 67.1 = 68
EfficientGrip: 40% × 66.4 (est.) + 60% × 54 = 59
No road tests of comfort for ExtremeContact DW or EfficientGrip. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Noise
ExtremeContact DW +1157Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW EfficientGrip Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 70 42 ExtremeContact DW: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 68
EfficientGrip: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 41.9 = 57
No road tests of noise for ExtremeContact DW or EfficientGrip. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
49
Treadwear
EfficientGrip +958Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW EfficientGrip Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 56 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 38 53 ExtremeContact DW: 60% × 56.3 (est.) + 40% × 38.1 = 49
EfficientGrip: 60% × 61.5 (est.) + 40% × 53 = 58
No road tests of treadwear for ExtremeContact DW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for EfficientGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
58
Handling (owners)
ExtremeContact DW +1147Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW EfficientGrip Reviews found online 58 47
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ExtremeContact DW | Goodyear EfficientGrip |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 60 |
| Dry | 70 | 58 |
| Wet | 73 | 63 |
| Snow | 51 | 67 |
| Comfort | 68 | 59 |
| Noise | 68 | 57 |
| Treadwear | 49 | 58 |
| Handling (owners) | 58 | 47 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ExtremeContact DW
EfficientGrip
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | ExtremeContact DW | EfficientGrip | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/4 2011 Tirerack Max Performance Summer Tyre Test | #7/14 2012 ACE Touring Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ExtremeContact DW
Pros
- Outstanding wet and dry grip
- Quiet and comfortable highway cruising
- High traction for acceleration and handling stability
Cons
- Extremely soft sidewalls causing vague handling response
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Vulnerability to potholes, bubbles, and sidewall damage
Tire B EfficientGrip
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and smooth ride quality
- Good fuel economy and rolling resistance
- Reliable wet and dry grip for everyday driving
Cons
- Soft sidewalls result in a mushy or 'jelly-like' steering feel during cornering
- Vulnerability to sidewall damage, bulges, and punctures from road hazards
- Faster-than-expected tread wear for some users
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental ExtremeContact DW
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Goodyear EfficientGrip
Community opinion on the Goodyear EfficientGrip family is mixed, with users frequently praising its high tread life, comfort, and solid wet braking compared to rivals. However, several drivers express concerns regarding soft sidewalls prone to pothole damage, vague handling dynamics during spirited driving, and disappointing cold or wet traction when used out of season. Many discussions also center on comparing it against alternative touring tires like Michelin Primacy and Continental PremiumContact.
“Nov KUMHO ecsta sport ps 72 ili minimalno korišćen GOODYEAR efficientgrip 2? Pozdrav, molim za savet ko je imao iskustva sa ovim modelima guma. Trebaju mi letnje gume za Mazda 3 2.0 benzin 150 KS (na sport oprugama) i imam dve ponude: Nove Kumho ecsta sport ps 72 ili (pouzdano znam) 2000km korišćene Goodyear Efficientgrip performance 2 sa DOT 0726. Cena je bukvalno ista, godišnje prelazim oko 6k, volim da vozim dinamično kada može. Za Kumho sam čitao da je skoro predstavljena i da je solidna dok sam za Goodyear čitao da je za udobnu vožnju bez dinamike. Da li suštinski ta "sport" razlika može da se oseti u povremenoj dinamičnoj vožnji toliko pa da ima smisla odustati od povoljne odlične premium gume? Read more”
“How bad is this? Should I replace these Goodyear efficient grips? Apparent tread chipping. DOT 2021, Made in 🇩🇪. Run 30k kilometres(18,000 miles). Mild off-roading on some back roads. Has seen 2 summers in Dubai. Chipping only in front 2 tyres. Diligently rotated tyres every 10k kms. Please advice …..”
“Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance SUV are summer tires, not all season tires, I believe.”
Based on 21 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ExtremeContact DW | B · Goodyear EfficientGrip |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 1 | 24 |
| Rim diameters | 21″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 340 A A | 340 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ExtremeContact DW
Goodyear EfficientGrip
Narrow edge: Continental ExtremeContact DW — better dry, noise and handling. Pick the Goodyear EfficientGrip if snow and treadwear matter most to you. Continental ExtremeContact DW rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Goodyear EfficientGrip scores 67 vs 51 on snow.
Continental ExtremeContact DW scores 70 vs 58 on dry.
Continental ExtremeContact DW scores 68 vs 57 on noise.
Continental ExtremeContact DW scores 58 vs 47 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ExtremeContact DW or EfficientGrip?
Which is better in the wet, ExtremeContact DW or EfficientGrip?
Continental ExtremeContact DW, 73 vs 63 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ExtremeContact DW or EfficientGrip?
Continental ExtremeContact DW, 70 vs 58 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ExtremeContact DW or EfficientGrip?
Goodyear EfficientGrip, 67 vs 51 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, ExtremeContact DW or EfficientGrip?
Continental ExtremeContact DW, 68 vs 57 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, ExtremeContact DW or EfficientGrip?
Continental ExtremeContact DW, 68 vs 59 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ExtremeContact DW or EfficientGrip?
Goodyear EfficientGrip, 58 vs 49 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology