Hankook Optimo H725 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS vs Hankook Optimo H725 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 3 + 0 road tests and 6,409 + 36 owner reviews. How we score

ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS is ahead, 76–55

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tests 75 · 3 tests Owners 79 · 6,409 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test (ice braking)

“I ran the dws on my 700whp corvette ZR1 for 5 years . Never a problem and wear really good . I’ve tracked them in the qtr mile and roll racing . They hooked pretty good ls at the track . Had a 1.60 sixty foot on them”

Hankook Optimo H725
Tire BHankook

Optimo H725

All-Season tire

Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 36 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 79

    Dry

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +26
    53
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUSOptimo H725
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests75≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online8545

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 75.3 + 40% × 84.5 = 79

    Optimo H725: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.5 = 53

    No road tests of dry for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 79

    Wet

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +22
    57
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUSOptimo H725
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests75≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online8752

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 74.5 + 40% × 86.6 = 79

    Optimo H725: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 57

    No road tests of wet for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 76

    Snow

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +21
    55
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUSOptimo H725
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests80≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online7146

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 79.9 + 40% × 70.9 = 76

    Optimo H725: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 55

    No road tests of snow for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 77

    Comfort

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +23
    54
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUSOptimo H725
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests75≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online8140

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 80.8 = 77

    Optimo H725: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 39.8 = 54

    No road tests of comfort for Optimo H725. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 74

    Noise

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +13
    61
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUSOptimo H725
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests71≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7852

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 71.3 + 40% × 77.8 = 74

    Optimo H725: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 61

    No road tests of noise for Optimo H725. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +11
    56
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUSOptimo H725
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6949

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 68.6 = 67

    Optimo H725: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 56

    No road tests of treadwear for ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 80

    Handling (owners)

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +34
    46
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUSOptimo H725
    Reviews found online8046
Scores at a glance
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS vs Hankook Optimo H725: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUSHankook Optimo H725
Relative Score 76 55
Dry 79 53
Wet 79 57
Snow 76 55
Comfort 77 54
Noise 74 61
Treadwear 67 56
Handling (owners) 80 46

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

Optimo H725

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

Pros

  • Exceptional wet traction and resistance to hydroplaning
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality that transforms vehicle dynamics
  • Strong dry grip and responsive, predictable cornering capabilities

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter-than-expected lifespan for some drivers
  • Increased road noise and drone developing as the tires wear down
  • Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a 'squishy' feel
All owner themes in the ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS review

Tire B Optimo H725

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

Positive

The community highly regards the Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS as an exceptional ultra-high performance all-season tire, frequently praising its superior wet and light snow traction, comfortable ride, and low road noise. While commonly preferred over competitors like Michelin for its value and everyday compliance, some users note trade-offs such as slightly softer sidewalls, minor steering feel loss, initial tread squirm, and occasional balancing or treadwear concerns. Overall, owners enthusiastically recommend it for daily driving, spirited commuting, and versatile year-round capability across a wide range of vehicles.

corvetteforum.com

“I just put them on my 17 Z06. $1190.00 for the set. Huge difference on cold days with regards to traction. I had these on my Chevy SS Sedan for years and loved them. Only complaint is that if the car sits for a couple of weeks you will notice a slight vibration due to low spot until they even out, at least that's what I encountered on the original DSW's. I also noticed since these are not run flats that the bumps are not as harsh, which hopefully will reduce potential rim cracks. That's the hope but with our MI roads it's a never ending battle! Good luck in your decision!”

mustang6g.com ·2 upvotes ·2024-12-10

“I needed a cold weather solution for my Mach 1 HP with CUP2s so I put Continental ExtremeContact DWS06 Plus tires on a set of the standard Mach 1 wheels and I have been pleasantly surprised by just how capable they are. I usually go Michelin, but decided to try these instead. Amusing amount of grip. Was able to comfortably pull over 1g in straight line braking and in the turns while staying predictable. Kept them on during the summer to see what I thought and although they can't compete with the CUP2s for outright performance, they trump the CUP2s in the rain, and in ride comfort, while providing a staggering amount of performance for an all season alternative. And although they are acceptable, with appropriate driving caution, when a little snow falls and/or when roads ice up a bit, they should not be considered a comprehensive winter tire solution. There are other much better solutions for that like the Bridgestone Blizzak tires.”

swedespeed.com ·2024-10-03

“Continental ExtremeContact DWS06 Plus are THE standard for a reason for high performance all-season tires. They have been the best for years and all other brands are only just now catching up to them. If you don't care as much about performance in dry then yeah the CC2 are a fine choice. Personally I deal with bad winters so I run DWS06 Plus as my summer set and then in the winter I switch to my Vredestein Wintrac Pro XL set on dedicated wheels. I run all-seasons in the summer in case we get some early ice/snow before I've swapped sets but nothing beats dedicated winter tires when you need them. Given, I live on a mountain with steep hills and a dirt road, I regularly deal with snow deep enough to high-center the car. If you don't deal with those conditions you can probably get away with all-seasons okay.”

Top themes
#Wet traction performance#Ride comfort improvement#Light snow capability#Michelin tire comparison#Soft sidewall feel#Road noise levels#Wheel balancing consistency

Based on 138 community posts

Tire B

Hankook Optimo H725

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS B · Hankook Optimo H725
CategoryAll SeasonAll-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available120—
Rim diameters16″ – 22″—
Tread depth10/32″9/32″
UTQG560 - 740 A - AA A700 A B
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure50 - 51 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

Hankook Optimo H725

Winner: Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS scores 80 vs 46 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS scores 79 vs 53 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS scores 77 vs 54 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS scores 79 vs 57 on wet.

Tire A · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
Tire B · Hankook Optimo H725

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS or Optimo H725?

Which is better in the wet, ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS or Optimo H725?

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS, 79 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS or Optimo H725?

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS, 79 vs 53 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS or Optimo H725?

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS, 76 vs 55 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS or Optimo H725?

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS, 74 vs 61 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS or Optimo H725?

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS, 77 vs 54 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS or Optimo H725?

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS, 67 vs 56 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology