Tests – · 1 test Owners 72 · 104 reviews
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 vs Michelin Defender T+H — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 104 + 1 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: ExtremeContact DWS 06 72, Defender T+H 71.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 69 · 1 review
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
76
Dry
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +670Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 80 71 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 72.9 (est.) + 40% × 79.5 = 76
Defender T+H: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 70
No road tests of dry for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
79
Wet
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +673Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 77 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 82 73 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 77.2 (est.) + 40% × 82.4 = 79
Defender T+H: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 73.3 = 73
No road tests of wet for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
68
Snow
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +365Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 66 62 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 68
Defender T+H: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.1 = 65
No road tests of snow for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
68
Comfort
Level68Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 67 67 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 67 = 68
Defender T+H: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 66.9 = 68
No road tests of comfort for ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Defender T+H. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
69
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 74 – ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 73.8 = 69
No road tests of noise for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
Defender T+H +873Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 70 76 Reviews found online 58 68 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 69.8 + 40% × 58.3 = 65
Defender T+H: 60% × 76.1 + 40% × 67.9 = 73
-
76
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Defender T+H Reviews found online 76 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 | Michelin Defender T+H |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 71 |
| Dry | 76 | 70 |
| Wet | 79 | 73 |
| Snow | 68 | 65 |
| Comfort | 68 | 68 |
| Noise | 69 | – |
| Treadwear | 65 | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | 76 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ExtremeContact DWS 06
Defender T+H
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | ExtremeContact DWS 06 | Defender T+H | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) | Treadwear | 67% #11/19 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires | 100% #1/8 · 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #6/19 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires | #1/8 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ExtremeContact DWS 06
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong performance in light snow and cold weather
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can reduce steering sharpness or cause rollover during heavy track/autocross use
- Tread wear can be faster than expected with aggressive driving or on lower-profile sizes
- Occasional reports of increased road noise or vibration as the tire ages
Tire B Defender T+H
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 | B · Michelin Defender T+H |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Premium Touring All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 560 A - AA A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
Michelin Defender T+H
Too close to call: Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 and Michelin Defender T+H are within 2 points overall. Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 is stronger on dry, wet and snow. Michelin Defender T+H is stronger on treadwear. Michelin Defender T+H rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Defender T+H scores 73 vs 65 on treadwear.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 76 vs 70 on dry.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 79 vs 73 on wet.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 68 vs 65 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Defender T+H?
Which is better in the wet, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Defender T+H?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 79 vs 73 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Defender T+H?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 76 vs 70 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Defender T+H?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 68 vs 65 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Defender T+H?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 68 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Defender T+H?
Michelin Defender T+H, 73 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology